There is nothing immoral about necrophilia/necrophilic acts

[Deleted member 4612]

This is foolish behaviour. We both know it. I'm sure @john2 can agree.

you have no argument. in fact you know you have no argument so you're calling on someone to just agree with you since you know you have no argument so you're using someone's mere agreement as a substitute for an argument.

 

[Deleted member 5969]

you have no argument. in fact you know you have no argument so you're calling on someone to just agree with you since you know you have no argument so you're using someone's mere agreement as a substitute for an argument.

All these posts about rape and necrophilia etc
It's foolish.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

All these posts about rape and necrophilia etc
It's foolish.

why is it foolish? you haven't explained why

 

[Deleted member 5969]

why is it foolish? you haven't explained why

"There is nothing immoral about necrophilia/necrophilic acts"
Foolish.

https://looksmax.org/threads/at-wha...le-rape-be-less-risky-than-drunk-rape.271873/

Foolish.

Saying a 41 year old man wanting to throat fuck an 11 year old girl is wrong because it's "creepy" is a circular argument.

Let's think about this. How do you define "creepy"? SOCIAL NORMS Where do laws come from? SOCIAL NORMS Where does perceived socially acceptable morality come from? SOCIAL NORMS You're creepy = "you don't conform to social norms even if you obeyed the law, therefore you are immoral" It's...

looksmax.org

Foolish.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

"There is nothing immoral about necrophilia/necrophilic acts"
Foolish.

https://looksmax.org/threads/at-wha...le-rape-be-less-risky-than-drunk-rape.271873/

Foolish.

Saying a 41 year old man wanting to throat fuck an 11 year old girl is wrong because it's "creepy" is a circular argument.

Let's think about this. How do you define "creepy"? SOCIAL NORMS Where do laws come from? SOCIAL NORMS Where does perceived socially acceptable morality come from? SOCIAL NORMS You're creepy = "you don't conform to social norms even if you obeyed the law, therefore you are immoral" It's...

looksmax.org

Foolish.

the first one was a genuine question

the second was a repeated shitpost from back in august. the reason i reposted it was because @FastBananaCEO posted a thread where the original .co thread got onto tiktok.

 

[john2]

why is debating the lesser of two evils a sin?

You're indirectly going to be justifying necrophilia (or abortion). Both are unnatural acts. Abortion is the more worse thing, but so is necrophilia. Why would you even talk about this anyway lol?

why is it foolish? you haven't explained why

Anyone with a proper conscience will come to the conclusion that necrophilia and abortion are unnatural acts of immorality.

lesser of two evils discussions does not violate that

remember that the church agrees that there are different severity of sins

That's the catholic church. The true church knows that even the sin that you deem 'small/insignificant' can condemn you eternally.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

You're indirectly going to be justifying necrophilia (or abortion).

wait, i'm confused, why?

 

[john2]

wait, i'm confused, why?

If you say necrophilia is worse than abortion, then all the necrophiles lurking will tell themselves it's okay to do it and abortion is much worse. They can logically justify it by saying 'the person is dead, so who cares' when in fact it's an act of abomination and disgust.

 

[Deleted member 4612]

If you say necrophilia is worse than abortion, then all the necrophiles lurking will tell themselves it's okay to do it and abortion is much worse. They can logically justify it by saying 'the person is dead, so who cares' when in fact it's an act of abomination and disgust.

you mean "if you say abortion is worse than necrophilia"

the justification they use doesn't come from saying abortion is worse though.

 

[john2]

you mean "if you say abortion is worse than necrophilia"

the justification they use doesn't come from saying abortion is worse though.

It is very likely however. They'll just convince themselves about it. Either way necrophilia is logically nothing harmful since the person is dead and can't feel anything. But it doesn't change the fact that it's disgusting.

 

[Bigcel]

Their memory is being affected and their legacy is being tarnished, if you cannot comprehend this then I will end this discussion now.

It's simple really most people believe that they have a right to decide what happens to their corpses. Look at wills and the fact that we allow people to select their methods by which their corpses are disposed of. Some American Civil War enthusiasts ask that their bodies be cremated and shot out of antique cannons, and we have no problem indulging that wish.

Most people wouldn't want their corpses to be used sexually. Therefore necrophilia is considered wrong unless the deceased had specified otherwise prior to death that they didn't mind.

Even if you don't have the social intelligence to understand this try to look at it like this; once you die your body becomes a piece of property of your family. Just as you can't hump someone else's chair as it could be considered damaging private property you can't fuck someone's dead relative.

But it isn't about that in the end, it's about us considering ourselves owners of our bodies. By having sex with a corpse you're acting against that persons will, on top of that you will probably cause grief and suffering to the family whom the dead relative belongs. It's simple consent.

[automerge]1610176257[/automerge]

Their memory is being affected and their legacy is being tarnished, if you cannot comprehend this then I will end this discussion now.

It's simple really most people believe that they have a right to decide what happens to their corpses. Look at wills and the fact that we allow people to select their methods by which their corpses are disposed of. Some American Civil War enthusiasts ask that their bodies be cremated and shot out of antique cannons, and we have no problem indulging that wish.

Most people wouldn't want their corpses to be used sexually. Therefore necrophilia is considered wrong unless the deceased had specified otherwise prior to death that they didn't mind.

Even if you don't have the social intelligence to understand this try to look at it like this; once you die your body becomes a piece of property of your family. Just as you can't hump someone else's chair as it could be considered damaging private property you can't fuck someone's dead relative.

But it isn't about that in the end, it's about us considering ourselves owners of our bodies. By having sex with a corpse you're acting against that persons will, on top of that you will probably cause grief and suffering to the family whom the dead relative belongs. It's simple consent.

High iq