The Texas school shooting makes no sense

Central Cee

Central Cee

Platinum
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Posts
1,018
Reputation
1,149
Why did an 18 year old go to an ELEMENTARY school and shoot it up???

Why didn’t he shoot up the high school he went to?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: N1c, Deleted member 7192 and Gonthar
it makes perfect sense, turns out giving tools of mass murder to unhinged people isn't a good idea
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, Deleted member 18849, Richard_Hungwell and 5 others
Just as always weak little faggots, why did the guy who shot up the supermarket not go to black neighborhoods and shoot them there? because he was a little bitch. Why didnt he shot up LGBT protests filled with feminists, cucks, faggots?
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Nautica, Hades, Deleted member 7192 and 14 others
it makes perfect sense, turns out giving tools of mass murder to unhinged people isn't a good idea
yes more laws will definitely stop the criminals who don't follow any laws :forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 11028, Hades, Deleted member 18849 and 1 other person
yes more laws will definitely stop the criminals who don't follow any laws :forcedsmile:
the criminal being autistic 18 y/o boy who is most likely too scared to talk to a girl (the standard school shooter type). jfl at thinking this guy would easily be able to access a gun if they were illegal.

why does this shit never happen in countries with gun regulation?


also this reasoning is extremely retarded. let's just not have any laws because criminals will break them anyway. cage at your non-existent critical thinking skills
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Gazzamogga, Nautica, Deleted member 11028 and 10 others
Why are these mass shooters always low inhib enough to buy guns and shoot up a school, but not low inhib enough to talk to a girl and get their dick wet?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Nautica, JL~, AscensionMan98 and 18 others
CIA plant by globohomo to take our guns and rights! :soy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
Why are these mass shooters always low inhib enough to buy guns and shoot up a school, but not low inhib enough to talk to a girl and get their dick wet?
because shooting people doesn't require socialising with them
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nautica and never_lucky
the criminal being autistic 18 y/o boy who is most likely too scared to talk to a girl (the standard school shooter type). jfl at thinking this guy would easily be able to access a gun if they were illegal.

why does this shit never happen in countries with gun regulation?


also this reasoning is extremely retarded. let's just not have any laws because criminals will break them anyway. cage at your non-existent critical thinking skills
yes lets just ban guns in a country that has the most guns per capita in the world by a huge margin :forcedsmile:

you're almost as retarded as the people who think it's realistic to ship all niggers back to africa.

clearly people aren't just going to turn underground and start bootlegging guns or making it themselves like during the prohibition era with alcohol 😷

what are you going to ban next? knives? fertilizer? propane tanks? cars? some arab killed 80 people in france with a truck. i guess trucks should be illegal too :feelsuhh:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell, Yliaster, Deleted member 15067 and 1 other person
yes lets just ban guns in a country that has the most guns per capita in the world by a huge margin :forcedsmile:

you're almost as retarded as the people who think it's realistic to ship all niggers back to africa.

clearly people aren't just going to turn underground and start bootlegging guns or making it themselves like during the prohibition era with alcohol 😷

what are you going to ban next? knives? fertilizer? propane tanks? cars? some arab killed 80 people in france with a truck. i guess trucks should be illegal too :feelsuhh:
phasing guns out is a slow and gradual process. it worked in europe, most people had guns around ww2.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18849 and Deleted member 16984
yes more laws will definitely stop the criminals who don't follow any laws :forcedsmile:
it doesnt stop the real criminals but people like this it could stop
 
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
europe doesn't have the second amendment, and they're retards because of it.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and MoggerGaston
it doesnt stop the real criminals but people like this it could stop
how do you know it would stop them? he could just build a bomb or drive a car into the kids walking home after school

gun control tards always think of everything existing in a vacuum
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 18159
He really tried boosting Europe like that's a good place. Cant you get arrested for looking at a girl for too long? Looksmaxxed has a point. Its already people doing stuff like 3d printing and creating Glock switches. All of that stuff is illegal. And banning guns will not stop people from killing. And when its all said and done people need to stop pretending all of these institutions are righteous as well. Like the government is really dedicated to righteousness or something.

I swear closet betas have no sense of the real world. Always needing someone to hold their nuts. Now i see why the media is so adamant on reporting these murder events, even though worst things happens everyday. People dont have any backbone. So ready to get stomped on when something bad happens. Just because people or children are killed, does not mean Its suddenly okay to take rights away from everyone. Naïveness and emotional thinking.

