The TALL SKULL Cope Ends Now

[Deleted member 19101]

Rate mike mentzers skull.

He had a very robust but also handsome look

 

[MediterraneanApollo]

Rate mike mentzers skull.

He had a very robust but also handsome look

View attachment 2746051

literally cavill on roids

 

[Deleted member 19101]

literally cavill on roids

Mogs cavill

 

[Deleted member 57464]

just use AI images to make a point thery

 

[MediterraneanApollo]

also @thecel
you described my cranium 1:1
shorter brachy skull with very high forward growth
I will pm you if you want

 

[Deleted member 24770]

I see dwellers here throw around the phrase “tall skull” as if it’s a good thing. Cut the bullshit; I’m so sick of this cope.

View attachment 2738931

One major reason this guy’s skull looks good is that its neurocranium is low-set.

View attachment 2738939

Lowering the the top of the skull (especially the back of the top) is one of the most common things I do in side-profile morphs of forum members.

---

I’m orthocranic is that ideal?

 

[arab_chink]

i always see people who are taller with tall skulls, but with wide skulls they appear short in height, just a theory

 

[Latinolooksmaxxer]

 

[AscendingHero]

I see dwellers here throw around the phrase “tall skull” as if it’s a good thing. Cut the bullshit; I’m so sick of this cope.

View attachment 2738931

One major reason this guy’s skull looks good is that its neurocranium is low-set.

View attachment 2738939

Lowering the the top of the skull (especially the back of the top) is one of the most common things I do in side-profile morphs of forum members.

---

Isn't a high cranial top ideal?

Also a chamaecranic is characterised by the skull height reaching less than 70 percent of the skull length, right?

Define skull height?

 

[AscendingHero]

looks like this:

View attachment 2738950

• long depth (69.4 cephalic index)
• horizontally narrow (69.4 cephalic index)
• vertically low-set neurocranium (chamaecranic)

How are you measuring cephalic index from these front and side on photos? how are you doing it?

 

[AscendingHero]

Isn't a high cranial top ideal?

View attachment 2790165View attachment 2790166

Also a chamaecranic is characterised by the skull height reaching less than 70 percent of the skull length, right?

Define skull height?

@thecel

 

[Deleted member 46979]

Yet he fucks hard and is constantly ranked the best looking guy

muh hoLlyJew rAnKinGs!

 

[AscendingHero]

Chama looks mogger with a good front-to-back skull ratio:

View attachment 2745314

Jaw could be a bit more mogger but insane

I love your upper third morphs

What application did you use to morph btw?

 

[Deleted member 46979]

Tom of Finland. The art I am referring to:
View attachment 2738980

Tom of Finland stamps - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[AscendingHero]

This morph was made by that gay Finnish cartoonist.

no it wasn't , if not disprove me

 

[Deleted member 30380]

looks like this:

View attachment 2738950

• long depth (69.4 cephalic index)
• horizontally narrow (69.4 cephalic index)
• vertically low-set neurocranium (chamaecranic)

Looks like straight dogshit

 

[Deleted member 77954]

@HarrierDuBois jfl

 

[haymaker283]

One major reason this guy’s skull looks good is that its neurocranium is low-set.

Stopped reading here.
He looks like a retarded ogre.

 

[Deleted member 83485]

 

[Deleted member 81422]

Tom of Finland. The art I am referring to:
View attachment 2738980

Legit caging hard at this image

 

[Deleted member 81422]

A giant skull is absolutely essential if you want to be respected right off the bat

 

[mandiblade]

Isn't a high cranial top ideal?

This doesn't really have anything to do with that

His cranial top isn't low

Also a chamaecranic is characterised by the skull height reaching less than 70 percent of the skull length, right?

According to humanphenotypes.net, yes.

Define skull height?

According to this, it is the distance between the basion and the bregma
(I didn't read the study btw )
Use sci-hub if you want to read it for some reason

Error - Cookies Turned Off

doi.org

So basically this

 

[AscendingHero]

This doesn't really have anything to do with that

His cranial top isn't low

What asking him specific question, mutually exclusive to this thread

How high is his cranial top though? How do you know that's just not hair?

According to this, it is the distance between the basion and the bregma
(I didn't read the study btw )
Use sci-hub if you want to read it for some reason

Error - Cookies Turned Off

doi.org

So basically this

Helpful, appreciate mate, so if I wanted a superficial visual landmark to measure it, would/should I start at the tragus for example?

Unless you got Superman X-ray vision, can't really exactly tell where the basion is just looking at someone + what if they had longer hair for example

Study doesn't really post any example except that the author measured/took into consideration the basion to bregma height

 

[mandiblade]

What asking him specific question, mutually exclusive to this thread

? Couple of typos?

How high is his cranial top though? How do you know that's just not hair?

I'm guessing that it's his head shape because I didn't think humanphenotypes would deceptively change his hair shape.

Helpful, appreciate mate,

No problem

Helpful, appreciate mate, so if I wanted a superficial visual landmark to measure it, would/should I start at the tragus for example?

Unless you got Superman X-ray vision, can't really exactly tell where the basion is just looking at someone + what if they had longer hair for example

Study doesn't really post any example except that the author measured/took into consideration the basion to bregma height

The basion should be where you estimate the mastoid process is. This should be a bit above the end of the ear. The tragus is a bit too high.