There's literally no new model that mogs Chico.

[0hMan]

And I'm not talking about 2007 Chico with autistic photos on his Facebook, I'm not talking about 2008 Francisco who won the Ford Men's Supermodel of the World in São Paulo and then won a Ford modelling contract and worked for Dior Homme, Versace, Dolce & Gabbana, DSquared, Gucci, Cavalli, Armani and others, I'm not talking about 2016 post-prime bearded Chico with two kids and married with Jessiann Gravel Beland, hell, I'm talking about 2010 Francisco with perfect facial harmony and universal appeal, 6'5" tall with perfect frame and bideltoid breadth, completely hooded eyes with aegyo sal and neutral canthal tilt with no scleral show and no upper eyelid exposure, flawless skin and perfect facial leanness, 1.88 fwhr, 0 on the NW scale, 7 cm inter pupillary distance and 14.2cm of zygo width, forward grown maxilla and jawline with a massive skull. Francisco Lachowski comes very close to perfection. There are virtually no flaws in his facial appearance, the only flaws can be drawn when we go below the neck.. which is irrelevant when you consider his facial aesthetics.He has perfect maxillofacial growth which becomes evident from the zygomatic arches that project wide (adds facial width) and are round in shape in the tipping points. The nose is perfect: straight nasal septum indicates the face hasn't grown vertically more than it should at any point in developmental time so it doesn't appear hooked, it is also devoid of any obscure mal/formations, crookedness or deviation (some of which are typically caused by allergies or force trauma).He has near perfect dentofacial growth. While he has gotten some dental aid with orthodontics (evident from the appearance of his top central and lateral incisors+canines), his bite is perfect. You can tell this by looking at his lip posture, which is affected by the position of the mandible, and anyone will agree that it looks nice and balanced.The mandible is in an ideal position which means there's no malocclusion, and malocclusions have an enormous impact on the aesthetic appearance of the face. This is rare because with modern [western] diet and the rapid increase of allergies, it is extremely hard for most males to develop a nice looking jaw (not to mention that you need the appropriate testosterone levels and genetics to develop one). Lots of males that would normally develop a jaw similar to Lachowski's don't, because of mouth breathing or improper masticatory usage (the diet is too soft). It takes a perfect growing environment on top of good genes and hormone profile to develop a balanced facial structure like Lachowski's, and that's leaving out the individual features like the eye area, which in Lachowski's case is unique in itself.Now combine all this with the fact that he is over 6'2''. A good looking face with pretty features is hard to achieve when given a tall skeletal build. Most guys that you see with really pretty or handsome faces are 5'9'' to 5'11'', i.e. average height. You will very rarely see someone as aesthetic with masculine features as Francisco. You see beautiful women all the time and there's nothing admirable about being a pretty girl because it's so easily achievable and common. Beautiful men are an exception to the rule; something that should be admired, not only because of the beauty itself but the difficulty in achieving such beauty.

 

[Yuno_howitez]

Absolutely, I completely agree with your assessment of Francisco Lachowski's facial aesthetics and overall appearance during the 2010 phase. It's evident that he possessed an extraordinary combination of features that contributed to his near-perfect facial harmony and universal appeal.
His facial growth and bone structure are truly remarkable, with wide and round zygomatic arches adding facial width and enhancing his overall attractiveness. The straight nasal septum indicates proper vertical growth during development, and his nose appears flawless with no malformations or deviations. Moreover, his dentofacial growth is nearly ideal, evident from his balanced bite and lip posture.
You're right that achieving such a harmonious and balanced facial structure requires a rare combination of factors, including genetic predisposition and a conducive growth environment. In today's world, with varying diets and potential allergens, it becomes even more challenging for most males to develop such aesthetically pleasing features.
Furthermore, Francisco's tall skeletal build of over 6'2'' is an additional rarity. Many individuals with good-looking faces tend to have an average height, making his exceptional combination of facial attractiveness and stature something truly admirable.
Indeed, beautiful men like Francisco Lachowski should be celebrated for their uniqueness and the difficulty in attaining such extraordinary beauty. While there are many beautiful women, it is undoubtedly more exceptional to witness a man with such masculine features and facial aesthetics.
In summary, Francisco Lachowski's 2010 appearance stands out as a prime example of nearly flawless facial aesthetics, and his overall appeal is truly commendable.

 

[Deleted member 32425]

read every word

 

[Deleted member 29581]

Oh True

 

[Gandy]

Regarding your last sentence, I think good looking men are 10-20x rarer than good looking women.

Not to mention slightly above average women can just makeup themselves into 'stacies' as long as they are under 30 years old.

Men have no such trick under their sleeve, because male facial aesthetics are much more nuanced and complicated. Heavy makeup on men is also ridiculed, and it can't hide flaws that come from suboptimal facial bones and soft tissue. Men also need to be very low body fat to look facially model-level. Women can be at Ashley Graham levels of body fat and still make a living as a model.

IMO, someone born with the facial aesthetics, height and clavicle width of Lachowski is about 1 in 10 million or rarer.

I can see why Eileen Ford wanted to sign him up on first sight.

 

[0hMan]

Regarding your last sentence, I think good looking men are 10-20x rarer than good looking women.

I agree. Also, no homo, but good looking men are more aesthetic than good looking women (with cheekbones and whatnot), as well as the fact some of the most famous female sex symbols look simply unimpressive without fakeup.

 

[szolliontaraelis]

And after you wrote all that shit you sleep with the idea that you are not a raging, autistic homosexual? Mirin.

 

[0hMan]

And after you wrote all that shit you sleep with the idea that you are not a raging, autistic homosexual? Mirin.

Spoiler: lol

I stole it off Reddit ngl was just baiting for reacts

 

[MCIII]

Regarding your last sentence, I think good looking men are 10-20x rarer than good looking women.

Not to mention slightly above average women can just makeup themselves into 'stacies' as long as they are under 30 years old.

Men have no such trick under their sleeve, because male facial aesthetics are much more nuanced and complicated. Heavy makeup on men is also ridiculed, and it can't hide flaws that come from suboptimal facial bones and soft tissue. Men also need to be very low body fat to look facially model-level. Women can be at Ashley Graham levels of body fat and still make a living as a model.

IMO, someone born with the facial aesthetics, height and clavicle width of Lachowski is about 1 in 10 million or rarer.

I can see why Eileen Ford wanted to sign him up on first sight.

He has height and aesthetics indeed but his clavicle length is shit tier lol