The US would dominate in soccer if its popularity was swapped with American football

Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Fire
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
18,024
Reputation
25,214
This point is frequently discussed on other platforms, but I've yet to see it discussed on a :blackpill: forum.

The US already dominates in international athleticism, despite siphoning off many of its major athletes into American football.

Despite the national teams of Brazil, Germany, Argentina, France, Belgium, etc. seeming dominant at an international level, they would all probably get squashed with the aforementioned condition being true.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: Chadethnic101, Deleted member 18924, Oberyn and 4 others
but soccer isnt about being 6'4 black and taking roids
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: to be human, Chadethnic101, ReadBooksEveryday and 19 others
But it would never be because we americans are not soys.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4362 and Deleted member 16984
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1332, currylightskin and Deleted member 16984
but soccer isnt about being 6'4 black and taking roids
Pure cope. If athletes like Allen Iverson, Floyd Mayweather, Roy Jones Jr, Steph Curry, Barry Sanders etc. Played soccer since they were kids, the US would win every 4 years.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 24293, to be human, Deleted member 4362 and 6 others
but soccer isnt about being 6'4 black and taking roids
Caged at this post
joe-biden-head-shake.gif
 
  • +1
Reactions: EdouardManlet and Marsiere214
This seems so obvious to me I was tempted to "water" the thread. But apparently some people don't see it. There are 320,000,000 (fucking) people in the US, there is no way some country with a population of 50,000,000, half of whom live in poverty and are malnourished, can compete with that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8355, Oberyn, Marsiere214 and 1 other person
This is true lmao. If america invested 5 dollars in football they would dominate
 
Goofball is extremely gay and feminine, legitimate truecel sport.
 
This seems so obvious to me I was tempted to "water" the thread. But apparently some people don't see it. There are 320,000,000 (fucking) people in the US, there is no way some country with a population of 50,000,000, half of whom live in poverty and are malnourished, can compete with that.
china has 1.4 billion people and india has 1.38 billion and they have never won anything, cope.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Chadethnic101, Deleted member 16984, Oberyn and 1 other person
What the us needs to do is Minecraft all its n words
Minecraft all the j words
Minecraft india
Minecraft the CCP and make china capitalist country
 
  • JFL
Reactions: gamma
This is true lmao. If america invested 5 dollars in football they would dominate
The US does invest in soccer. High school playoff games can end up with higher attendances than European U-23 games. Playing soccer in high school means that you get to leech off of the ridiculously expensive stadiums, amenities, and training equipment from the football team during their off season. The issue is that the football staff can completely bully the soccer staff in terms of recruiting players. Head high school football coaches earn nearly as much as the principal (they're typically the second highest paid faculty member at the school).
 
china has 1.4 billion people and india has 1.38 billion and they have never won anything, cope.
Because their gene pools are garbage for athleticism. Most of India is effectively below the poverty line too.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24293 and Heguldus
but soccer isnt about being 6'4 black and taking roids
Professional sports is FULL of athletes taking performance enhancing drugs, that isn't limited to American football
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24293
Professional sports is FULL of athletes taking performance enhancing drugs, that isn't limited to American football
my point was its not really so dependent on the factors that american sports tend to be like pure athleticism, size, strenght, speed etc

Its more based around precision, control and technique

DK metcalf can be as big and as strong as he wants, if he has a first touch like a trampoline, then phil foden will run rings around him all day depsite being a literal child in comparison.

The traits that make a good NFL player dont automatically translate to soccer- so you cant just use the excuse oh all our best atheltes play in the NFL, when plenty of top international players are too scrawny for a high school football team let alone college or NFL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1332
This point is frequently discussed on other platforms, but I've yet to see it discussed on a :blackpill: forum.

The US already dominates in international athleticism, despite siphoning off many of its major athletes into American football.

Despite the national teams of Brazil, Germany, Argentina, France, Belgium, etc. seeming dominant at an international level, they would all probably get squashed with the aforementioned condition being true.
Not so sure. America can usually compete with disgusting money but footballers already make shitloads so not sure if they could keep or attract talent.
 
my point was its not really so dependent on the factors that american sports tend to be like pure athleticism, size, strenght, speed etc

Its more based around precision, control and technique

DK metcalf can be as big and as strong as he wants, if he has a first touch like a trampoline, then phil foden will run rings around him all day depsite being a literal child in comparison.

The traits that make a good NFL player dont automatically translate to soccer- so you cant just use the excuse oh all our best atheltes play in the NFL, when plenty of top international players are too scrawny for a high school football team let alone college or NFL
The US isn't inherently disadvantaged when it comes to its skill baseline for soccer. Most running backs have the footwork and agility necessary to be a good dribbler. Also, many boys are pushed into American football rather than soccer, which means that, even if they end up as a bust for American football, their soccer potential was never explored.
 
Not so sure. America can usually compete with disgusting money but footballers already make shitloads so not sure if they could keep or attract talent.
The top NFL salaries slightly exceed the top PL salaries. The post was about the international level, not club, so your point is irrelevant regardless.
 
Last edited:
The US isn't inherently disadvantaged when it comes to its skill baseline for soccer. Most running backs have the footwork and agility necessary to be a good dribbler. Also, many boys are pushed into American football rather than soccer, which means that, even if they end up as a bust for American football, their soccer potential was never explored.
running backs tend to have good footwork and agility, but they alos tend to be very very jacked and those bodytypes dont lend well to endurance. The only footballer i can think of with that kind of physique is adama traore- and hes literally known for having garbage end product.

