The truth about most users

What is the data (to clarify, that's what I meant to ask)
Women on dating sites are conditioned to quite literally pick the top of the top; they will never see these folks usually and online candids or posed photos make their selection even more crueler. Women in person can be swayed by more than just a few pixels which lack the depth and perception you’d have in person.

They are incredibly harsh and selective on these sites and it has only gotten worse per half-a-decade of usage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
so basically its so over it doesnt matter what you do?
It's over if you are are retarded (average intelligence) and look like shit and also if both obviously
That men get extremely underrated there. Hypergamy shit
Stupid cope ratings are objective the users aren't, my ratings are good because I base them on the objective nature of looks and it should still reflect what rating YOU are or did people on here rate you subhuman or some shit, my rating of you was accurate

you don't compare yourself to the guy in your school or that boy you met at the bus station but view it in the grand perspective (that's what you should do, you aren't)

I guess that's what you mean with users underrating and I answered because it's bs
Women on dating sites are conditioned to quite literally pick the top of the top; they will never see these folks usually and online candids or posed photos make their selection even more crueler. Women in person can be swayed by more than just a few pixels which lack the depth and perception you’d have in person.

They are incredibly harsh and selective on these sites and it has only gotten worse per half-a-decade of usage.
human-induced hypergamy (what a way to say it, hypergamy is nature but humans decided to add another level to it lol)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Linus1888, d0wnpour_ and imontheloose
human-induced hypergamy (what a way to say it, hypergamy is nature but humans decided to add another level to it lol)
You’ll notice this yourself. The women you see online you’re more likely to criticise than those in-person: the in-person perception of others is fundamentally much different to that of even a candid shot. Could be hyper-analysis or the lack of human closeness; it’s hard to pinpoint without data.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
You’ll notice this yourself. The women you see online you’re more likely to criticise than those in-person: the in-person perception of others is fundamentally much different to that of even a candid shot. Could be hyper-analysis or the lack of human closeness; it’s hard to pinpoint without data.
Good that you point it out another reason why online dating is bs and I will keep staying away from it

online dating is high inhib shit because they're scared of social interactions lul

I think it's the lack of human closeness, people can only interpret so much into your "personality" (influenced by looks for the most part also in IRL, but obviously personality is a small but worth to note parameter that still exists) online so they use the only parameter given (your looks)

I don't think it's human made then unless there's another reason to it (it's just a lack of human closeness like you said)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Mihzar and imontheloose
Stupid cope ratings are objective the users aren't, my ratings are good because I base them on the objective nature of looks and it should still reflect what rating YOU are or did people on here rate you subhuman or some shit, my rating of you was accurate

you don't compare yourself to the guy in your school or that boy you met at the bus station but view it in the grand perspective (that's what you should do, you aren't)

I guess that's what you mean with users underrating and I answered because it's bs
Don’t make this about me man I was just explaining what’s going on on the dating apps lol.
MTN men on dating apps get treated as low ltns, that was my message
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: swapsocials and SlayerJonas
Good that you point it out another reason why online dating is bs and I will keep staying away from it

online dating is high inhib shit because they're scared of social interactions lul

I think it's the lack of human closeness, people can only interpret so much into your "personality" (influenced by looks for the most part also in IRL, but obviously personality is a small but worth to note parameter that still exists) online so they use the only parameter given (your looks)

I don't think it's human made then unless there's another reason to it (it's just a lack of human closeness like you said)
Your features usually appear better in person with true human perception rather than online shots that are super easy to hyper-analyse. It isn’t representative of how you truly look, even in candid; it’s why when you meet a celebrity or see them in person, you feel so much different to seeing them online. That human closeness is unique and “you look way better in person” always occurs unless you edit your online images. This of course means that all the GL fellas you see online do indeed look even better in-person.

That personality impression is usually a consequence of how they perceive your face. Some look like school shooters and others look jolly; you can actually test this yourself with two friends of yours if you really wish. It’s pretty fun to do your own experiments.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
Don’t make this about me man I was just explaining what’s going on on the dating apps lol.
MTN men on dating apps get treated as low ltns, that was my message
It isn't even negative your perception is based on your experiences that's why I'm using you as an example for your own reply

you don't even explain your message nor does it make sense
Your features usually appear better in person with true human perception rather than online shots that are super easy to hyper-analyse. It isn’t representative of how you truly look, even in candid; it’s why when you meet a celebrity or see them in person, you feel so much different to seeing them online. That human closeness is unique and “you look way better in person” always occurs unless you edit your online images. This of course means that all the GL fellas you see online do indeed look even better in-person.

That personality impression is usually a consequence of how they perceive your face. Some look like school shooters and others look jolly; you can actually test this yourself with two friends of yours if you really wish. It’s pretty fun to do your own experiments.
That's true but it doesn't justify saying there's some human-made algorithm in the app if that's what you meant to say a few replies back. It's just the blackpill like always.
 
  • +1
Reactions: imontheloose
It isn't even negative your perception is based on your experiences that's why I'm using you as an example for your own reply

you don't even explain your message nor does it make sense

That's true but it doesn't justify saying there's some human-made algorithm in the app if that's what you meant to say a few replies back. It's just the blackpill like always.
No, no. Not a human-made algorithm. It’s simply a natural consequence of what happens when you provide online images and tell people to rank them. This was likely unknown to the developers.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SlayerJonas
Is it really over if it never began?
 
It isn't even negative your perception is based on your experiences that's why I'm using you as an example for your own reply

you don't even explain your message nor does it make sense
I actually have no clue what you are talking about.

I’ve seen the stats and charts for the brutal Hypergamy shit. I’ve never used those apps.
 
  • +1
Reactions: swapsocials

Similar threads

noahwillascend
Replies
22
Views
530
Noahlooksmaxx
Noahlooksmaxx
tunisianropemaxxer
Replies
51
Views
776
chitarine
chitarine
SlayerJonas
Replies
124
Views
5K
adarsh arya
A
202
Replies
49
Views
836
Fkingigacope
F
InanimatePragmatist
Replies
57
Views
1K
pingu
pingu

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top