there is way more about beauty that we don't know about

[mortis]

i have been reading a ton about facial features and lookism in general over the years, but i have never been able to answer one question. what really makes each face unique on its own way? 7.5 billion people on this planet earth and even people on their own phenotypes look unique and different like fingerprints.
anderias eriksen is a chad, so as jon kortajarena, so as jeremy meeks, chico etc... they look like a different world when you compare their faces.sure different rarios, different eye areas, different skin tones but all features are considered ideal and must have to be attractive yet they are soo different and distinct from each other. you can put all sort of costum implants, do bimax, do what ever jaw surgery on a dude, lift what ever on his face, all sort of surgery on his eyes and he would still look bad and unattractive even if he had ratios and base.
i think there is more things about looks and beauty that we dont know. ratios, bone structure, skin, harmony are all essentials of good looks, but if these were the only essentials, then all gl people would look the same. just like ideal manmade robots. but actually gl people look different. very very different and unique on tbeir own way
also by unique i don't mean people are not ugly and normie speech. 90% of the people are ugly subhumans.9 %acceptable and 1% gl ideal genetics
hope you get what i meant

 

[Deleted member 9380]

why speak into nonexistent when we already have the knowledge about the base of beauty ? also what's your vision on that beauty that may be hidden beyond the unknown ?

 

[Effortless]

I get what you mean but at the same time good looking people all tend to have similar features

To consider also there's good looking by race, pheno, colouring but yeah interesting thought tbh

 

[MedMaxxing]

What you could have just said is that depending on the base, different ratios make more sense and fit better. A person with a shorter midface (not short face syndrome but really compact) looks a lot better with a slightly wider FWHR and taller lower third (so basically decently Robust Zygos+robust lower jaw) whereas someone who has a slightly longer face suits diamond (Zygos overpowering lower third width) type shape.

 

[mortis]

why speak into nonexistent when we already have the knowledge about the base of beauty ? also what's your vision on that beauty that may be hidden beyond the unknown ?
View attachment 846728

2 people may have the base of beauty byt look different. thats my vision. why it happens when 2 people have ideal features yet they look different? actually i explained above tbh
what makes chicos face forrexample better than a normal chad that has all the kdeal features?both got ideal features but one is more attractive than the other and questiones like these .

 

[mortis]

What you could have just said is that depending on the base, different ratios make more sense and fit better. A person with a shorter midface (not short face syndrome but really compact) looks a lot better with a slightly wider FWHR and taller lower third (so basically decently Robust Zygos+robust lower jaw) whereas someone who has a slightly longer face suits diamond (Zygos overpowering lower third width) type shape.

exacly. but people with these same features may look different. thats the point of it

 

[mortis]

I get what you mean but at the same time good looking people all tend to have similar features

To consider also there's good looking by race, pheno, colouring but yeah interesting thought tbh

agreed all have the base of essentials. but some small things make their face overly different and recognizeable from each other.one better thatn the other etc..

 

[Deleted member 9380]

2 people may have the base of beauty byt look different. thats my vision. why it happens when 2 people have ideal features yet they look different? actually i explained above tbh
what makes chicos face forrexample better than a normal chad that has all the kdeal features?both got ideal features but one is more attractive than the other and questiones like these .

so what you are saying is that different people can differentiate their ideal beauty standards and that can imply the phrase "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" because they may be looking at 2 perfect human beings but still tilt to one side because it might have had 1 or more specific beauty feature that reminded them of themselves or feels more at home than the other ?

 

[rockndogs]

It's karma bro. God looks at your files and say "that faggot is a fucking cunt. He will be ugly af and ethnic jfl"

 

[Enfant terrible]

so what you are saying is that different people can differentiate their ideal beauty standards and that can imply the phrase "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" because they may be looking at 2 perfect human beings but still tilt to one side because it might have had 1 or more specific beauty feature that reminded them of themselves or feels more at home than the other ?
View attachment 846772

He just wants to know why they stil look different
But have the same features

 

[Enfant terrible]

agreed all have the base of essentials. but some small things make their face overly different and recognizeable from each other.one better thatn the other etc..

