There is literally zero reason to get a job now

[disillusioned]

Jfl at wagecucks. Automation and AI will take your job within the next 10-30 years.

Enjoy being a wageslave only to end up sucking on teh same welfare that the "losers" were already using decades prior, without getting anything extra. Whatever money you "saved" will be eaten by inflation and eventually your income will be reduced to the same amount as everybody else is getting via UBI. You will enjoy the same shitty standard poverty living as everybody else while the rich live in a high tech robot utopia.

 

[Deleted member 5542]

 

[Deleted member 8576]

You will enjoy the same shitty standard poverty living as everybody else while the rich live in a high tech robot utopia.

brootal

 

[sytyl]

just be a doomer and ldar theory

 

[Bewusst]

Lifefuel for social welfare ldarcels like me

 

[Vermilioncore]

Jobs me

 

[wasted]

View attachment 649514

Good uname I can relate

 

[JosephGarrot123]

just dont do anything theory

 

[goat2x]

so what the fuck are you gonna do for a living

 

[goat2x]

its like saying
"why life your life you gonna die anyways" lol

 

[Blackout.xl]

so what the fuck are you gonna do for a living

Rot and sex

 

[goat2x]

Rot and sex

i would hardly doubt that op can do the 2nd option

 

[Deleted member 5431]

If you can try to ecsape the 9 to 5 cycle it’s hell coming from a former amazon employee. If not it’s time to cope.

 

[Bewusst]

If you can try to ecsape the 9 to 5 cycle it’s hell coming from a former amazon employee. If not it’s time to cope.

Better than the increasingly common alternate shift systems

 

[balding17yomanletcel]

Jobs me

Your avi, rots me.

 

[Deleted member 4430]

Automation and AI will take your job within the next 10-30 years.

 

[Deleted member 275]

You realize we are all going to be exterminated once we are no longer usefull and robots replace us right?

JFL at thinking they are going to use robots to improve our standard of living and give us more leisure. You can already see with the increased productivity but stagnating wages, that this is not the case.

Once most humans are no longer usefull, most humans will no longer be allowed to live.

This will all happen after I am already dead though. Maybe towards the end of this century. I am not too worried about it. There will just be a bigger divide between rich and poor, eventually leading to a collapse after I am already dead.

 

[BrettyBoy]

XD

 

[Deleted member 4106]

cope, has several jobs that will not be automatic

 

[disillusioned]

You realize we are all going to be exterminated once we are no longer usefull and robots replace us right?

Possibly, but there are a few things to keep in mind:

1. It's questionable if soldiers will ever be fully automated. Unlike work robots, soldiers need to be able to do various things that a machine might not be able to emulate even if for no other reason than mere physics.

2. It is possible that massive social unrest will actually just result in collapse before it gets to that point. There is already growing radicalism in the west and we aren't even close to large scale automation yet. This is on top on all the other social problems such as growing racial tensions.

3. It is more likely they will attempt passive methods of population removal rather than death camps, like "medicine" that sterilize a huge portion of the population.

 

[Deleted member 275]

Possibly, but there are a few things to keep in mind:

1. It's questionable if soldiers will ever be fully automated. Unlike work robots, soldiers need to be able to do various things that a machine might not be able to emulate even if for no other reason than mere physics.

Automation is happening everywhere, especially in the military. More than ever before are wars being fought by small armies of well-equiped, well-trained troops, rather than pouring in millions of poorly equiped, poorly trained troops like happened in the past.

A few thousand soldiers controlling drones, bombers and fighter jets can make short work of any resistance. And as drones become better and more automated, less soldiers will be used in the future.

A tiger tank in world war 2 had a 5-person crew. A modern T-14 Armata tank has a crew of 3, and is a way more diverse and capable weapon than the tiger tank. A world war 2 american heavy cruiser, Baltimore class, had a crew of 1140. A modern US ship of similar size, again with far greater capabilities, the Zumwalt Class, has a crew of 175.

Less people, more lethality. The will keep going on.

2. It is possible that massive social unrest will actually just result in collapse before it gets to that point. There is already growing radicalism in the west and we aren't even close to large scale automation yet. This is on top on all the other social problems such as growing racial tensions.

If the collapse comes earlier, than that's even worse. It will most likely result in automation going even faster.

3. It is more likely they will attempt passive methods of population removal rather than death camps, like "medicine" that sterilize a huge portion of the population.

Yeah that is exactly what will happen. There will be a huge divide between rich and poor people, and then the poor will slowly be removed.

 

[disillusioned]

Automation is happening everywhere, especially in the military. More than ever before are wars being fought by small armies of well-equiped, well-trained troops, rather than pouring in millions of poorly equiped, poorly trained troops like happened in the past.

