There really does seem to be a correlation between ramus and browridge size

AutisticBeaner

AutisticBeaner

Nosebreather
Joined
Oct 13, 2019
Posts
8,918
Reputation
12,392
Despite that @Alibaba69's thread yesterday didn't seem too sensible to me, the study about browridge size correlating with ramus size and thus also being affected by chewing got me thinking. So I started comparing people's browridge with their ramus irl like the autistic beaner that I am and came to the conclusion that although this correlation is not a direct one, it does seem to exist.

The study (credit to @Alibaba69): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02447216
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2227
I got a strong browridge, but my ramus is fucked tbh.
 
  • +1
Reactions: balding17yomanletcel
Funnily enough, I have moderately strong browridge (like bonesmashed Astro) and long Ramus

I avoided chewing hard things or chewing too long because it exhausted my massetters so easily (subhuman trait)

But this shouldnt break the rule, I see the correlation but Ramus = Temples is better
 
Did you mouthbreather bro?
Never mouth breathed ever.

Since I was a kid I always hated people who mouthbreated for some reason, they made me rage
 
Never mouth breathed ever.

Since I was a kid I always hated people who mouthbreated for some reason, they made me rage
Fr they look stupid asf always wanted to punch them in the nose and tell them to start breathing like a normal motherfucker.

Even before PSL i hated the look of it
 
  • +1
Reactions: IWantToMax
Fr they look stupid asf always wanted to punch them in the nose and tell them to start breathing like a normal motherfucker.

Even before PSL i hated the look of it
Exactly what I used to think.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aesthetic
I have good browridge and ramus is long as well
Just saying didn't read anything
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2227 and maxmendietta
Both are linked to cranial base. Masticatory muscles don't affect brow ridge development. Case closed
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 2227 and AutisticBeaner
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AutisticBeaner
Later studies suggest that mastication doesn't have too big of an effect on supraorbital bridge, and this is what the stress distribution looks like on various different skulls (incisor bite):

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Justin_Ledogar/publication/324209022/figure/fig2/AS:611991815221248@1522921627360/Results-of-finite-element-analysis-under-an-anterior-bite-simulation-loading-via-muscle.png
https://www.une.edu.au/__data/assets/image/0003/214446/finite-element-models-anterior-bite-14c1el0-e1522888766235.jpg



Well at least the pressure seems to be above absolute zero...

But surprisingly the skulls with the flatest supraorbital bridges are under the most pressure there, and the skulls with the most portriding bridgest the least.

So it looks like the less portruding the suprorbital bridge, the greater the pressure= greater gains.

So from the looks of it it's a win win situation- the less effective chewing is for your supraorbital bridge, the bigger it already is anyway (wether it be because of cranial base, prenetal/pubertal hormones, etc.)



Anecdote: My broridge has become visibly more portruding after al the months of mastic chewing.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutisticBeaner
^ masticates me
 
Later studies suggest that mastication doesn't have too big of an effect on supraorbital bridge, and this is what the stress distribution looks like on various different skulls (incisor bite):

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Justin_Ledogar/publication/324209022/figure/fig2/AS:611991815221248@1522921627360/Results-of-finite-element-analysis-under-an-anterior-bite-simulation-loading-via-muscle.png
https://www.une.edu.au/__data/assets/image/0003/214446/finite-element-models-anterior-bite-14c1el0-e1522888766235.jpg



Well at least the pressure seems to be above absolute zero...

But surprisingly the skulls with the flatest supraorbital bridges are under the most pressure there, and the skulls with the most portriding bridgest the least.

So it looks like the less portruding the suprorbital bridge, the greater the pressure= greater gains.

So from the looks of it it's a win win situation- the less effective chewing is for your supraorbital bridge, the bigger it already is anyway (wether it be because of cranial base, prenetal/pubertal hormones, etc.)



Anecdote: My broridge has become visibly more portruding after al the months of mastic chewing.
by the way, are we now supposed to chew gum till the end of our lives? i'm assuming the ramus wont get smaller if you stop but the masseter muscle should, right?
 
by the way, are we now supposed to chew gum till the end of our lives? i'm assuming the ramus wont get smaller if you stop but the masseter muscle should, right?
Everyone loses bonemass as they get older.

It's the same with muscles.

I haven't read any study on this, but I'm pretty sure that bones will take a long fucking time to atrophy.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutisticBeaner
E
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutisticBeaner

Similar threads

Algernon
Replies
5
Views
289
notlarpingscott
notlarpingscott
HubertSkeletrix
Replies
10
Views
169
an didy foid😱😱😱
an didy foid😱😱😱
MangoLover
Replies
26
Views
465
ChudReceptor
ChudReceptor

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top