There Will be No Escape from the Antichrist and NWO

[chaddyboi66]

You niggas know it's coming whether you're religious or not from what they've been able to force normies to do the past year and a half, they [the elite] are not religious and yet they still cause these things to happen because it serves their great agenda- that being making you into a slave.






muslimcels too:







legit only hope is to shtfmaxx and live off in the wilderness tbh tbh ngl ngl

 

[Marsiere214]

Arent u Muslim?

 

[chaddyboi66]

Arent u Muslim?

No, I'm an Orthodox Christian.



[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

 

[TDriver]

Bump

 

[BigBiceps]

BBCs should turn the other cheek. Other cheek of joo chicks

 

[hebbewem]

Yeah they are atheist because they have most info about the world

 

[chaddyboi66]

Yeah they are atheist because they have most info about the world

The lower ranks are full of atheists and nihilists that don't take any of the occult stuff seriously, they're just in it to elitemaxx and rule over the goyim, but the higher ups are definitely occultists and in league with entities[/demons] some think it's satanism others some kind of syncretic mix of various zodiac based religions/the evil version astrotheology.

There's no way to say for sure what exactly they believe only that it compels them to not value human life at all and do evil things to us because they believe themselves to be more than human.


[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

 

[hebbewem]

The lower ranks are full of atheists and nihilists that don't take any of the occult stuff seriously, they're just in it to elitemaxx and rule over the goyim, but the higher ups are definitely occultists and in league with entities[/demons] some think it's satanism others some kind of syncretic mix of various zodiac based religions/the evil version astrotheology.

There's no way to say for sure what exactly they believe only that it compels them to not value human life at all and do evil things to us because they believe themselves to be more than human.


[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

Nobody are in league with demons or satan because if they know they existed they would be die hard religious and the usa and the rest of the world would be theocracy

 

[chaddyboi66]

Nobody are in league with demons or satan because if they know they existed they would be die hard religious and the usa and the rest of the world would be theocracy

They're religious but in the other sense, they worship the devil because they genuinely believe him to be the 'true' deity and that he'll be able to overcome the true God, same as the people who built the Tower of Babel planning to literally invade heaven, but just as with the Tower they too will be smited by the sword of Christ in the end.




[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

 

[hebbewem]

They're religious but in the other sense, they worship the devil because they genuinely believe him to be the 'true' deity and that he'll be able to overcome the true God, same as the people who built the Tower of Babel planning to literally invade heaven, but just as with the Tower they too will be smited by the sword of Christ in the end.




[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

Kinda childish i rather belive they are just normal humans that arent religous and they use religon and progessive to get power

 

[WontStopNorwooding]

No escape from norwood 0 ?

Hell yea

 

[ropemax]

some think it's satanism others some kind of syncretic mix of various zodiac based religions/the evil version astrotheology.

There's no way to say for sure what exactly they believe only that it compels them to not value human life at all and do evil things to us because they believe themselves to be more than human.

 

[ropemax]

they worship the devil because they genuinely believe him to be the 'true' deity and that he'll be able to overcome the true God, same as the people who built the Tower of Babel planning to literally invade heaven, but just as with the Tower they too will be smited by the sword of Christ in the end.

I'm an Orthodox Christian.

 

[chaddyboi66]

I hate the antichrist.




[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

 

[chaddyboi66]

I hate the antichrist.

Fuck off satanist.



[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

 

[hebbewem]

Fuck off satanist.



[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

It exist no satanist because its retarded viewpoint

 

[ropemax]

I hate the antichrist.




[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

There is no such figure in the Bible. Your exegesis game is terrible. If you like the concept, head over to Islam, they have Dajjal.

 

[ropemax]

Fuck off satanist.



[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

1. I'm not a satanist
2. You don't understand who satan are in your lore

 

[chaddyboi66]

There is no such figure in the Bible. Your exegesis game is terrible. If you like the concept, head over to Islam, they have Dajjal.

