The Universal Slayer Phenotype - Highest Facial Appeal

[greycel]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:

When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

 

[Spiral]

Bro has a PhD in homosexuality

 

[greycel]

For example, look at Alessandro Dellisola when he goes clean shaven (adding more angularity to his jaw):

His appeal descends tragically, he just looks like a normal Chad now. He benefits from looksminning his jaw to highlight his GigaChad eye area even more. People subconsciously ignore lower thirds when looking at a person, if there is a light stubble (unless it is very groomed).
Just ask yourself, if the eyes were the first thing you saw when you looked at any of these pics.

 

[Rivers of Nihil]

high iq did read

 

[Deleted member 27442]

Neymar a slayer?

 

[greycel]

Neymar a slayer?

In those specific pics.

 

[SomaliMax]

high iq thread.

 

[xeqri]

i see what you mean but i think its deeper than that, for example do you really think if henry cavil had a striking eye area he would look worse than he is now? sounds unthinkable

 

[greycel]

i see what you mean but i think its deeper than that, for example do you really think if henry cavil had a striking eye area he would look worse than he is now? sounds unthinkable

I think you are partially right. The people I sent pictures of can still have their appeal to women increased by fine tuning how good one feature is relative to another.
Henry Cavill has enough room for improvement for his eye area, but he does not need to reach the level where it becomes striking. He would have higher appeal with a better eye area up to a point (a striking eye area will remove all facial averageness he currently has - it exceeds the line).

Amnesia made a morph on this:

Yes, he does look objectively better in the later pictures, but he would not have as high appeal, as a stage between the first 2 (where he still possesses an image of familiarity/ approachableness).

He reaches a level very close to his maximum in this picture:

Any more will just do him harm:

 

[xeqri]

I think you are partially right. The people I sent pictures of can still have their appeal to women increased by fine tuning how good one feature is relative to another.
Henry Cavill has enough room for improvement for his eye area, but he does not need to reach the level where it becomes striking. He would have higher appeal with a better eye area up to a point (a striking eye area will remove all facial averageness he currently has - it exceeds the line).

Amnesia made a morph on this:
View attachment 2814185

Yes, he does look objectively better in the later pictures, but he would not have as high appeal, as a stage between the first 2 (where he still possesses an image of familiarity/ approachableness).

He reaches a level very close to his maximum in this picture:
View attachment 2814208

Any more will just do him harm:
View attachment 2814213

thats a problem i guess only very few people will ever have lmao, also good morphs, but for henry in particular he would look so much better with striking almond eyes compared to hunter eyes, he has that good person vibe and hunter eyes just kinda make him look too intimidating

 

[xeqri]

I think you are partially right. The people I sent pictures of can still have their appeal to women increased by fine tuning how good one feature is relative to another.
Henry Cavill has enough room for improvement for his eye area, but he does not need to reach the level where it becomes striking. He would have higher appeal with a better eye area up to a point (a striking eye area will remove all facial averageness he currently has - it exceeds the line).

Amnesia made a morph on this:
View attachment 2814185

Yes, he does look objectively better in the later pictures, but he would not have as high appeal, as a stage between the first 2 (where he still possesses an image of familiarity/ approachableness).

He reaches a level very close to his maximum in this picture:
View attachment 2814208

Any more will just do him harm:
View attachment 2814213

also hernan drago, hes someone with seemingly no flaws

 

[smallman]

Whenever people talk about "appeal" or "best pheno" I don't see any evidence proving this. Yall are just projecting whatever you subjectively find looks good

 

[greycel]

Whenever people talk about "appeal" or "best pheno" I don't see any evidence proving this. Yall are just projecting whatever you subjectively find looks good

JustIgnoreMyEntirePost theory

These people are known to have the highest appeal (especially Dellisola: maybe highest in the world). I subjectively find striking, rarer, higher PSL faces like Depoot better. But ik the people I mentioned get simped on by millions of girls.

 

[disheartenedcel]

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

what is this guys name ? the one after neymar

 

[greycel]

what is this guys name ? the one after neymar

Burak Özçivit, incrediblely striking eye area. Turkish Chico

 

[terrygoldern]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

A user from here literaelly met Burak.

 

[reptiles]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

Just have an Alex schlab kinda face theory

 

[terrygoldern]

Burak Özçivit, incrediblely striking eye area. Turkish Chico

old poster from here zaynbrah with Turkish Actor Burak Ozcivit

not sure if anyone remembers the 2020 posters but this guy used to post here Found this plastered all over Burak Ozcivit fanpages Over for white boys

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 46427]

High iq. You actually thought outside of the box on this one. Refreshing from all the low energy, low iq copy and paste posts most people make. Bookmarked.

