The truth about most users

[d0wnpour_]

This is addressed towards the majority of users, there are exceptions:

- Above ~50th percentile SMV

- Highly intelligent users with a healthy brain (neurotypicality is a synonym for a healthy brain)

- Some special deviations/abilities

Spoiler: What is intelligence?

Broad-spectrum of multiple parameters, e.g. creativity, logical reasoning, problem-solving, and empathy. Europeans mostly have a healthy mix of those parameters making them the superior race in that aspect besides looks objectively.

Your standpoint in life is a reflection of your social background, thoughts, and actions. You can either be born with a decent physical body thus live a comfortable life naturally or modify your body (transhumanism) by outperforming others with your mind.

Thoughts are a consequence of your brains individual anatomy. Most users are stupid and also neurodivergent, their actions represent that.

The only thing you can do is accept the hand (fate) you've been dealt.

What do you do now?

There is no escape because looksmaxxing is about doing the basics and surgery. It's also a holistic approach to life as you need money for surgery. No money equals no hardmaxxing and the basics won't ascend you significantly.

Roping isn't a solution as eternal suffering could await you in any form (this isn't about religion), don't risk it.

This means you're going to suffer anyway, so might as well start coping. Go eat goyslop, jerk off, play vidya and don't abstain from drugs. Get all the temporary dopamine because nothing will ever substitute for the lack of happiness that awaits you. "Real happiness" means nothing.

It's okay if you don't want to accept this as the truth. Just self-reflect and think about it, have your goals in life ever really been realistic?

Delusions (mental constructs) are putting chains on you, the truth means freedom. That's what this thread is about.

The universe is based on the concept of survival of the fittest and there isn't enough space at the top for everyone.

The strong always prevail over the weak.

Spoiler: Tags

@Eltrē @imontheloose @chadisbeingmade

so basically its so over it doesnt matter what you do?

 

[Linus1888]

What is the data (to clarify, that's what I meant to ask)

That men get extremely underrated there. Hypergamy shit

 

[imontheloose]

What is the data (to clarify, that's what I meant to ask)

Women on dating sites are conditioned to quite literally pick the top of the top; they will never see these folks usually and online candids or posed photos make their selection even more crueler. Women in person can be swayed by more than just a few pixels which lack the depth and perception you’d have in person.

They are incredibly harsh and selective on these sites and it has only gotten worse per half-a-decade of usage.

 

[SlayerJonas]

so basically its so over it doesnt matter what you do?

It's over if you are are retarded (average intelligence) and look like shit and also if both obviously

That men get extremely underrated there. Hypergamy shit

Stupid cope ratings are objective the users aren't, my ratings are good because I base them on the objective nature of looks and it should still reflect what rating YOU are or did people on here rate you subhuman or some shit, my rating of you was accurate

you don't compare yourself to the guy in your school or that boy you met at the bus station but view it in the grand perspective (that's what you should do, you aren't)

I guess that's what you mean with users underrating and I answered because it's bs

Women on dating sites are conditioned to quite literally pick the top of the top; they will never see these folks usually and online candids or posed photos make their selection even more crueler. Women in person can be swayed by more than just a few pixels which lack the depth and perception you’d have in person.

They are incredibly harsh and selective on these sites and it has only gotten worse per half-a-decade of usage.

human-induced hypergamy (what a way to say it, hypergamy is nature but humans decided to add another level to it lol)

 

[imontheloose]

human-induced hypergamy (what a way to say it, hypergamy is nature but humans decided to add another level to it lol)

You’ll notice this yourself. The women you see online you’re more likely to criticise than those in-person: the in-person perception of others is fundamentally much different to that of even a candid shot. Could be hyper-analysis or the lack of human closeness; it’s hard to pinpoint without data.

 

[SlayerJonas]

You’ll notice this yourself. The women you see online you’re more likely to criticise than those in-person: the in-person perception of others is fundamentally much different to that of even a candid shot. Could be hyper-analysis or the lack of human closeness; it’s hard to pinpoint without data.

Good that you point it out another reason why online dating is bs and I will keep staying away from it

online dating is high inhib shit because they're scared of social interactions lul

I think it's the lack of human closeness, people can only interpret so much into your "personality" (influenced by looks for the most part also in IRL, but obviously personality is a small but worth to note parameter that still exists) online so they use the only parameter given (your looks)

I don't think it's human made then unless there's another reason to it (it's just a lack of human closeness like you said)

 

[Linus1888]

Stupid cope ratings are objective the users aren't, my ratings are good because I base them on the objective nature of looks and it should still reflect what rating YOU are or did people on here rate you subhuman or some shit, my rating of you was accurate

you don't compare yourself to the guy in your school or that boy you met at the bus station but view it in the grand perspective (that's what you should do, you aren't)

I guess that's what you mean with users underrating and I answered because it's bs

Don’t make this about me man I was just explaining what’s going on on the dating apps lol.
MTN men on dating apps get treated as low ltns, that was my message

 

[imontheloose]

Good that you point it out another reason why online dating is bs and I will keep staying away from it

online dating is high inhib shit because they're scared of social interactions lul

I think it's the lack of human closeness, people can only interpret so much into your "personality" (influenced by looks for the most part also in IRL, but obviously personality is a small but worth to note parameter that still exists) online so they use the only parameter given (your looks)

I don't think it's human made then unless there's another reason to it (it's just a lack of human closeness like you said)

Your features usually appear better in person with true human perception rather than online shots that are super easy to hyper-analyse. It isn’t representative of how you truly look, even in candid; it’s why when you meet a celebrity or see them in person, you feel so much different to seeing them online. That human closeness is unique and “you look way better in person” always occurs unless you edit your online images. This of course means that all the GL fellas you see online do indeed look even better in-person.

That personality impression is usually a consequence of how they perceive your face. Some look like school shooters and others look jolly; you can actually test this yourself with two friends of yours if you really wish. It’s pretty fun to do your own experiments.

 

[SlayerJonas]

Don’t make this about me man I was just explaining what’s going on on the dating apps lol.
MTN men on dating apps get treated as low ltns, that was my message

It isn't even negative your perception is based on your experiences that's why I'm using you as an example for your own reply

you don't even explain your message nor does it make sense

Your features usually appear better in person with true human perception rather than online shots that are super easy to hyper-analyse. It isn’t representative of how you truly look, even in candid; it’s why when you meet a celebrity or see them in person, you feel so much different to seeing them online. That human closeness is unique and “you look way better in person” always occurs unless you edit your online images. This of course means that all the GL fellas you see online do indeed look even better in-person.

That personality impression is usually a consequence of how they perceive your face. Some look like school shooters and others look jolly; you can actually test this yourself with two friends of yours if you really wish. It’s pretty fun to do your own experiments.

That's true but it doesn't justify saying there's some human-made algorithm in the app if that's what you meant to say a few replies back. It's just the blackpill like always.

 

[imontheloose]

It isn't even negative your perception is based on your experiences that's why I'm using you as an example for your own reply

you don't even explain your message nor does it make sense

That's true but it doesn't justify saying there's some human-made algorithm in the app if that's what you meant to say a few replies back. It's just the blackpill like always.

No, no. Not a human-made algorithm. It’s simply a natural consequence of what happens when you provide online images and tell people to rank them. This was likely unknown to the developers.

 

[EuropeanChadmaxxer]

Is it really over if it never began?

 

[Linus1888]

It isn't even negative your perception is based on your experiences that's why I'm using you as an example for your own reply

you don't even explain your message nor does it make sense

I actually have no clue what you are talking about.

I’ve seen the stats and charts for the brutal Hypergamy shit. I’ve never used those apps.