Even footwork and agility pale in comparison to factors like spatial awareness, first touch, composure etc. Its one thing to be agile and another thing to be agile with the ball at your feet, its more difficutl than most think
 
running backs tend to have good footwork and agility, but they alos tend to be very very jacked and those bodytypes dont lend well to endurance. The only footballer i can think of with that kind of physique is adama traore- and hes literally known for having garbage end product.

Even footwork and agility pale in comparison to factors like spatial awareness, first touch, composure etc. Its one thing to be agile and another thing to be agile with the ball at your feet, its more difficutl than most think
They're intentionally jacked for the sport. Any of them can easily lessen their exogenous androgen intake and stop lifting as much to slim down for soccer.

You've also conveniently ignored my initial point:
The US isn't inherently disadvantaged when it comes to its skill baseline for soccer.
 
They're intentionally jacked for the sport. Any of them can easily lessen their exogenous androgen intake and stop lifting as much to slim down for soccer.

You've also conveniently ignored my initial point:
I would agree its not disadvantaged - I just dont think the same sort of athleticism required for american sports is the same as for soccer. A lot of PL footballers arent really that impressive in terms of natural athleticism- theyre really quite average, they have excellent first touch, awareness and control of the ball. If you lack the aformentioned characteristics no amount of athleticism will ever compensate for it
 
I just dont think the same sort of athleticism required for american sports is the same as for soccer.
I only slightly agree with this, and your initial comment is seemingly implying that the US wouldn't be dominating with the aforementioned conditions. Again, I'm not denying that the sports don't have perfect overlap, but the massive football pipeline that exists in the US squashes a lot of soccer potential.
 
my point was its not really so dependent on the factors that american sports tend to be like pure athleticism, size, strenght, speed etc

Its more based around precision, control and technique

DK metcalf can be as big and as strong as he wants, if he has a first touch like a trampoline, then phil foden will run rings around him all day depsite being a literal child in comparison.

The traits that make a good NFL player dont automatically translate to soccer- so you cant just use the excuse oh all our best atheltes play in the NFL, when plenty of top international players are too scrawny for a high school football team let alone college or NFL
I see your point and totally agree

Just saying PED usage among all pro athletes is probably much more widespread than any of us actually know
 
This seems so obvious to me I was tempted to "water" the thread. But apparently some people don't see it. There are 320,000,000 (fucking) people in the US, there is no way some country with a population of 50,000,000, half of whom live in poverty and are malnourished, can compete with that.
That's the exactly same logic that is making Americans suck at football/soccer

You all think it's about being rich and have all resources. Your national team has top tier budgets but cant win a team made by malnourished third worlders like El Salvador.

And football is all about skills that are developed over years, not only talent or being big, stronger or whatever. Kids be playing this everyday until they grow up in those countries. It's a fairly cheap sport where it's mostly about agility and team work. There's no fucking roided quarterback taking all the glory and everyone else is a fucking npc, it's a team working together

Even back then, you had tiny little poor countries winning over big European teams. We can't even say if that's possible in American football because it's expensive, dangerous and no one likes that shit outside america
 
That's the exactly same logic that is making Americans suck at football/soccer
The American team sucks at soccer because most of their athletic talent is not pushed into soccer.
 
Soccer is med/latino sport. Spain, Italy, Brazil, Argentina >>>
Despite the national teams of Brazil, Germany, Argentina, France, Belgium, etc. seeming dominant at an international level
Belgium dominates cocks
Not a single competition won but muh they're strong in FIFA :feelsuhh:
 
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and Oberyn
All hypothesis and daydreaming
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
You clearly didn't click the first link.
France under 23 can suck our cocks
Who fucking cares of under 23 and other irrilevant fifa niggas :feelsuhh:

It's all about Messi and Ronaldo, the goats
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
France under 23 can suck our cocks
Who fucking cares of under 23 and other irrilevant fifa niggas :feelsuhh:

It's all about Messi and Ronaldo, the goats
Italy needs more black players if they're planning on qualifying for the next World Cup.
TELEMMGLPICT000168948016_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpVlberWd9EgFPZtcLiMQfyf2A9a6I9YchsjMeADBa08.jpeg
 
Italy needs more black players if they're planning on qualifying for the next World Cup.
TELEMMGLPICT000168948016_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpVlberWd9EgFPZtcLiMQfyf2A9a6I9YchsjMeADBa08.jpeg
Remind me again who won last euro competition :feelsgood::feelsgood::feelsgood::feelsgood::feelsgood:

Meanwhile France lost against fucking Switzerland lmaoo
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and Oberyn
A med or latin country is gonna win next world cup WRITE THAT DOWN

And not frenchniggers
 
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and Oberyn
A med or latin country is gonna win next world cup WRITE THAT DOWN

And not frenchniggers
You and others are going off the rails with blacks in soccer, which wasn't the point of the post (even though blacks are statistically overrepresented at the top levels of the sport). Even with a fully "white" squad, the US would still be dominating with the aforementioned conditions.
 
This point is frequently discussed on other platforms, but I've yet to see it discussed on a :blackpill: forum.

The US already dominates in international athleticism, despite siphoning off many of its major athletes into American football.

Despite the national teams of Brazil, Germany, Argentina, France, Belgium, etc. seeming dominant at an international level, they would all probably get squashed with the aforementioned condition being true.
Entire usa olympic team are black jfl.
 

Similar threads

try2beme
Replies
3
Views
34
boostlock
boostlock
mr007
Replies
0
Views
21
mr007
mr007
Viriato_catholic
Replies
22
Views
93
dragomog
dragomog
DoNotResusciate
Replies
2
Views
28
DoNotResusciate
DoNotResusciate
Viriato_catholic
Replies
13
Views
78
Viriato_catholic
Viriato_catholic

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top