Reminds me of how a lower class persons solution to their financial problems is tax the rich. But the only thing that eventually happens is a tax to their ability to get rich.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell and looksmaxxed
He really tried boosting Europe like that's a good place. Cant you get arrested for looking at a girl for too long?
no?
how did you even get that idea
Its already people doing shit like 3d printing and creating glock switches. All of that stuff is illegal. And banning guns will not stop people from killing. And when its all said and done people need to stop pretending all of this institutionalized shit is righteous as well.
no shit you can still access guns if theyre illegal
but youre looking at population averages, the amount of ppl who would go out of their way to aquire guns illegally AND do a shooting is marginally lower than the amount of ppl who would do it if guns are legally and easily accesible
Lets me propose this then:
have piles of guns on every corner, but still have it illegal to shoot ppl
do you think the number of gun crimes would increase or no?
 
the statistics on mass shooters like this is abysmally low. why do you think they have to activate their mk ultras and stack them back to back like this? because despite the massive proliferation and relative ease of procuring guns in america, you still have a greater chance of being hit by lightning than being killed by a mass shooter. that's why they need to convince you muh gun crime is a serous problem like the other bogeymen they run on the news cycle like asian hate and muh white supremacy.

also most of these shootings occur in states with the strictest gun control. why is it that in arizona where you can carry guns around outside, people aren't getting into gunfights like the democrats suggest? or to take a european example, why does switzerland have the lowest crime rate despite almost everyone owning guns. meanwhile gun free uk is like a war zone

this gun control thing is like if man discovered fire, but it kept burning down the shelters, so instead of understanding and controlling it, the tribal elders just made it so nobody can ever use fire again. it's a mentality of fear, ignorance, and stupidity.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Meteor21, Richard_Hungwell, MoggerGaston and 2 others
no?
how did you even get that idea

no shit you can still access guns if theyre illegal
but youre looking at population averages, the amount of ppl who would go out of their way to aquire guns illegally AND do a shooting is marginally lower than the amount of ppl who would do it if guns are legally and easily accesible
Lets me propose this then:
have piles of guns on every corner, but still have it illegal to shoot ppl
do you think the number of gun crimes would increase or no?

Stop the nonsense.

And its deeper than just a handful of criminals. Like i said, you would be proposing a solution that affects multiple millions of peoples rights just for a isolated case. Guns exist already. People have guns, and criminals have guns. If you add a law like that criminals still would have guns. But people wont be able to get them anymore. This is like banning your average person from buying cane sugar. Sugar is bad for you, but its too fucking late. Your better off teaching them to not eat sugar and to love a sugarfree diet.

This guy who went into a middle school would have still found a way to get a gun and kill people regardless of how hard you would try to enforce your laws. I think your greatly underestimating the type of person who literally massacres children in cold blood. They dont give a fuck about your laws, nor do they care about your restrictions. Guns are not the only way to kill people. Not even the most common way for criminals anymore.

Your fairytale peaceful world with restrictions literally only work on those who are willing to follow those restrictions. Dont you get this?
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: looksmaxxed
thats just the UK, and even then its probably a total meme, jfl if u think they can enforce that
the article says only 1000 cases per year, year right, only 1000 men per year stare at women
 
Why did an 18 year old go to an ELEMENTARY school and shoot it up???

Why didn’t he shoot up the high school he went to?
You're assuming that mass shooters act in a logic way, but they're mentally ill

This Texas shooter was also a tranny schizo
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
Ban guns now.
 

Stop the nonsense.

And its deeper than just a handful of criminals. Like i said, you would be proposing a solution that affects multiple millions of peoples rights just for a isolated case. Guns exist already. People have guns, and criminals have guns. If you add a law like that criminals still would have guns. But people wont be able to get them anymore. This is like banning your average person from buying cane sugar. Sugar is bad for you, but its too fucking late. Your better off teaching them to not eat sugar and to love a sugarfree diet.

This guy who went into a middle school would have still found a way to get a gun and kill people regardless of how hard you would try to enforce your laws. I think your greatly underestimating the type of person who literally massacres children in cold blood. They dont give a fuck about your laws, nor do they care about your restrictions. Guns are not the only way to kill people. Not even the most common way for criminals anymore.

Your fairytale peaceful world with restrictions literally only work on those who are willing to follow those restrictions. Dont you get this?

If you ban guns they’ll most likely have to settle for knives which are super inefficient
 
Your typical high T criminal involved in organized crime is relatively rational and isnt going to shoot up dozens of civilians for sport
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
God bless the 2nd amendment
1623756651545
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Nautica, Shrek2OnDvD, never_lucky and 3 others
*Meeting in the Rothschild palace*

Jew: So we’ve managed to implement our mind control device into an 18 yr old high school student now he can shoot it up a high school and it will make sense for our disarming campaign so we can rule the world

Jew 2: Hmmm we’ve already tried that how about we make him kill his grandma and shoot up an elementary school instead for extra votes?

