
TheStonerOne
Bronze
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2025
- Posts
- 273
- Reputation
- 276
Out of all the countries in Europe, only the UK, Ireland and Malta (why
) take statistics on "race/skin colour". Notice any similarities between the three? Whereas Italy and France don't take statistics on "race/skin colour" or "ethnicity".
Why would Europe impose odd Anglosphere concepts on itself? Only the English speaking world cares about these opaque, misleading concepts. Although Northern Europeans in general used racial concepts of "whiteness", that eventually was confined to the Anglosphere especially the USA but wasn't eradicated in the UK and Ireland.
By and large, most people outside of the UK and Ireland would NEVER call themselves by "their" skin colour. Even Maltese only have "racial statistics" due to British colonialism. Because let's be frank; taking one good look at the overwhelming majority of Maltese sure as hell doesn't cluster them with the English! It's not even slightly difficult to distinguish the average Maltese from the average Brit and we have studies showing large genetic distances between the two which indicates that the British had no real genetic affect on Malta. Maltese genomes are more in line with North African Jews.
Even "inclusivist" white supremacists stop at Maltese EVEN if they accept Southern Italians (which shows how fucking retarded they are since Maltese are very genetically similar to Southern Italians).
It seems that the idea of "race" being a concept is confined to the Anglosphere. I will still use "Anglo-Nordic" because some overlap is needed due to the physical and genetic homogenity of much of Northern Europe, but in reality, this is an Anglosphere cancer.

Why would Europe impose odd Anglosphere concepts on itself? Only the English speaking world cares about these opaque, misleading concepts. Although Northern Europeans in general used racial concepts of "whiteness", that eventually was confined to the Anglosphere especially the USA but wasn't eradicated in the UK and Ireland.
By and large, most people outside of the UK and Ireland would NEVER call themselves by "their" skin colour. Even Maltese only have "racial statistics" due to British colonialism. Because let's be frank; taking one good look at the overwhelming majority of Maltese sure as hell doesn't cluster them with the English! It's not even slightly difficult to distinguish the average Maltese from the average Brit and we have studies showing large genetic distances between the two which indicates that the British had no real genetic affect on Malta. Maltese genomes are more in line with North African Jews.
Even "inclusivist" white supremacists stop at Maltese EVEN if they accept Southern Italians (which shows how fucking retarded they are since Maltese are very genetically similar to Southern Italians).
It seems that the idea of "race" being a concept is confined to the Anglosphere. I will still use "Anglo-Nordic" because some overlap is needed due to the physical and genetic homogenity of much of Northern Europe, but in reality, this is an Anglosphere cancer.