in DMs but there will be an old pic with shaven legs. because I'm too lazy to shave them now
I'm 18
The most heterosexual Gayrab
no, where did you get that from
what
Youre Russian with dark features
I'm not dark JFL
here's a lot of religioncels
Кому не похуй на эти темы
fair enough. even religious people know deep down there aren’t any gods. for lots of people though following everything in the bible or whatever else works very well for them whether they’re actually so delusional to be a creationist or not
да многим так то
both
jesus roped because his gonial angle wasn’t good enough
idk never fucked a femboy (I'm the one)
the things i would do to you behind closed door
are you homosexual?
God must necessarily be absolute, unlimited. But an absolute, unlimited god is incapable of manifesting himself. That which does not manifest itself in any way simply does not exist.
Studies show that the same stimuli you get from seeing women is the same you get from femboys so technically fucking them or becoming one isn't all that gay, it's straighter than taking tren at least lmao
So let me get this straight, are you talking about a monotheistic God which falls under classical theism.
it is asserted that God exists, then the one who asserts it is obliged to prove it. It is the duty of the denier to refute the evidence put forward by the assertor. All evidence of God's existence without exception has been refuted. Moreover, scientists have come to the conclusion that it is impossible to prove the existence of God in principle. Therefore, the assertion that God exists has no basis and, according to the law of logic, is not true, that is, it is false. Only facts and logic should be relied upon when proving the existence of something. This is the scientific method. Therefore, when proving the existence of God, one must also rely on facts and logic. A scientific hypothesis is an assumption in which, based on the available facts, a preliminary conclusion is made about the existence of an object, the cause of a phenomenon, etc. The hypothesis is put forward for subsequent verification and proof. God does not manifest himself in any way, so there is no basis for putting forward a scientific hypothesis in order to verify and prove the existence of God. For science, God is nothing, zero, absolute emptiness
Lol, you just copy pasted some shit from an ai or Jewgle.
about monotheism. But no pagan spirits exist either.
What did you mean by "Manifesting himself" again?
niggas will say anything to justify being a raging faggot
no one has ever seen, heard or felt him etc.
And why does that need to be the case?
Dude, if it doesn't manifest itself in any way, doesn't interact with the Universe and people, no one has seen, heard, or discovered God with the help of modern devices, and all this is irrefutable proof of the non-existence of God
I mean, how the fuck does it mean he doesn't exist?
Think about it, if the probability of the truth of the hypothesis "God exists" should be a function of two arguments: the hypothesis itself and the available knowledge. There is no knowledge about God, since he does not manifest himself. Under such circumstances, it is impossible to put forward a scientific hypothesis about the existence of God. The circle is closed. The probability of the existence of God is equal to... zero
Shave now
How tf would it be 0% nigga, God doesn't interact with shit = we don't know = 50/50.