I'm not protestant so the same arguements you degenerates use on the but muh bible alone niggas won't work here.
Also, from a basic wiki search that took less than 12 seconds:

Antichrist - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In Christian eschatology, the Antichrist or anti-Christ refers to people prophesied by the Bible to oppose Jesus Christ and substitute themselves in Christ's place before the Second Coming.[1] The term Antichrist (including one plural form)[2] is found five times in the New Testament, solely in the First and Second Epistle of John.[2] The Antichrist is announced as the one "who denies the Father and the Son."[2]

The similar term pseudokhristos or "false Christ" is also found in the Gospels.[3] In Matthew (chapter 24) and Mark (chapter 13), Jesus alerts his disciples not to be deceived by the false prophets, who will claim themselves as being Christ, performing "great signs and wonders".[4][5][6] Three other images often associated with the singular Antichrist are the "little horn" in Daniel's final vision, the "man of sin" in Paul the Apostle's Second Epistle to the Thessalonians, and the Beast of the Sea in the Book of Revelation.[7][8][9]

 

[TDriver]

You vill eat ze bugs goyim no questchiun

 

[Elvisandreaa]

We're in the endgame fratello

 

[ropemax]

I'm not protestant so the same arguements you degenerates use on the but muh bible alone niggas won't work here.
Also, from a basic wiki search that took less than 12 seconds:

Antichrist - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

If you've made just a little effort to actually read what's on that wikipedia page or even go a little further (imagine that), instead of trying to appear educated, you'd know that:

1. The word antichrist appears only few times in the Epistles of John (not anywhere else) and it's used to denote anyone who's rejecting Jesus as messiah (mostly a middle finger to Gnostics)

2. 2 Thessalonians is a suspected forgery and man of lawlessness that Paul allegedly was writing about isn't a specific person.

3. The beast from Revelation was Emperor Nero. Learn some gematria and what the apocalyptic genre is about, son.

 

[IncelsBraincels]

There is no escape from losing nw0

 

[Deleted member 16834]

Imagine waiting 40 years for this shit JFL

I’d rather be chad and live a hedonic life and repent when that shit happens

 

[chaddyboi66]

If you've made just a little effort to actually read what's on that wikipedia page or even go a little further (imagine that), instead of trying to appear educated, you'd know that:

I wasn't trying to appear educated, only to show how there does exist such a figure in the bible whether he's called antichrist or not.

Like in the second paragraph I quoted:

The similar term pseudokhristos or "false Christ" is also found in the Gospels.[3] In Matthew (chapter 24) and Mark (chapter 13), Jesus alerts his disciples not to be deceived by the false prophets, who will claim themselves as being Christ, performing "great signs and wonders".[4][5][6] Three other images often associated with the singular Antichrist are the "little horn" in Daniel's final vision, the "man of sin" in Paul the Apostle's Second Epistle to the Thessalonians, and the Beast of the Sea in the Book of Revelation.[7][8][9]

That's why I left the link btw.

Antichrist - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

1. The word antichrist appears only few times in the Epistles of John (not anywhere else) and it's used to denote anyone who's rejecting Jesus as messiah (mostly a middle finger to Gnostics)

Yes the term in the Epistles of John were referring to those who rejected Christ, but there are multiple types of 'antichrists' as the word "anti" in Greek literally means "instead" so 'anti'christ- 'instead' of Christ- false Christ.

Antichrist is translated from the combination of two ancient Greek words ἀντί + Χριστός (anti + Christos). In Greek, Χριστός means "anointed one" and the word Christ derives from it.[10] "Ἀντί" means not only anti in the sense of "against" and "opposite of", but also "in place of".[11][12]

And I say that because like I already mentioned...

I'm not protestant so the same arguements you degenerates use on the but muh bible alone niggas won't work here.

