Entschuldigung
Tudo nosso nada deles 🙏
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2020
- Posts
- 45,476
- Reputation
- 62,619
Da joooozzz da joooozthe degeneracy in white societies stems from jews who are parasitic so
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Da joooozzz da joooozthe degeneracy in white societies stems from jews who are parasitic so
>no argumentDa joooozzz da jooooz
SureBecause of another group of people, not because of europeans.
Your argument is just internet conspiracy theory lmao>no argument
yes i just did some light research its true niggers just have lukewarm iqafricans have a lot of livestock though i thought
cattle especially
but sheeps and goats were all there too
i dont think there was a lack of livestock but idrk ive never researched that
jews are a whole different topicYour argument is just internet conspiracy theory lmao
They are the original jews and thats what they all looked like 0 ADethopians are semitic lol i dont count them as nigs
WE WUZ ISRAELITES N SHIET.They are the original jews and thats what they all looked like 0 AD
this is also stupid, europeans commit degeneracy. Or they dont have self-accountabilty for their actions??Because of another group of people, not because of europeans.
Ghana and Mali empire is pretty neat, pales in comparison to European and Asian civilizations though.Ghana empire
View attachment 3373692View attachment 3373693
Swahili coast
View attachment 3373694
Sudan
View attachment 3373696
Lists goes on
Just like Israeldo it like everyone else? everyone has been troubled by external interference yet they still got through the rut and made a nation
Jews own whitesjews are a whole different topic
All the first christians (basically jews) were too look at the painting from then jesus was black and each century they made him lighterWE WUZ ISRAELITES N SHIET.
Never said they don’t, they also have had a barbaric and degenerate history themselves but we’re now in the 21st century and we have to compare ourselves to modern standards.this is also stupid, europeans commit degeneracy. Or they dont have self-accountabilty for their actions??
Exactly, white people start acting like blacks when they blame everything on the white men, now the whitoids blame everything on the Jewsthis is also stupid, europeans commit degeneracy. Or they dont have self-accountabilty for their actions??
Yes! Why don't the small, third-world countries with political, financial, and economic instabilities just start TAKING, EXTORTING, and ENSLAVING the imperialists' China and US! Who cares if they have more nukes than we have people, it's time to take what's ours! Them wybois will rule no longer!by taking from others as did everyone else
so why doesnt africa start taking from others too?
I thought you were white yourselfExactly, white people start acting like blacks when they blame everything on the white men, now the whitoids blame everything on the Jews
1. influenced by arabs (again)iGhana empire
View attachment 3373692View attachment 3373693
Swahili coast
View attachment 3373694
Sudan
View attachment 3373696
Lists goes on
The ghana empire was developed without any external influence from other countriesGhana and Mali empire is pretty neat, pales in comparison to European and Asian civilizations though.
you fell for the trad wife memethey also have had a barbaric and degenerate history themselves but
africans had the earliest start out of everybody so why didnt they just do it first? i dont understand. maybe they're just better and more moralistic than everybody else and have hearts of gold tbh.Yes! Why don't the small, third-world countries with political, financial, and economic instabilities just start TAKING, EXTORTING, and ENSLAVING the imperialists' China and US! Who cares if they have more nukes than we have people, it's time to take what's ours! Them wybois will rule no longer!
