There is no Norwood 0

AlexAP

AlexAP

Kraken
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Posts
13,894
Reputation
28,971
Seriously, I heard so many times people in this forum using the term Norwood 0. It doesn't exist. The perfect hairline is Norwood 1. It's the first stage, there is no Norwood 0.

Pic1

Pic2

Pic3
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bitch
nw0 exists but 99% of people dont have it
its when you have a child-like hairline where the temples are lower than the middle of the hairline
Dellisola has it
1625857742858

this chang also has it
1625857784586
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Lmao, Jason Voorhees and 3 others
i made this edit of your image with nw0 included
1625857970489
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, AlwaysHaveQuestions and Deleted member 1332
nw0 exists but 99% of people dont have it
its when you have a child-like hairline where the temples are lower than the middle of the hairline
Dellisola has it
View attachment 1217063
this chang also has it
View attachment 1217064
It doesn't exist as medical term though.

Dr O’Tar Norwood introduced the Norwood scale in 1975, and it started with Norwood 1.
 
  • +1
Reactions: klip11 and AlwaysHaveQuestions
It doesn't exist as medical term though.

Dr O’Tar Norwood introduced the Norwood scale in 1975, and it started with Norwood 1.
yeah but clearly there are hairlines which are fuller than what he described as nw1
doesnt matter tho, at the end of puberty almost everyone gets nw1
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21340 and Deleted member 1332
cope
2528783
I
ZQ1VtSMYr76ivNvmx9MFJIqAVrKAh13wYiuMow4ANgI
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and Lmao
522402 v9 ba
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13787
nw0 exists but 99% of people dont have it
its when you have a child-like hairline where the temples are lower than the middle of the hairline
Dellisola has it
View attachment 1217063
this chang also has it
View attachment 1217064
have a hairline like this
although my hair was thinning 2 years ago, cause i kept abusing it with chemicals + no protein diet
its come back tho now
 
have a hairline like this
although my hair was thinning 2 years ago, cause i kept abusing it with chemicals + no protein diet
its come back tho now
yeah it means you probably wont go bald because the area in front of your temples is the most sensitive one, so even normal puberty causes hair loss there
its extremely rare for that part of the scalp to be resistant to dht
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
It's just a term people use for people with very low usually juvenile hairlines
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14266, Deleted member 21340, Effortless and 3 others
these people have small foreheads but nw1
nw0 is a female hairline
Nigga they have nw1
Seriously, I heard so many times people in this forum using the term Norwood 0. It doesn't exist. The perfect hairline is Norwood 1. It's the first stage, there is no Norwood 0.

View attachment 1217045
View attachment 1217046
View attachment 1217055

In short, this is a semantics problem, what you consider normwood 0 is not the same definition I use.
Basically I will say that men with foreheads like Khabib have normwood 0, which doesn't make a difference to use 1 or 0, because they are different anyway.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 756
Explain this norwood -2

1625859354604
1625859752242


My man has a permanent beany on (no pun intended because he's of that ethnic descent)
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6273 and ChristianChad
Explain this norwood -2

View attachment 1217103

My man has a permanent beany on (no pun intended because he's of that ethnic group)
Fun fact: Hairline height is determined by Prenatal T. In this case it's so low I wonder if there is some hormonal issue or some developmental issue or something
1625859756340
 
Last edited:
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Birdcell, Jason Voorhees, Deleted member 4106 and 2 others
In short, this is a semantics problem, what you consider normwood 0 is not the same definition I use.
Basically I will say that men with foreheads like Khabib have normwood 0, which doesn't make a difference to use 1 or 0, because they are different anyway.
youre right, but i think my definition makes more sense cause its a hairline that you see in women and childern which have no dht so 0 hairloss
while your examples have a clear nw1 hairline, its just really low and the forehead is small
 
youre right, but i think my definition makes more sense cause its a hairline that you see in women and childern which have no dht so 0 hairloss
while your examples have a clear nw1 hairline, its just really low and the forehead is small
Most non-balding people have a natural rounded hairline, but some people have a hairline where the temples are lower than the middle of the hairline, and it looks fuller.

However, in medical terms every non-balding stage is called Norwood 1. A person with a very low hairline is just Norwood 1 with a very low hairline.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ChristianChad, Deleted member 756 and Effortless
Image 2021 07 09 214152
XD!
 
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel, ChristianChad and Deleted member 13787

Similar threads

AstroSky
Replies
38
Views
423
AstroSky
AstroSky
wishIwasSalludon
Replies
46
Views
362
quantitativePSL
Q
theonewhorisesabove
Replies
9
Views
123
theonewhorisesabove
theonewhorisesabove
ConfusedBolivian
Replies
12
Views
209
oily703
oily703

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top