The term “sub 5” makes zero sense

out what ratings are based on in practice
Nigga its all fucking science, you think a fag would choose a guy differently than a girl would? Only difference would be height

Stop being fucking retarded and kill yourself please.

You’re braindead, delete ur account
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Acquiescence
nigga i am future forum legend stfu nigger
Forum legend with barely positive post rep. Also youre bragging about being a “future legend” amongst chronically online losers. Brutally mogged by my old account

IMG 0492


Not that it even matters anyways but youre annoying as fuck
 
  • +1
Reactions: mangotimer
Nigga its all fucking science, you think a fag would choose a guy differently than a girl would? Only difference would be height

Stop being fucking retarded and kill yourself please.

You’re braindead, delete ur account
Fuck it let’s keep going if you want I’m genuinely curious now

When science says X or Y feature is attractive, how did they come to that determination?

Surely it’s based upon what people instinctually think of and respond to it right??? And how those features consequently correspond to certain outcomes like dating success or higher earnings in the workforce

What other basis of comparison is there?

And if 80% of women view men as below average, you cannot put 5 as the center of a data based rating scale

Please elab why this is wrong
 
Originally the SUB also meant Short Ugly and Bald. You combine that with sub-5/10 face and you have the next ER
 
  • Woah
Reactions: hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Similar threads

vexd
Replies
42
Views
112
vexd
vexd
Banned User
Replies
24
Views
189
yvngchris
yvngchris
emogymmaxx
Replies
1
Views
22
emogymmaxx
emogymmaxx
iblamejordan1
Replies
6
Views
70
iblamejordan1
iblamejordan1
B
Replies
3
Views
29
bornover
B

Users who are viewing this thread

  • NoAppeal333
Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →