BWC_virgin
JB pussy stretcher 4000
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2024
- Posts
- 1,399
- Reputation
- 1,940
simple things dont add up
take for instance, if we consider a country, this country must make a certain ammount of food. a certain ammount of machine parts. a certain ammount of buildings. a certain ammount of skilled service jobs. etc...
at some point the country will have enough of these things. everyone has breakfast, a car, a house, a doctor, etc...
certainly 50-60 years ago, in the 1960s and 70s, american standard of living was very adiquate.
since this time the number of people in the workforce has increased signficantly. with women working more for example, and the working population is working more on average.
consider also the according to statistics. the worker effeicency, bieng the ammount of value generated per hour of labor has doubled in this time.
according to these facts we would assume the total value generated per capita is at least double what it was 50-60 years ago (rough figures).
so what then is the problem. why is it significantly harder for someone to secure a good quality of life on a median wage.
it is simply impossible that this much value is bieng generated. therefore the worker efficency statistic is either wrong or misleading. as we can be pretty sure of the quantity of work.
it should not be however. the tools, methods, automation, etc... of today multiplies the production of almost everything. corn yield from a single acre has quadrupled since 1950. production speed of machine parts has increased tenfold.
so what are people doing?
if each hour of work adds twice the economic value. and there are more hours of work, why isnt there at least twice whatever we had in 1960.
whatever people do everyday for 8 hours 5 days a week they should be doing maybe 2 or 3 times that today.
so where is it.
take for instance, if we consider a country, this country must make a certain ammount of food. a certain ammount of machine parts. a certain ammount of buildings. a certain ammount of skilled service jobs. etc...
at some point the country will have enough of these things. everyone has breakfast, a car, a house, a doctor, etc...
certainly 50-60 years ago, in the 1960s and 70s, american standard of living was very adiquate.
since this time the number of people in the workforce has increased signficantly. with women working more for example, and the working population is working more on average.
consider also the according to statistics. the worker effeicency, bieng the ammount of value generated per hour of labor has doubled in this time.
according to these facts we would assume the total value generated per capita is at least double what it was 50-60 years ago (rough figures).
so what then is the problem. why is it significantly harder for someone to secure a good quality of life on a median wage.
it is simply impossible that this much value is bieng generated. therefore the worker efficency statistic is either wrong or misleading. as we can be pretty sure of the quantity of work.
it should not be however. the tools, methods, automation, etc... of today multiplies the production of almost everything. corn yield from a single acre has quadrupled since 1950. production speed of machine parts has increased tenfold.
so what are people doing?
if each hour of work adds twice the economic value. and there are more hours of work, why isnt there at least twice whatever we had in 1960.
whatever people do everyday for 8 hours 5 days a week they should be doing maybe 2 or 3 times that today.
so where is it.