There will never come a point in time where boots on the ground won't be needed. Ever. Even all the fancy toys can't actually hold and occupy territory on it's own. You will always need infantry. Infantry won't be automated for a host of reasons. One of the major problems is that making heavy robots use human like bipedal locomotion through complex terrain isn't feasible. The human body moves the way it does because it's designed in an extremely specific way that is unmatched by any other species of animal. Making a robot do that isn't a programming problem, it's a design problem. A problem that doesn't seem likely to be resolved, because the problem is physics rather than coding. This isn't the case with industrial robots, where locomotion and advanced human like movement isn't actually required for the robot to do it's job.

If the collapse comes earlier, than that's even worse. It will most likely result in automation going even faster.

Not sure how this related to my argument. If civilization collapses then the elites will lose their power.

Yeah that is exactly what will happen. There will be a huge divide between rich and poor people, and then the poor will slowly be removed.

Just lol if you think anybody will put up with this. One major flaw in this type of argument is that people think the elites are just invulnurable. That they are some immovable objects. They aren't. The only reason they have gotten away with so much bullshit is because quality of life in the west has remained high for a large period of time. This is changing. If people get pissed enough, then large hordes of people will start burning shit down. This will threaten the elites.

 

[Deleted member 4310]

AI is a meme to some extent

 

[Deleted member 275]

There will never come a point in time where boots on the ground won't be needed. Ever. Even all the fancy toys can't actually hold and occupy territory on it's own. You will always need infantry. Infantry won't be automated for a host of reasons. One of the major problems is that making heavy robots use human like bipedal locomotion through complex terrain isn't feasible. The human body moves the way it does because it's designed in an extremely specific way that is unmatched by any other species of animal. Making a robot do that isn't a programming problem, it's a design problem. A problem that doesn't seem likely to be resolved, because the problem is physics rather than coding. This isn't the case with industrial robots, where locomotion and advanced human like movement isn't actually required for the robot to do it's job.

You won't need much infantry when you have perfect air support, drones, and armored vehicles being controlled by 2 humans and being AI assisted. Killing humans more efficiently than ever, with less of these vehicles needed than ever before.

Not sure how this related to my argument. If civilization collapses then the elites will lose their power.

The elite won't care about civilization when they don't need civilization anymore due to automation. They will simply take the resources they need and disregard low value humans and their cities. Leaving only a small amount of entertainment purposes and necessary tasks.

The average 100IQ bus driver or post delivery guy? Useless.

Just lol if you think anybody will put up with this. One major flaw in this type of argument is that people think the elites are just invulnurable. That they are some immovable objects. They aren't. The only reason they have gotten away with so much bullshit is because quality of life in the west has remained high for a large period of time. This is changing. If people get pissed enough, then large hordes of people will start burning shit down. This will threaten the elites.

Again, the elite is getting relatively stronger than your average person every day. While the elite needed standing armies of thousands to protect their interests decades ago. Now they can do the same with a few hundred, better equiped, better trained people, assisted by the latest technology.

Bob, his buddies and their 9mm pistols, aren't going to be a threat in the future.

 

[disillusioned]

You won't need much infantry when you have perfect air support, drones, and armored vehicles being controlled by 2 humans and being AI assisted. Killing humans more efficiently than ever, with less of these vehicles needed than ever before.

For open war, yes. Not for policing. Drones cannot police the population all by themselves. Nor can tanks. You NEED actual people to do this. You cannot just drone everybody.

EDIT: Also, lasers and improved anti-air might actually make air power much less useful in the future.

 

[Deleted member 275]

For open war, yes. Not for policing. Drones cannot police the population all by themselves. Nor can tanks. You NEED actual people to do this. You cannot just drone everybody.

EDIT: Also, lasers and improved anti-air might actually make air power much less useful in the future.

The question is whether most of the population even needs policing. When they are of no use, there is no reason not to simply kill them.

Anyway, it will be brutal my man. But it will be beyond our times most likely. Which is why this topic is kinda cope. You are looking too far in the future, which is currently irrelevant, and disregarding the present life situation.

 

[TURBO]

 

[disillusioned]

The question is whether most of the population even needs policing. When they are of no use, there is no reason not to simply kill them.

Anyway, it will be brutal my man. But it will be beyond our times most likely. Which is why this topic is kinda cope. You are looking too far in the future, which is currently irrelevant, and disregarding the present life situation.

It's not this simple. You don't actually need the entire population to be replaced for a revolution to happen. Hitler got into power in Germany with sub-30% unemployment during the great depression. If automation makes even just 20-40% of the population unemployable then that will be enough to result in mass rioting. And the elites won't be able to just kill everybody because they will still need the other remaining 80-60% at that time. UBI is the future.