If you're homeless just buy a house type argument, W troll
It falls apart even further when you realise they literally had 30,000 years extra to create civilizations and that all of their advancement is due to what whites have been able to do in 300 years(some) africans do better in white societies because it's been procured and created by white people for people to thrive in. nonetheless, blacks lack the genetics to create their own societies to thrive in. that is why africa is a shithole yet there are some STEMcel africans who score higher on placement tests than some whites. they can do good when someone gives them training wheels and guides them along but when it comes to doing things themselves they fundamentally cannot. this is what i've gathered
Already 30 min and 2 pages JFL(some) africans do better in white societies because it's been procured and created by white people for people to thrive in. nonetheless, blacks lack the genetics to create their own societies to thrive in. that is why africa is a shithole yet there are some STEMcel africans who score higher on placement tests than some whites. they can do good when someone gives them training wheels and guides them along but when it comes to doing things themselves they fundamentally cannot. this is what i've gathered
Ok I agree. Then Portugal and Spain share haplogroups with sub-saharans.Yes, Ethiopians do share some haplogroups with Europeans, particularly in the northern regions of the country, due to historical gene flow from West Eurasia, indicating a noticeable Eurasian component in their genetic makeup, though their primary genetic ancestry remains African. (Copy and pasted the wrong thing)
Nothing special about itlike almost everybody has been a victim in human history africans aren't an exception so idk what makes their plight so special
It falls apart even further when you realise they literally had 30,000 years extra to create civilizations and that all of their advancement is due to what whites have been able to do in 300 years
legitafricans had the earliest start out of everybody so why didnt they just do it first? i dont understand. maybe they're just better and more moralistic than everybody else and have hearts of gold tbh.
The factors of the environment are always determinant for any type of intelligence, and it doesn't matter if you are African, South American, American, European, etc. If education is stratified in the society you live in, individuals in the same society will have different levels of intelligence and culture. There are always exceptional cases of gifted individuals who have a greater ability to learn than others, but if that individual comes from a family that does not have enough to meet the educational demands required of that child, despite his exceptional condition, he will not reach his potential in the expected time. In order to fulfill this potential, this child will live a life of effort, separation from his family, etc., because the environment is indeed important, he will be misunderstood and in order to live the life he wants to live, he will have to resort to abandoning his native cradle. And this is how many Africans, Indians, Chinese live, who end up leaving their homeland in order to fulfill their potential.(some) africans do better in white societies because it's been procured and created by white people for people to thrive in. nonetheless, blacks lack the genetics to create their own societies to thrive in. that is why africa is a shithole yet there are some STEMcel africans who score higher on placement tests than some whites. they can do good when someone gives them training wheels and guides them along but when it comes to doing things themselves they fundamentally cannot. this is what i've gathered
except for africansNothing special about it
I don't believe in "race" but every race has had their rule & fall
This was before they had contacted arabs1. influenced by arabs (again)
Fair enough but name a single European society that wasn’t influenced by semites?2. influenced by arabs (again)
They did, and they lost it, my opinion on why is intricate, but just know it mainly does with African Kangz and Qweens selling their rivals (and their own) for EuroProfitsafricans had the earliest start out of everybody so why didnt they just do it first? i dont understand. maybe they're just better and more moralistic than everybody else and have hearts of gold tbh.
Even there best area (south africa) was inhabited by Boers before native black africanslegit
Read a book and your ignorance will vanishexcept for africans
Mali Empireexcept for africans
this whole wall of text just completely ignored what i saidThe factors of the environment are always determinant for any type of intelligence, and it doesn't matter if you are African, South American, American, European, etc. If education is stratified in the society you live in, individuals in the same society will have different levels of intelligence and culture. There are always exceptional cases of gifted individuals who have a greater ability to learn than others, but if that individual comes from a family that does not have enough to meet the educational demands required of that child, despite his exceptional condition, he will not reach his potential in the expected time. In order to fulfill this potential, this child will live a life of effort, separation from his family, etc., because the environment is indeed important, he will be misunderstood and in order to live the life he wants to live, he will have to resort to abandoning his native cradle. And this is how many Africans, Indians, Chinese live, who end up leaving their homeland in order to fulfill their potential.
Again, it is not genetics that determines intelligence, but the environment and material conditions that make it possible or impossible for an individual to acquire knowledge of different qualities. In addition, you can acquire education, but that education is bad and you would end up educating yourself with insufficient education for high criteria, and that is not your responsibility, but that of the environment.