 

[NitoRump]

Res-fucking-pect. I cannot believe someone here is not a braindead autist and knows what real life appeal is

 

[BadmanGangstar]

Mabye one of the best threads ive ever read, very original

 

[Senssei]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

You have good points except your view on masculinity. Barret does not have a masculine look, he looks actually far less masculine than Cavill and Alessandro. He looks far more feminin than the average male.

 

[saggyballsackcel]

For example, look at Alessandro Dellisola when he goes clean shaven (adding more angularity to his jaw):
View attachment 2814094View attachment 2814096View attachment 2814097

His appeal descends tragically, he just looks like a normal Chad now. He benefits from looksminning his jaw to highlight his GigaChad eye area even more. People subconsciously ignore lower thirds when looking at a person, if there is a light stubble (unless it is very groomed).
Just ask yourself, if the eyes were the first thing you saw when you looked at any of these pics.

How come this is my first time finding this

 

[14717512]

For example, look at Alessandro Dellisola when he goes clean shaven (adding more angularity to his jaw):
View attachment 2814094View attachment 2814096View attachment 2814097

His appeal descends tragically, he just looks like a normal Chad now. He benefits from looksminning his jaw to highlight his GigaChad eye area even more. People subconsciously ignore lower thirds when looking at a person, if there is a light stubble (unless it is very groomed).
Just ask yourself, if the eyes were the first thing you saw when you looked at any of these pics.

he does not looksmin his jaw here. Just a full stubble itself is SMV multiplier. great thread anyways

 

[Deleted member 115987]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

that would be me

 

[14717512]

@greycel i cannot find your thread about strikingness vs averageness, but you imply there strikingness mogs once you prove you are NT comfy guy. I think its ideal to be high averageness with 2 striking features

 

[greycel]

@greycel i cannot find your thread about strikingness vs averageness, but you imply there strikingness mogs once you prove you are NT comfy guy. I think its ideal to be high averageness with 2 striking features

This one here?

Why High Averageness is good short-term, and Strikingness is better long-term?

High averageness will mean a guy is not stuck in the girl’s brain. They won’t remember his face. They will remember the idea of the guy being attractive, and that can work wonders as it forces them to be imaginative.. they’ll also remember him much more from seeing ppl who share similar features...

looksmax.org

Well the more striking you become, the harder it is for you to retain/possess high averageness
I used to think like that, about how many striking features there should be, but some people benefit from having 1 very striking, and others benefit from 3.
The only example of somebody with high averageness yet having strikingness I can think of is Delon, with his striking zygos

But the post above is a general rule of thumb, a correlation

 

[Johanjohan]

Bro has a PhD in homosexuality

Ye @greycel is gay, spending hours jerking off to other mens faces

 

[14717512]

Ye @greycel is gay, spending hours jerking off to other mens faces

go cope with nt you nordcuck

 

[igniteisbad]

interesting

 

[Johanjohan]

go cope with nt you nordcuck

Another homo

 

[greycel]

Another homo

 

[benchcrab]

basically ur saying an increase in psl is not an increase in appeal. An increase in psl helps to a certain point around 7/8 but not at the extremes, like drago, meeks, barret (post fag), and opry

 

[greycel]

basically ur saying an increase in psl is not an increase in appeal. An increase in psl helps to a certain point around 7/8 but not at the extremes, like drago, meeks, barret (post fag), and opry

Also that too high of a PSL will yield negative returns for Appeal (overall). Not just it becomes subjective but you start to suffer from success, from looking too good (too different to another human)

 

[benchcrab]

Also that too high of a PSL will yield negative returns for Appeal (overall). Not just it becomes subjective but you start to suffer from success, from looking too good (too different to another human)

what would you say the sweet spot is

 

[greycel]

what would you say the sweet spot is

It all depends per individual and how striking each of his features are, what makes them striking, whether that strikignness comes with drawbacks (e.g. too low trust), how it relates to his harmony etc etc

If I had to guess, I’d say (overall everything averaged) the people with the highest facial appeal in the world would be around Mid Chad-GigaChad PSL

7.5 PSL+: (Terra chad, beyond all PSL icons and chads) IRL morph tier, 1/ 250 000 000 - <20 alive
Example: Hernan Drago, Isaac Moreno. Prime Salludon (not even a joke, compare him to others side by side), Hexum

7 PSL+: (PSL icon) Worshipped here, 1/ 25 000 000 - <200 alive
Example: High tier example (7.25+ PSL) = Barrett, De Poot, Alfredo Hernandez De La Cruz, Gandy, Alexander Zanoza, Louis Allen III
Normal example (7+ PSL) = Atesh Salih, Jorge Del Rio, Tyson Ballou, O’ Pry, Meeks, Henry Cavill, Massimo Del Sante