We Orthodox don't only use the bible alone for what we believe like Protestants:
St. John of Damascus, Concerning the antichrist

Philip Schaff: NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus - Christian Classics Ethereal Library

www.ccel.org

It should be known that the Antichrist is bound to come. Every one, therefore, who confesses not that the Son of God came in the flesh and is perfect God and became perfect man, after being God, is Antichrist. But in a peculiar and special sense he who comes at the consummation of the age is called Antichrist. First, then, it is requisite that the Gospel should be preached among all nations, as the Lord said, and then he will come to refute the impious Jews. For the Lord said to them: I am come in My Father’s name and ye receive Me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. And the apostle says, Because they received not the love of the truth that they might be saved, for this cause God shall send them a strong delusion that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness. The Jews accordingly did not receive the Lord Jesus Christ who was the Son of God and God, but receive the impostor who calls himself God. For that he will assume the name of God, the angel teaches Daniel, saying these words, Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers. And the apostle says: Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition: who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God; in the temple of God he said; not our temple, but the old Jewish temple. For he will come not to us but to the Jews: not for Christ or the things of Christ: wherefore he is called Antichrist.First, therefore, it is necessary that the Gospel should be preached among all nations: And then shall that wicked one be revealed, even him whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish, whom the Lord shall consume with the word of His mouth and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming. The devil himself, therefore does not become man in the way that the Lord was made man. God forbid! but he becomes man as the offspring of fornication and receiveth all the energy of Satan. For God, foreknowing the strangeness of the choice that he would make, allows the devil to take up his abode in him.He is, therefore, as we said, the offspring of fornication and is nurtured in secret, and on a sudden he rises up and rebels and assumes rule. And in the beginning of his rule, or rather tyranny, he assumes the role of sanctity. But when he becomes master he persecutes the Church of God and displays all his wickedness. But he will come with signs and lying wonders, fictitious and not real, and he will deceive and lead away from the living God those whose mind rests on an unsound and unstable foundation, so that even the elect shall, if it be possible, be made to stumble.But Enoch and Elias the Thesbite shall be sent and shall turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, that is, the synagogue to our Lord Jesus Christ and the preaching of the apostles: and they will be destroyed by him. And the Lord shall come out of heaven, just as the holy apostles beheld Him going into heaven, perfect God and perfect man, with glory and power, and will destroy the man of lawlessness, the son of destruction, with the breath of His mouth. Let no one, therefore, look for the Lord to come from earth, but out of Heaven, as He himself has made sure.

2. 2 Thessalonians is a suspected forgery

Only a handful of people suspect it's a forgery, almost all of them being protestant and it's not a a position supported by the Orthodox Church.

and man of lawnessess that Paul allegedly was writing about isn't a specific person.

That also not an Orthodox view, and even then most of your coveted "mainstream scholars" also not only believe this to be a single figure but the antichrist as well:

Man of sin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. 5 Don’t you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things? 6 And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. 7 For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. 9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.[2]

Nearly all commentators, both ancient and modern, identify the man of sin in 2 Thessalonians chapter 2 as the Antichrist, even though they vary greatly in who they view the Antichrist to be.[3] The man of sin is variously identified with Caligula,[4] Nero,[5][6] the papacy[7] and the end times Antichrist. Some scholars believe that the passage contains no genuine prediction, but represents a speculation of the apostle's own, based on Dan 8:23ff; 11:36ff, and on contemporary ideas of Antichrist.[4][8]

3. The beast from Revelation was Emperor Nero. Learn some gematria and what the apocalyptic genre is about, son.

3. gematria translates to Nero,

.

The term onoma used in Revelation can also mean 'title' in the same context not just the name of a single person.

How the fuck is this some great gotcha moment, you degenerate cuck.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

No, I'm an Orthodox Christian.



[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

Same

 

[ropemax]

I wasn't trying to appear educated, only to show how there does exist such a figure in the bible whether he's called antichrist or not.

"I linked a wikipedia article entitled Antichrist which took me less than 12 seconds to find (sic) to show you that the Antichrist figure exists in the Bible but he's not called Antichrist"

sure.

Like in the second paragraph I quoted

None of these figures (of which only 2 are real people) are congruent with your previous doomsday ramblings.

Yes the term in the Epistles of John were referring to those who rejected Christ, but there are multiple types of 'antichrists' as the word "anti" in Greek literally means "instead" so 'anti'christ- 'instead' of Christ- false Christ.

Good, you're learning.

We Orthodox don't only use the bible alone for what we believe like Protestants

If you value his words over what's in the Bible, ok.

