There’s genuinely no more arguments for classical theism anymore

ICXCLuvr

ICXCLuvr

s0 mAny d3Ad m3n iN mY p0cK3t😈🗿
Joined
Oct 14, 2023
Posts
18,217
Reputation
25,555
They all ran out and each one has 3 counter argument

Christians need to go back to saying “god can’t be disproven or proven” as a cop out lmao
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: iblamechico, erome, armemann and 4 others
TRVKE

RELIGIONCELS ARE BRAINDEAD RETARDED COPERS
 
  • +1
Reactions: armemann, JewishNationalist, ICXCLuvr and 2 others
  • +1
Reactions: armemann, JewishNationalist, ICXCLuvr and 2 others
religioncels when you ask them why peter scully was allowed to exist
1787546561416
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: erome, armemann, ICXCLuvr and 2 others
Why do you care so much about what other people believe in
 
  • +1
Reactions: H72, ICXCLuvr and mltnisme124
Why do you care so much about what other people believe in
pointing out the idiocracy of others beliefs is not the same as genuinely caring.

people can believe whatever they want to believe, even a giant ageplaying pedo who wears diapers and shit the world out for all i care
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: JewishNationalist, ICXCLuvr and NoidFiggerJew67
wow first time agreeing with this guy
 
  • +1
Reactions: mltnisme124
Why do you care so much about what other people believe in
It has effects on the world but ultimately it’s fun to debate them.

I’ve done it for a while now and I think I have a solid argument for his non existence
 
They all ran out and each one has 3 counter argument

Christians need to go back to saying “god can’t be disproven or proven” as a cop out lmao
they are right that god can't be proven or disproven, thats why i prefer to not believe in that shit. just some made up shit definitely, no reason to seriously believe in that.
 
they are right that god can't be proven or disproven, thats why i prefer to not believe in that shit. just some made up shit definitely, no reason to seriously believe in that.
Classical god can be disproven.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
ok then, disprove him
Premise 1: Human experience reduces entirely to joy or suffering, making the maximization of bliss and minimization of pain the ultimate driver of all action.


Premise 2: "Virtue" “free will” and "character" are not intrinsic ends, but merely instrumental tools used to reduce suffering in a flawed environment.


Premise 3: An all good God’s objective must be the complete maximization of joy and total elimination of suffering for conscious beings.


Premise 4: An all powerful God can directly grant total bliss without relying on intermediate tools, tradeoffs, or testing mechanisms.


Premise 5: Any degree of discomfort or suffering no matter how small proves reality is not maximized for bliss.


Conclusion: Therefore, an all powerful, all good God does not exist, as any permitted pain is an unforced design flaw.

@xye
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: erome and JewishNationalist
They all ran out and each one has 3 counter argument

Christians need to go back to saying “god can’t be disproven or proven” as a cop out lmao
Religion is dumb and discredits others’ struggles
It’s arrogant to believe you know the reason behind the universe
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
Religion is dumb and discredits others’ struggles
It’s arrogant to believe you know the reason behind the universe
Le ✨first cause✨
 
  • +1
Reactions: no1softee
Let people believe in what there want
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
I wanna debate them
Boasting your religious status doesnt make you any more holy in gods eyes all you can do is preach to people who don’t care
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
Premise 1: Human experience reduces entirely to joy or suffering, making the maximization of bliss and minimization of pain the ultimate driver of all action.


Premise 2: "Virtue" “free will” and "character" are not intrinsic ends, but merely instrumental tools used to reduce suffering in a flawed environment.


Premise 3: An all good God’s objective must be the complete maximization of joy and total elimination of suffering for conscious beings.


Premise 4: An all powerful God can directly grant total bliss without relying on intermediate tools, tradeoffs, or testing mechanisms.


Premise 5: Any degree of discomfort or suffering no matter how small proves reality is not maximized for bliss.


Conclusion: Therefore, an all powerful, all good God does not exist, as any permitted pain is an unforced design flaw.

@xye
Destroying pain and suffering would get rid of free will. Jesus Christ himself suffered intense suffering and pain due to his sacrifice
 
  • +1
Reactions: JewishNationalist
Premise 1: Human experience reduces entirely to joy or suffering, making the maximization of bliss and minimization of pain the ultimate driver of all action.


Premise 2: "Virtue" “free will” and "character" are not intrinsic ends, but merely instrumental tools used to reduce suffering in a flawed environment.


Premise 3: An all good God’s objective must be the complete maximization of joy and total elimination of suffering for conscious beings.


Premise 4: An all powerful God can directly grant total bliss without relying on intermediate tools, tradeoffs, or testing mechanisms.


Premise 5: Any degree of discomfort or suffering no matter how small proves reality is not maximized for bliss.


Conclusion: Therefore, an all powerful, all good God does not exist, as any permitted pain is an unforced design flaw.