Jew: Great idea!
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Richard_Hungwell
If you ban guns they’ll most likely have to settle for knives which are super inefficient
But this isnt the middle ages. More like chemical warfare. And your forgetting the 3d printers.

High or low t has nothing to do with these behaviors. Yes your average mafia guy is not going to shoot up childrens for sport, but at the same time you shouldn't think that a person who really had the balls to do such crimes is an idiot. These aren't cripples or disabled people doing this. Just like how the guy shot up those minorities in the supermarket a few weeks back. Before he did it he wrote a whole 170+ page essay on white supremacy.

All im saying is that these people are far from normal. If this person did not have a gun, with the same thoughts, its no doubt that he still would have killed. Whether it be 3d printing, or doing some other crazy shit.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
Why are these mass shooters always low inhib enough to buy guns and shoot up a school, but not low inhib enough to talk to a girl and get their dick wet?

No low inhib for an ugly face
 
It makes sense, killing kids is easy
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
the criminal being autistic 18 y/o boy who is most likely too scared to talk to a girl (the standard school shooter type). jfl at thinking this guy would easily be able to access a gun if they were illegal.

why does this shit never happen in countries with gun regulation?


also this reasoning is extremely retarded. let's just not have any laws because criminals will break them anyway. cage at your non-existent critical thinking skills
You are a retarded cuck, He can easily get a gun even if it's illegal just by stealing it or buying one on the dark web with crypto
 
  • +1
Reactions: dreamcake1mo
because he was being gang stalked and fucked and harrased by the the government into commiting a mass shooting on an elementary school.
 
But this isnt the middle ages. More like chemical warfare. And your forgetting the 3d printers.

High or low t has nothing to do with these behaviors. Yes your average mafia guy is not going to shoot up childrens for sport, but at the same time you shouldn't think that a person who really had the balls to do such crimes is an idiot. These aren't cripples or disabled people doing this. Just like how the guy shot up those minorities in the supermarket a few weeks back. Before he did it he wrote a whole 170+ page essay on white supremacy.

All im saying is that these people are far from normal. If this person did not have a gun, with the same thoughts, its no doubt that he still would have killed. Whether it be 3d printing, or doing some other crazy shit.
Exactly if he couldn't buy a gun he would just buy the gun parts and build it over time or 3d print a gun. all these gun control faggots are retards
 
Exactly if he couldn't buy a gun he would just buy the gun parts and build it over time or 3d print a gun. all these gun control faggots are retards
Smh. Its too many of these dumbass people on the planet. They far outnumber the real ones.

If famous people died eating bread these people would try to witchunt anyone who has flour. Then you have the people with power who will create a law to ban the growth and sell of flour except for in locations that they own. People would be happy and even thank them for that, effectively monopolizing and greatening their power with public approval and support.

Also how to Stockholm syndrome 101.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
I’m not mad at the guy. He did what he was always destined to do. He had no choice, shit was written to happen before the first act. God writes the coolest story lines. I wonder what he wrote for me in the future.
 
You are a retarded cuck, He can easily get a gun even if it's illegal just by stealing it or buying one on the dark web with crypto
yeah that's why school shootings happen all the time in countries with gun regulation lmfao
 
  • +1
Reactions: Nautica and hebbewem
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
Just as always weak little faggots, why did the guy who shot up the supermarket not go to black neighborhoods and shoot them there? because he was a little bitch. Why didnt he shot up LGBT protests filled with feminists, cucks, faggots?
do you even bother doing a slight amount of research before speaking out of your ass? The shooter lived in a very white area and had to drive hours away to find a pocket of black people.
 
the criminal being autistic 18 y/o boy who is most likely too scared to talk to a girl (the standard school shooter type). jfl at thinking this guy would easily be able to access a gun if they were illegal.

why does this shit never happen in countries with gun regulation?


also this reasoning is extremely retarded. let's just not have any laws because criminals will break them anyway. cage at your non-existent critical thinking skills
just allow the government to have a monopoly on guns theory. that surely won’t turn out bad.
 
Why are these mass shooters always low inhib enough to buy guns and shoot up a school, but not low inhib enough to talk to a girl and get their dick wet?
9F68FB25 4E72 4696 8822 5A5AF7C08247
 
Banning guns isn’t gonna work. Murica needs to have some gu restrictions though, zoomers are crazy asf. Some stupid idiot even tried to stab someone in my school in Canada, if he had a gun he would have done worse
 

Similar threads

FiendFiend
Replies
5
Views
140
warcriminal003
warcriminal003
Aladin
Replies
27
Views
452
Lefty Rankin
L
J
Replies
4
Views
178
acm
acm
maladjusted88
Replies
7
Views
191
Arminus
Arminus

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top