YEAH ITS because they dont have all the same features
THE MYSTERY IS SOLVED

 

[MedMaxxing]

exacly. but people with these same features may look different. thats the point of it

Yeah, that's why people here need to understand that before basing conclusions of what they "need". For instance, I have extremely similar mid facial compactness to a dude like Cavill, but I am downward grown and he's more robust in both Zygos and lower third. I plan on getting MSE for palate and breathing with slight width gain in Zygos and then I am getting Bimax with CCW rotation to fix my downward growth (potentially with widening on the lower third for more robustness). If you find someone with similar facial ratios, that's who you should base your ascension on. Ratios largely cannot be changed, the support structure can.

 

[mortis]

so what you are saying is that different people can differentiate their ideal beauty standards and that can imply the phrase "beauty is in the eye of the beholder" because they may be looking at 2 perfect human beings but still tilt to one side because it might have had 1 or more specific beauty feature that reminded them of themselves or feels more at home than the other ?
View attachment 846772

no, each face has its unique looks that we can distinguisn and spot nothing is in out eyes and has something beyond basic fearues that makes it better or worse than the others. like we all can agree these guys have the base of attractive face. some even have better bone defenition than the other( normal model mogs chico in this department) but still some mog the other. we all agree here that chico here mogs these 3 models into oblivion but he may have weaker bone structure. all these models have good eye area, good ratios and etc..

or you have someone like this. utter trash plastic fuck that has supposedly ideal bone structure and features but still looks sub 1 psl scary fuck abomination alien faggot

but you have jordan barret, he looks good with these alien like features and moggs hard. he is natural and thats why he mogs. but that dude tried hard to replicate his looks but failed despite some simillar features.

 

[mortis]

YEAH ITS because they dont have all the same features
THE MYSTERY IS SOLVED

agreed. no one has 100% same features but my point is not this exactly. some has 90 % the same features but their face look 100% different. this is the point

 

[mortis]

Yeah, that's why people here need to understand that before basing conclusions of what they "need". For instance, I have extremely similar mid facial compactness to a dude like Cavill, but I am downward grown and he's more robust in both Zygos and lower third. I plan on getting MSE for palate and breathing with slight width gain in Zygos and then I am getting Bimax with CCW rotation to fix my downward growth (potentially with widening on the lower third for more robustness). If you find someone with similar facial ratios, that's who you should base your ascension on. Ratios largely cannot be changed, the support structure can.

would you think you look just the same as cavill after ascending?

 

[MedMaxxing]

would you think you look just the same as cavill after ascending?

Nah. Different phenotype.

 

[Deleted member 10524]

no, each face has its unique looks that we can distinguisn and spot nothing is in out eyes and has something beyond basic fearues that makes it better or worse than the others. like we all can agree these guys have the base of attractive face. some even have better bone defenition than the other( normal model mogs chico in this department) but still some mog the other. we all agree here that chico here mogs these 3 models into oblivion but he may have weaker bone structure. all these models have good eye area, good ratios and etc..

View attachment 847508View attachment 847509View attachment 847510View attachment 847511
or you have someone like this. utter trash plastic fuck that has supposedly ideal bone structure and features but still looks sub 1 psl scary fuck abomination alien faggot
View attachment 847513View attachment 847514
but you have jordan barret, he looks good with these alien like features and moggs hard. he is natural and thats why he mogs. but that dude tried hard to replicate his looks but failed despite some simillar features.

subhuman tier collagen, nose, lips, chin and cheekbones, and gay ass eyes, mogger hairline tho. It would take an insane level of BDD to screw yourself so much

 

[mortis]

subhuman tier collagen, nose, lips, chin and cheekbones, and gay ass eyes, mogger hairline tho. It would take an insane level of BDD to screw yourself so much

yeah i meant he tried to adapt and surgery maxed but still failed as 1 psl unattractive guy.he got so many failos of course.

 

[Deleted member 6403]

the maxilla is everything

 

[mortis]

the maxilla is everything

maxilla is the base of an attractve face of course agreed 100%