the two most overrated facial features

[diditeverbegin]

Literally who are you

This is so real bruh
Randoms come out of the woodworks

 

[Eversor]

Ransoms come out of the woodworks

and destroy all of these self-proclaimed looksmax geniuses

 

[diditeverbegin]

and destroy all of these self-proclaimed looksmax geniuses

Go get em tiger

 

[yussimania]

I didn’t think you’d be so retarded.
Teeth.

not just teeth blud

Dentofacial and Skeletal Pattern in African Descendants from Southeastern Brazil: Clinical Prospective Study (2021)

SNA (maxillary position): African-Brazilian mean 88.51° ± 3.23°, Caucasian standard =82°, difference +6.51°, p < 0.001

SNB (mandibular position): African-Brazilian mean 85.06° ± 3.24°, Caucasian standard =80°, difference +5.06°, p < 0.001

ANB (maxilla-mandible relation): African- Brazilian mean 3.45º ± 2.46°, Caucasian standard =2-4°, slightly smaller or similar range, related variables p < 0.001

SN-Ar (cranial base deflection angle): African- Brazilian mean 119.87° ± 5.66°, Caucasian =125°, difference -5.13°, p <0.001

SN distance (anterior cranial base length): African-Brazilian mean 68.63 mm ± 4.50 mm, Caucasian =72 mm, difference -3.37 mm, p <0.001

TLDR it's skeletal not dental

 

[yussimania]

I wasnt saying it wasnt forward growth.

View attachment 4405855

You see how pattison has a significantly better side profile despite not having as much forward projection. cuz his central midface has better projection, i.e better midface convexity.

however central midface projection typically isnt what people are referring to when they talk about being forward grown.
imo this matters miles more.

oh yeah forgot about that i was getting too caught up with the anthropology and not the aesthetic one

 

[Eversor]

@Bryce whyd u stop maliciously arguing buddy?

 

[Bryce]

@Bryce whyd u stop maliciously arguing buddy?

Because you're an annoying random and make 0 valid points. And where tf did you get the word maliciously doesn't matter I'm DNRing your posts from here on out so feel to keep raging and spamming my notifs

 

[tightmason]

hollow cheeks
forward growth

literal rubbish indicators of attraction

no hollow cheeks or forward growth just pure chin dravidian power saar~!

 

[Eversor]

Because you're an annoying random and make 0 valid points. And where tf did you get the word maliciously doesn't matter I'm DNRing your posts from here on out so feel to keep raging and spamming my notifs

all of my points were valid and i destroyed u

 

[LegendaryKennen]

Everyone is clowning on you but i agree with you, look at matt bomer his forward growth is average at best, too bad everyone here is retarded

 

[Diᴏgenes]

He would look significantly better with more projection

no he wouldn't. It's perfect as is. That's why he looks good doing any expression like kissing, weird faces etc and looks sharp and elegant while talking

 

[jaaba]

hollow cheeks
forward growth

literal rubbish indicators of attraction

Are you mentally challenged perchance

 

[gario]

There are some truth in u post.

It really depends. Good forward growth can make u look chad from sideprofile view but it does nesccerly make u look good from front. Hollow cheek are also not automatic indication of good looks. I have seen plenty of guys that have hollow cheek but it does not anything for them. U literally need almost everything to look good.

 

[KT-34]

You are wrong and right at the same time

It depends


Delon doesn't have good forward growth and brad pitt doesn't have hollow cheeks yet they're both very attractive to women

But it's because of the unique combination of features they have


Harmony is LAW

 

[gario]

i HAVe good forward growth but my jaw is shaped like banana from fornt.

 

[Eversor]

Are you mentally challenged perchance

i am correct, low iq if u disagree