The perspective of race seems to me not enough to expose what you are trying to explain, I would rather talk about the western standard of knowledge that determines what is possible to be intelligent and what is not. And this is replicated in politics because many countries try to replicate the western model of society but it does not work because there is culture, there are rituals, there are different ways of understanding the institutions of a society and these things cannot be ignored and that is why western attempts to improve Africa fail. It is not that the genetics of Africans do not allow them to prosper, that idea seems to me very vague.
when have africans been on top? sub saharansRead a book and your ignorance will vanish
Eurocentric lie, south africa was inhabited by Khoisan people long before the boers.Even there best area (south africa) was inhabited by Boers before native black africans
Knows about haplogrups:Ok I agree. Then Portugal and Spain share haplogroups with sub-saharans.
Calling someone “mixed” because they share haplogroups is stupid btw
Read a book boyo instead of jerking off and you'll find outwhen have africans been on top? sub saharans
It’s nice you put so much effort but no one is reading thatThe factors of the environment are always determinant for any type of intelligence, and it doesn't matter if you are African, South American, American, European, etc. If education is stratified in the society you live in, individuals in the same society will have different levels of intelligence and culture. There are always exceptional cases of gifted individuals who have a greater ability to learn than others, but if that individual comes from a family that does not have enough to meet the educational demands required of that child, despite his exceptional condition, he will not reach his potential in the expected time. In order to fulfill this potential, this child will live a life of effort, separation from his family, etc., because the environment is indeed important, he will be misunderstood and in order to live the life he wants to live, he will have to resort to abandoning his native cradle. And this is how many Africans, Indians, Chinese live, who end up leaving their homeland in order to fulfill their potential.
Again, it is not genetics that determines intelligence, but the environment and material conditions that make it possible or impossible for an individual to acquire knowledge of different qualities. In addition, you can acquire education, but that education is bad and you would end up educating yourself with insufficient education for high criteria, and that is not your responsibility, but that of the environment.
The perspective of race seems to me not enough to expose what you are trying to explain, I would rather talk about the western standard of knowledge that determines what is possible to be intelligent and what is not. And this is replicated in politics because many countries try to replicate the western model of society but it does not work because there is culture, there are rituals, there are different ways of understanding the institutions of a society and these things cannot be ignored and that is why western attempts to improve Africa fail. It is not that the genetics of Africans do not allow them to prosper, that idea seems to me very vague.
Explain the idea of “genetics”, you say that an individual's ability to act is determined by genetics?this whole wall of text just completely ignored what i said
i agree that africans can thrive given they are in the right environment but they do not have the right genetics to create such an environment
like they can prosper and be smart but only under the guiding hand of others
1. ok its dogshit building anyway so idrcThis was before they had contacted arabs
Fair enough but name a single European society that wasn’t influenced by semites?
It doesn’t exist, you realize writing, farming, the wheel metal working etc were all introduced into Europe by semites right?
They share a very finite haplogroup with subsaharans, not enough to influence their race.Ok I agree. Then Portugal and Spain share haplogroups with sub-saharans.
Calling someone “mixed” because they share haplogroups is stupid btw
yes im a hereditarian but i do believe nurture plays an extremely important roleExplain the idea of “genetics”, you say that an individual's ability to act is determined by genetics?
this is not whites x africans btw. europe had very pillars from Arabs (mathematics and physiques) and East Asians (gun fire), just some examples.legit
It falls apart even further when you realise they literally had 30,000 years extra to create civilizations and that all of their advancement is due to what whites have been able to do in 300 years
Some people read it and others do not. I don't really care, I just like to debate lolIt’s nice you put so much effort but no one is reading that
God bless the jews, without them humanity would be in the stone age.this is not whites x africans btw. europe had very pillars from Arabs (mathematics and physiques) and East Asians (gun fire), just examples
And Im not going to count Jewish inventions, they are so many lmao (just look at Nobel prizes)
Africans had their specific ethnic group isolated from everybody, even from other Africans.
this my last answer on this topic, i dont want to debate about history again @Dominicoon
So if Europeans couldn’t develop civilization without Semitic influence what makes you think Africans would be different?this isnt a case for european superiority its a case for africans whole inferiority to the rest of the world, im not even trying to be discriminatory ive given up my SFcel ways
that's their fault thenAfricans had their specific ethnic group isolated from everybody, even from other Africans.