@xye
sounds logical until you find out that human experience doesn't reduce to joy and suffering
although even in this case it doesn't sound logical because.... perhaps all powerful all good god just doesn't give a shit about you thus doesn't care if you suffer or feel pleasure. it more like depends how you define what means all good
 
Destroying pain and suffering would get rid of free will. Jesus Christ himself suffered intense suffering and pain due to his sacrifice
free will doesn't exist but yeah reducing human experience to pain and pleasure is retarded
 
Classical theism assigns the trait Omni benevolence to god. That's the biggest issue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
sounds logical until you find out that human experience doesn't reduce to joy and suffering
Everything you do is to fulfill a desire or to stop potential suffering
perhaps all powerful all good god just doesn't give a shit about you thus doesn't care if you suffer or feel pleasure
that would not work under the classical definition of god
 
Classical theism assigns the trait Omni benevolence to god. That's the biggest issue.
If they didn’t then it could work but it’d just be deism and not really a religion
Destroying pain and suffering would get rid of free will. Jesus Christ himself suffered intense suffering and pain due to his sacrifice
see premise 2.
Boasting your religious status doesnt make you any more holy in gods eyes all you can do is preach to people who don’t care
Well both of us like to debate so it’s ok
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamechico
If they didn’t then it could work but it’d just be deism and not really a religion

see premise 2.

Well both of us like to debate so it’s ok
My debates are illogical schizophrenic and hypocritical
 
  • +1
Reactions: ICXCLuvr
Destroying pain and suffering would get rid of free will. Jesus Christ himself suffered intense suffering and pain due to his sacrifice
Also I don’t really value free will,

I think the perfect logically state of existence under a classical god is one that is a state of existence where you are filled with endless bliss. Not a world with free will and decisions. Ofc this world lacks meaning but meaning isn’t intrinsically good
 
Everything you do is to fulfill a desire or to stop potential suffering

that would not work under the classical definition of god
very untrue. pleasure is not the only motivation to do shit, you sometimes do something to become stronger, the powerful. its not about pleasure. if it was all about pleasure then everyone would be a drug addict now.
and classical definition of god usually means all good all knowing all powerful. but it doesn't necessary imply your own definition of whats good and whats bad lmfao. perhaps god is not a hedonist lol
 
you sometimes do something to become stronger, the powerful
Being stronger makes you happy.
if it was all about pleasure then everyone would be a drug addict now.
Being a drug addict has other effects that can ruin your life and make you unhappy, planning in the long run for decisions makes you happy. You can’t escape the premise.
but it doesn't necessary imply your own definition of whats good and whats bad lmfao. perhaps god is not a hedonist lol
Gratuitous suffering is universally seen as bad across every moral framework
 
Being stronger makes you happy.

Being a drug addict has other effects that can ruin your life and make you unhappy, planning in the long run for decisions makes you happy. You can’t escape the premise.

Gratuitous suffering is universally seen as bad across every moral framework
retarded hedonist assumption that pleasure is meaning of life
i was proven that most people wouldn't like to feel pleasure 24/7 of the time
 
retarded hedonist assumption that pleasure is good on its own (no)
Then what is good? And what is the purpose of things that are good? No matter how you boil it down it is maximize joy and happiness. Morality exists to maximize joy and limit suffering, you say don’t stab people because it would make someone unhappy and suffer

Morality cannot exist independently of happiness or suffering lol
i was proven that most people wouldn't like to feel pleasure 24/7 of the time
Then Why are we here living? Traceback every thing someone does in their daily life. This is true of all conscious organisms too.
 
Then what is good? And what is the purpose of things that are good? No matter how you boil it down it is maximize joy and happiness. Morality exists to maximize joy and limit suffering, you say don’t stab people because it would make someone unhappy and suffer

Morality cannot exist independently of happiness or suffering lol
good is all that increases power, feeling of power and power itself in man. its not necessary about pleasure
Then Why are we here living? Traceback every thing someone does in their daily life. This is true of all conscious organisms too.
all is do is to increase my power, not pleasure
 
good is all that increases power, feeling of power and power itself in man. its not necessary about pleasure
I’ve never heard of this unique definition of morality, so punching someone and dominating them is good then? It makes you feel powerful. Also feeling powerful is quite subjective, winning in a video game makes someone feel powerful, it’s the ultimate good now I guess
all is do is to increase my power, not pleasure
having power brings you joy.

You are probably just some edgy kid not yet suitable for these type of topics lol. That’s why I had to re explain the framework multiple times to you. Goodnight
 
I’ve never heard of this unique definition of morality, so punching someone and dominating them is good then? It makes you feel powerful. Also feeling powerful is quite subjective, winning in a video game makes someone feel powerful, it’s the ultimate good now I guess
yes domination and punching weaklings is a sign that you are good, because weakness itself is bad. and pleasure here is more like a bonus for being powerful, but again, pleasure is not good/bad on its own, neither suffering is
having power brings you joy.
baseless claim
You are probably just some edgy kid not yet suitable for these type of topics lol. That’s why I had to re explain the framework multiple times to you. Goodnight
okay, keep thinking that pleasure is the greatest good lmfao
 

Similar threads

ANON
Replies
6
Views
57
ANON
ANON
ES1123
Replies
7
Views
78
ES1123
ES1123
Axton
Replies
14
Views
96
howuglyami
howuglyami
ESR
Replies
3
Views
38
bimaxmaxxer
bimaxmaxxer
gandylite.
Replies
22
Views
190
Looksmax.meOg2019
Looksmax.meOg2019

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top