Only a handful of people suspect it's a forgery, almost all of them being protestant and it's not a a position supported by the Orthodox Church

Quite the opposite. It's widely accepted as a pseudonymous letter among scholars. You can cope with your Church but tradition =/= truth.

That also not an Orthodox view, and even then most of your coveted "mainstream scholars" also not only believe this to be a single figure but the antichrist as well:

And who are those scholars exactly? It's an outdated view, doesn't hold much value in the academia anymore.

3. gematria translates to Nero,

.

The term onoma used in Revelation can also mean 'title' in the same context not just the name of a single person.

How the fuck is this some great gotcha moment, you degenerate cuck.

Could you elab on that? I'm really not sure how to respond to random wikipedia extracts without context.

 

[TITUS]

The lower ranks are full of atheists and nihilists that don't take any of the occult stuff seriously, they're just in it to elitemaxx and rule over the goyim, but the higher ups are definitely occultists and in league with entities[/demons] some think it's satanism others some kind of syncretic mix of various zodiac based religions/the evil version astrotheology.

There's no way to say for sure what exactly they believe only that it compels them to not value human life at all and do evil things to us because they believe themselves to be more than human.


[ISPOILER] [/ISPOILER]

Is not that just plain judaism?

 

[TITUS]

Imagine waiting 40 years for this shit JFL

I’d rather be chad and live a hedonic life and repent when that shit happens

Last minute repent saved many souls, the best of both worlds.

 

[chaddyboi66]

"I linked a wikipedia article entitled Antichrist which took me less than 12 seconds to find (sic) to show you that the Antichrist figure exists in the Bible but he's not called Antichrist"

sure.

yes.

None of these figures (of which only 2 are real people) are congruent with your previous doomsday ramblings.

3 Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. 4 He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. 5 Don’t you remember that when I was with you I used to tell you these things? 6 And now you know what is holding him back, so that he may be revealed at the proper time. 7 For the secret power of lawlessness is already at work; but the one who now holds it back will continue to do so till he is taken out of the way. 8 And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will overthrow with the breath of his mouth and destroy by the splendor of his coming. 9 The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with how Satan works. He will use all sorts of displays of power through signs and wonders that serve the lie, 10 and all the ways that wickedness deceives those who are perishing. They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.[2]

How is this not in anyway not aligned with I've been saying? A single man opposing and exalting himself over everything and declaring himself god.

(of which only 2 are real people)

Someone like you saying these people aren't real is akin to someone like me saying something akin to "dinosaurs don't exist" or "global warming climate change isn't real".

Rather that's to say- who are you to say something like that when you don't even believe in any of this to begin with?

Good, you're learning.

I don't need to learn anything from a degenerate.

If you value his words over what's in the Bible, ok.

We value both his words and the Bible, as his words only serve to support what's already in it, not that it matters to a satanist anyway though.

Quite the opposite. It's widely accepted as a pseudonymous letter among scholars.

No, it isn't. I don't care about what those scholars purport because they're not Orthodox and it's not the position of the Church.

You can cope with your Church but tradition =/= truth.

In this instance, you're the one coping [[ISPOILER]or you would be if you were actually Protestant since you're using their arguments and presume I would even accept them[/ISPOILER]] as tradition is what has kept the true [Orthodox] Church from going down the same degenerate path the now decadent Latin Church and the multitude of different divided [Protestant] "denominations" [churches] in the west have gone down- further away from God.

But then again, who the fuck are you to tell me what the truth of Christianity is when you reject it yourself?

The Orthodox tradition is the truth.

And who are those scholars exactly? It's an outdated view, doesn't hold much value in the academia anymore.

Most Protestants scholars like Lyle W. Lange do. We're also not talking about academia, just theology.

Could you elab on that? I'm really not sure how to respond to random wikipedia extracts without context.

No.



[ISPOILER]The parts where I quoted from Wiki or other sources were in context to what I was immediately saying so they make sense, this part wasn't quoting from wikipedia:[/ISPOILER]

3. The beast from Revelation was Emperor Nero. Learn some gematria and what the apocalyptic genre is about, son.

gematria translates to Nero,

.