6.75 PSL+: (Giga chad) Once a lifetime you'll see one, 1/ 1 000 000 - <4000 alive
Example: Ian sommerhalder, Francsisco Lachowski, Zach Cox, Jeff Seid, Allesandro Dellisola, Simonas Pham

6.5 PSL+: (High chad) Once every few years you'll see one, 1/ 50 000 - <80000 alive
Example: Saafiir, Kaden Hammond, Colton Haynes, Sam Dezz

6 PSL+: (Chad) Few times a year sighting if you live in a busy city, 1/ 2 000 - <2 000 000 alive
Example: Mid tier chad example (6.25+ PSL) = Zayn Malik, Amnesia, Damian Kater, Alain Delon
Low tier chad example (6+ PSL) = Lorenzo Zurzolo, Alan Ritchson

 

[Deleted member 117142]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

Neymar Slayer in mumbai

 

[shehzadgillani]

high iq thread, averaginess with a rare feature always slay

 

[htbslayer]

Neymar a slayer?

appealmaxxed pretty boy.
can stole your bitch in a second btw

 

[zaebalsya]

What makes Elias De Poot unappealing? Is it too much pct or hooded eyes?

 

[zaebalsya]

I hate to realize that girls like these eyes way more than hooded ones. I'm thinking about getting a fucking blepharoplasty cuz of it

 

[Deleted member 117142]

View attachment 3911820View attachment 3911821
I hate to realize that girls like these eyes way more than hooded ones. I'm thinking about getting a fucking blepharoplasty cuz of it

Tom Welling is a universal Slayer Appeal

 

[Deleted member 86877]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

I look like neymar kinda

 

[manletfuel]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

Breaking: things we already knew

 

[greycel]

Breaking: things we already knew

?
Pretty much everybody on this thread disagrees with you, and says this thread is refreshing. It might make logical sense to you now you've read it, but you weren't capable enough to connect all the dots

You never knew importance of striking vs non striking on face, because you never bothered considering it. And how the highest appeal =/= strikingness everywhere

 

[greycel]

View attachment 3911820View attachment 3911821
I hate to realize that girls like these eyes way more than hooded ones. I'm thinking about getting a fucking blepharoplasty cuz of it

Only if you have sufficient bonemass + angularity + striking features too

 

[manletfuel]

?
Pretty much everybody on this thread disagrees with you, and says this thread is refreshing. It might make logical sense to you now you've read it, but you weren't capable enough to connect all the dots

You never knew importance of striking vs non striking on face, because you never bothered considering it. And how the highest appeal =/= strikingness everywhere

dili

 

[Mrinfinityx]

I have encountered lots of pictures of models/ actors etc, and we use PSL as a definitive guide for an increase in PSL leads to an increase in Appeal. However, we know there are outliers to this case where groomed men with "lower PSL features" (most "masculine" tiktokers) have a higher appeal to women, than other high PSL models (Barett/ Depoot).
I feel when a person looks like this, they incite the most appeal to a woman:
View attachment 2813939View attachment 2813940

View attachment 2813942View attachment 2813983

View attachment 2814009
View attachment 2814010

So what makes this combination so deadly. It's the combination of the following:
- sharp eye area
- facial leanness
- jet black/ dark hair
- light stubble or clean shaven
- good skin and colouring (red undertones and acene free).
- messy hair thats groomed well

Interesingly jaw doesn't matter as much, the mandible just needs to be sharp - above average. Also zygos do not need to be protruding, contrary to popular belief (in fact low mass is preferred). I think this is because striking cheekbones takes away the GigaHalo from the eye area.

What I'm trying to get at, is someone who looks masculine and has supposedly everything striking, like Barrett:
View attachment 2814040
When you look at him, there is too much going on and your brain does not pick out one specific feature. You instead are scanning his face for a longer time looking at everything. You do come to the conclusion that he is objectively more attractive, but you are less attracted to him (girl POV).

For appeal, its essentially good to have a juxtaposition betweeen how good two very close features are (eyes and zygos/ lips and jaw etc)... because it ends up highlighting one much more than the other psychologically. And the eye area is the best feature to outweigh all others. As long as the others are average/ above average.

This is interesting because instead of a debate of a mixture of Masculine and Feminine features, it's one more of Striking vs Non striking - Higher averageness (where both are masculine).

You see the same for other people, like Vinnie Hacker who have a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but average eyes:
View attachment 2814058View attachment 2814062

...or Henry Cavill who has a striking Jaw and striking Zygos but above average eyes:
View attachment 2814064
View attachment 2814067

The secret to appeal is contrast between the positive "rareness" of features with one another (how striking) - assuming there are 0 flaws.
When you try striving for true perfection, you end up steering further away from it's benefits.

Will read again later, maybe it is not that bad for my face