0hMan
germano-gaelic gaunche - modführer
Staff
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2022
- Posts
- 4,224
- Reputation
- 9,626
I'm sure you've heard the stereotype about how white women that hook up with black guys are fat slags, etc. I'm also sure you've seen people on the forum say this isn't true and cherrypick. However, the stereotype that black-white mixed-race couples are typically black men hooking up with trashy, fat white women has a factual basis. For my studies, I've used the NLS' data. The National Longitudinal Surveys (NLS) are a family of surveys dedicated to tracking the labor market and other life experiences of American men and women. The surveys are paid for by the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The NLS collects extensive information on respondents' labor market behavior and educational experiences. The survey also includes data on the youths' family and community backgrounds to help researchers assess the impact of schooling and other environmental factors on these labor market entrants.
Now that I've explained my sources, I'll get straight into it.
Along with thousands of other variables, the NLS' website contains information on respondents' sexual partners, including race. What do we find when we compare white females who report black sexual partners to those who don't?
The former are fatter (mean BMI: 27.8 vs. 25.4), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 52.2 vs. 61.1), and bitchier. According to self-ratings, they are more argumentative: 3.72 vs. 3.84 (where 1 means argumentative and 5 means agreeable)
More difficult:
2.38 versus 2.13 (where 1 means cooperative and 5 means difficult)
More stubborn:
3.22 versus 2.84 (where 1 means flexible and 5 means stubborn)
Less dependable:
1.73 versus 1.60 (where 1 means dependable and 5 means undependable)
On top of this, they're also more likely to report they lie or cheat (lie or cheat only sometimes: 60.3% vs. 45.3%; lie or cheat often: 5.8% vs. 3.0%)
Since another common talking point on those who claim high quality white women are actively going for black men is that they end up having muh beautiful mulattos with them, I'll attempt to disprove that as well.
Those with mulatto children are even fatter (mean BMI: 29), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 45.9) and about as bitchy as the aforementioned examples.
Looking at data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which followed a different cohort, results are similar. White females who have ever had a black sexual partner are fatter (mean BMI: 28.8 vs. 26.2) and less intelligent (median ADD HEALTH Picture Vocabulary Test score: 99 vs. 105).
Additionally, rated by interviewers, they are less attractive (3.29 vs. 3.63, where 1 = extremely unattractive and 5 = extremely attractive) and have less attractive personalities (3.53 vs. 3.77) and worse grooming (3.31 vs. 3.61). Unsurprisingly, they are more likely to test positive for sexually transmitted diseases (4.3% vs. 1.8% for chlamydia; 7.2% vs. 1.0% positive for trichomoniasis).
Incidentally, they also have darker hair on average, refuting the fiction promoted by Jewish pornographers and sexually-frustrated Blacks that natural blondes are particularly apt to mix with blacks.
The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
Black 8.2%
Brown 5.0%
Blond 3.9%
Red 3.9%
Other studies show that whites are more likely to exclude blacks more than any other race, with one study showing that even in the most progressive and black-dominated cities (LA, NYC, ATL and Chicago), 92% of white women are likely to exclude blacks in their future partners, and only 4% exclude their own race (or only 4% are "BBC only" as trannies say)
Based off of studies, IRL experiences, and more, it seems that only the bottom 10% (with 10% being quite generous) of white women are actively going for black men. It’s fair to say the whole media industrial complex portrays the exact opposite of reality.
Stereotypes don’t materialize out of thin air. There’s a reason they exist. People notice patterns and formulate generalizations around those observed patterns.
In homogeneous societies, the most undesirable females are left without partners and go to their long dark death having failed to fulfill their genetic prime directive. End result: Humanity in such societies benefits as a whole from the eugenic cleansing. In late stage multicultural anti-societies, the slag of womanhood does an end-run around sexual selection and procreates outside their race. The question is put to the studio audience: Is this a net positive or net negative for those rainbow societies?
Now that I've explained my sources, I'll get straight into it.
Along with thousands of other variables, the NLS' website contains information on respondents' sexual partners, including race. What do we find when we compare white females who report black sexual partners to those who don't?
The former are fatter (mean BMI: 27.8 vs. 25.4), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 52.2 vs. 61.1), and bitchier. According to self-ratings, they are more argumentative: 3.72 vs. 3.84 (where 1 means argumentative and 5 means agreeable)
More difficult:
2.38 versus 2.13 (where 1 means cooperative and 5 means difficult)
More stubborn:
3.22 versus 2.84 (where 1 means flexible and 5 means stubborn)
Less dependable:
1.73 versus 1.60 (where 1 means dependable and 5 means undependable)
On top of this, they're also more likely to report they lie or cheat (lie or cheat only sometimes: 60.3% vs. 45.3%; lie or cheat often: 5.8% vs. 3.0%)
Since another common talking point on those who claim high quality white women are actively going for black men is that they end up having muh beautiful mulattos with them, I'll attempt to disprove that as well.
Those with mulatto children are even fatter (mean BMI: 29), dumber (median ASVAB math/verbal percentile: 45.9) and about as bitchy as the aforementioned examples.
Looking at data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which followed a different cohort, results are similar. White females who have ever had a black sexual partner are fatter (mean BMI: 28.8 vs. 26.2) and less intelligent (median ADD HEALTH Picture Vocabulary Test score: 99 vs. 105).
Additionally, rated by interviewers, they are less attractive (3.29 vs. 3.63, where 1 = extremely unattractive and 5 = extremely attractive) and have less attractive personalities (3.53 vs. 3.77) and worse grooming (3.31 vs. 3.61). Unsurprisingly, they are more likely to test positive for sexually transmitted diseases (4.3% vs. 1.8% for chlamydia; 7.2% vs. 1.0% positive for trichomoniasis).
Incidentally, they also have darker hair on average, refuting the fiction promoted by Jewish pornographers and sexually-frustrated Blacks that natural blondes are particularly apt to mix with blacks.
The percent of white females in this sample who report any black sex partner, by hair color:
Black 8.2%
Brown 5.0%
Blond 3.9%
Red 3.9%
Other studies show that whites are more likely to exclude blacks more than any other race, with one study showing that even in the most progressive and black-dominated cities (LA, NYC, ATL and Chicago), 92% of white women are likely to exclude blacks in their future partners, and only 4% exclude their own race (or only 4% are "BBC only" as trannies say)
Based off of studies, IRL experiences, and more, it seems that only the bottom 10% (with 10% being quite generous) of white women are actively going for black men. It’s fair to say the whole media industrial complex portrays the exact opposite of reality.
Stereotypes don’t materialize out of thin air. There’s a reason they exist. People notice patterns and formulate generalizations around those observed patterns.
In homogeneous societies, the most undesirable females are left without partners and go to their long dark death having failed to fulfill their genetic prime directive. End result: Humanity in such societies benefits as a whole from the eugenic cleansing. In late stage multicultural anti-societies, the slag of womanhood does an end-run around sexual selection and procreates outside their race. The question is put to the studio audience: Is this a net positive or net negative for those rainbow societies?