The term onoma used in Revelation can also mean 'title' in the same context not just the name of a single person.

How the fuck is this some great gotcha moment, you degenerate cuck.

[ISPOILER]Gematria of "the number of the beast" translates to Nero, or in other words- water [is wet].

How the fuck is this some great gotcha moment, you degenerate cuck.

The term used for "name" in Revelation, 'onoma' in Greek, can also mean 'title' in the same context and not necessarily just the name of a single person:[/ISPOILER]
[ISPOILER]Revelation 13:17[/ISPOILER]

17 and he provides that no one will be able to buy or to sell, except the one who has the mark, either the name of the beast or the number of his name

[ISPOILER]Revelation 19:16[/ISPOILER]

16 And on His robe and on His thigh He has a name written, "KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS."

 

[ropemax]

How is this not in anyway not aligned with I've been saying? A single man opposing and exalting himself over everything and declaring himself god

Because:

a) You were specifically preaching about "the antichrist" who is an extrabiblical tale (I can easily infer that from the videos you posted, the one about Dajjal especially)

b) As i already said, Man of Lawlessness (not that this is canon anyway but whatever) wasn't intended to be interpreted as a real person but rather a personification of lawlessness (read Malherbe's stance on it for details).

Someone like you saying these people aren't real is akin to someone like me saying something akin to "dinosaurs don't exist" or "global warming climate change isn't real".

Rather that's to say- who are you to say something like that when you don't even believe in any of this to begin with?

What does it matter what i believe? We're discussing exegesis - Daniel's little horn was a real person (Antiochus IV), The Beast was a real person (Nero).

I don't need to learn anything from a degenerate

Very mature of you. Your ego is through the roof.

We value both his words and the Bible, as his words only serve to support what's already in it, not that it matters to a satanist anyway though.

Sorry, they don't, it's just extrabiblical nonsense (which is fine if you agree that it is. Laughable if you don't). I'm not a satanist, you don't know what satan means.

No, it isn't. I don't care about what those scholars purport because they're not Orthodox and it's not the position of the Church.

Jfl. Just dismiss all evidence and scholars because it doesn't match your Church's doctrine. Way to get stuck up in archaic and incorrect viewpoints. This shit is being taught in Intro to New Testament lectures.

In this instance, you're the one coping [or you would be if you were actually Protestant since you're using their arguments and presume I would even accept them] as tradition is what has kept the true [Orthodox] Church from going down the same degenerate path the now decadent Latin Church and the multitude of different divided [Protestant] "denominations" [churches] in the west have gone down- further away from God

Not interested in elitist ramblings with no merithorical value to them.

But then again, who the fuck are you to tell me what the truth of Christianity is when you reject it yourself

Once again, we're talking theology. I don't need to be a Christian to school you on theology. Bart Ehrman isn't a Christian, look how well he's doing.

The Orthodox tradition is the truth.

Most Protestants scholars like Lyle W. Lange do. We're also not talking about academia, just theology.

I can tell you with all honesty, he's in the vast minority. Almost all leading scholars are more closely alligned with Malherbe. You're going against the grain because you're stuck up in your tradition, you can't help but mix your beliefs with objectivity resulting in a selective bias.

The term used for "name" in Revelation, 'onoma' in Greek, can also mean 'title' in the same context and not necessarily just the name of a single person:
Revelation 13:17

This isn't even the argument. Are you familiar with Gematria and the numerical principles upon which Hebrew operates?
Number of his name - 666; NERON KAISAR transliterated from greek obtains this exact value, as well as "beast" (θηρίον). This is further supported by a latin variation of the anagram (NERO KAISAR) of which value is 616 - congruent with the P115 manuscript where this value appears instead of 666. This further ties into Rev 17:11 and the Nero Redivivus trope.

The beast who once was, and now is not, is an eighth king. He belongs to the seven and is going to his destruction.

Please don't get too ridiculous and just thrash the unanimous scholarly consensus that this is about a roman emperor (gonna leave the gate open for Domitian) & not a doomsday prophecy but rather a political commentary disguised with allegories to fill the persecuted Christian readers of Rome with hope.