There are roles for most of us

[wollet2]

Your looks dictate what roles you can play and what you can be.

You know the guy women say "hes not that good looking idk what i found in him" , but they still cut their wrists for? He got the right looks to be allowed to play this role that ultimately his personality-behaviour nails.

Oofy doofies like Pete Davidson have the right looks for this role and if you think differently you are a retard. Oofy doofy is still a very generalised role.

Unless youre not a handicapped autist stop spewing muh nt cringe shit.

You can call it pheno or w.e but its everything. Its your identity. If you cant get women while putting effort its prolly over for you and you got a incel identity - pheno

 

[stevielake]

non NT and black = over.

 

[Chasseur]

I'm a petty thug whose role is to be brutally beaten by main hero

 

[IncelsBraincels]

I didn't understand a single sentence in this post

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Truth is everyone has a identity and role they can fallback on. What you speak of is media and popular personas. Being a NT means following the acceptable popular media personas.

Like the overly obnoxious simp boomer family guy. Or like what you said, the offy doofy, or the emo tiktok twink, or the Thugmaxxed rapper etc. Theres even a role for the literal disabled status/moneymaxxed human. You can literally be as ugly as u want and still be haloed if you decide to model your base look based on a popular persona.

Lots of people here get slaying confused with commitment also. Commitment is another beast that many wont get regardless if chad or not because its a worldwide issue bigger than looks, but when it comes to fucking females? Just follow the niche. I know indians who have thugmaxxed with earrings, or tats or some who have fit the buisnessman trope and slay. I also know a worryingly amount of pure asthetic chads who never had a girlfriend, and even more that still marry woman who cheat.

We people of this forum have to make a clear difference. Because it seems a lot of people here claim that the reason they cant "slay" is because they have some sort of inherit specialty when in reality its either they are not intelligent enough to understand this, or for reason do not want to participate (which is fine).

 

[wollet2]

Truth is everyone has a identity and role they can fallback on. What you speak of is media and popular personas. Being a NT means following the acceptable popular media personas.

Like the overly obnoxious simp boomer family guy. Or like what you said, the offy doofy, or the emo tiktok twink, or the Thugmaxxed rapper etc. Theres even a role for the literal disabled status/moneymaxxed human. You can literally be as ugly as u want and still be haloed if you decide to model your base look based on a popular persona.

Lots of people here get slaying confused with commitment also. Commitment is another beast that many wont get regardless if chad or not because its a worldwide issue bigger than looks, but when it comes to fucking females? Just follow the niche. I know indians who have thugmaxxed with earrings, or tats or some who have fit the buisnessman trope and slay. I also know a worryingly amount of pure asthetic chads who never had a girlfriend, and even more that still marry woman who cheat.

We people of this forum have to make a clear difference. Because it seems a lot of people here claim that the reason they cant "slay" is because they have some sort of inherit specialty when in reality its either they are not intelligent enough to understand this, or for reason do not want to participate (which is fine).

Some of those roles can be derived from everyday life.
It depends on whos having success with the girls, people here will always account a guy's success with "subpar looks for the forum" only to his nt or status and ignore his pheno. Also not everyone can copy the same nt behaviour (or feel the same inside and have that externalise into the behaviour) and expect the same results with the same face height voice etc. Some nts are viewed as clowns and dont get girls. Its not that they dont look good enough. You can look "enough" (or just a mtn that would be haloed by acting a different way) and still act out of ur role and be seen as a cringe joke

I dont think you can model your look based on a famous persona and be haloed unless its an attractive persona. And like i said you have to have the right looks for that. Not everyone is meant to get girls.

 

[dreamcake1mo]

Some of those roles can be derived from everyday life.
It depends on whos having success with the girls, people here will always account a guy's success with "subpar looks for the forum" only to his nt or status and ignore his pheno. Also not everyone can copy the same nt behaviour (or feel the same inside and have that externalise into the behaviour) and expect the same results with the same face height voice etc. Some nts are viewed as clowns and dont get girls. Its not that they dont look good enough. You can look "enough" (or just a mtn that would be haloed by acting a different way) and still act out of ur role and be seen as a cringe joke

I dont think you can model your look based on a famous persona and be haloed unless its an attractive persona. And like i said you have to have the right looks for that. Not everyone is meant to get girls.

True.

When i say famous i mean well known. Modern culture has introduced and popularized "Cringe' which makes it harder to cling to a well accepted persona without looking like a tryhard, but i feel like its more of a try and test thing. As in, you cant just try to thugmaxx as an Indian the whole way, and if you do you cant just try to talk to spade beckys like how the bbc do. You might have to tailor your target demographic and make sure to keep it subtle. Even if so though, said persons would have marginally more success trying to fit the banker or businessman trope.

When it comes to tropes not freshly reinstated as being growingly popular for your demographic, subtleness is key due to cringe. But in the end i feel like due to media a lot more known and popularly acceptable personas are within human society. The options are very vast which makes it hard to believe someone is not truly able to find a halo unless they are either intellectually incapable, not motivated enough to actually do so, or severely disabled looks wise.

But obviously for a good looking person it will be easier in almost all ways to find acceptable tropes to fit into. Blackpill or lookism truths still remain nonetheless.