disillusioned
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 10,376
- Reputation
- 30,741
All of these supposedly' pseudo-scientific' theories about how social relations are determined by evolution and natural selection rather than socioeconomic factors were right. Mainstream political opinions are bluepilled and normies are in denial.
How many Stacies or Chads do you see working at McDonald's? Or as janitors? You don't. Ever.
And it's not because they're pretty (well not only because of it).
Good genetics eventually start drifting upwards after a while because rich (aka smart) men marry attractive women at massively greater rates. Eventually this means there are no good genetics left at the bottom which is why 90% of poor people are ugly on top of being stupid.
It's so hilariously obvious yet normies just keep coping.
It's even reflected along geopolitical lines. The ugliest countries are also typically poor (aka India and other ethnic nations).
Everything is set in stone from the very beginning.
How many Stacies or Chads do you see working at McDonald's? Or as janitors? You don't. Ever.
And it's not because they're pretty (well not only because of it).
Good genetics eventually start drifting upwards after a while because rich (aka smart) men marry attractive women at massively greater rates. Eventually this means there are no good genetics left at the bottom which is why 90% of poor people are ugly on top of being stupid.
It's so hilariously obvious yet normies just keep coping.
It's even reflected along geopolitical lines. The ugliest countries are also typically poor (aka India and other ethnic nations).
Everything is set in stone from the very beginning.