This German dating app shows that women favor relationships

AlexAP

AlexAP

Fuchsia
Joined
Nov 3, 2020
Posts
14,157
Reputation
29,698
Parship is a German dating app. The users who sign up don't have profile pics, they just have to answer many questions about themselves (of course, they can send pics after they matched). The users can't swipe on each other, users are matched by the app based on algorithms that predict compatibility. And, users have to pay about 45 euros (50 dollars) every month to stay in the app.

So, it's basically an app that is designed for relationships, not hookups. Guess what? The users are 55% female and 45% male. This is very uncommon for dating apps, as Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, etc. have always at least 70-80% male users.

The fact that 55% of the users of this relationship-based dating app are female (and there are millions of users) show that women clearly favor relationships over hookups. They are ready to pay a lot of money to be matched by an algorithm with a person that they can't see before.

There is actually another app that is similar to Parship, called Elitepartner, and this app has more female than male users too. This stats show: It's very difficult for men to get hookups, but very easy for women. But when it comes to relationships, the chances are more equally for both genders.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: borismonster, Beetlejuice, Patriot and 12 others
Yes, Roasties are ready to settle for their beta buxx.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: borismonster, 5'8manlet, AlwaysHaveQuestions and 13 others
0
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot
yes with chad only
 
  • +1
Reactions: Beetlejuice and turkproducer
That would be so much more brutal, you and the girl are interested, then you send your face and she backs out
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: borismonster, AlwaysHaveQuestions, Beetlejuice and 15 others
That would be so much more brutal, you and the girl are interested, then you send your face and she backs out
There are some users who said that happens lol. But there are many average-looking couples who found themselves there too, so it works for enough people.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: borismonster, Deleted member 5786, Chadeep and 1 other person
Parship is a German dating app. The users who sign up don't have profile pics, they just have to answer many questions about themselves (of course, they can send pics after they matched). The users can't swipe on each other, users are matched by the app based on algorithms that predict compatibility. And, users have to pay about 45 euros (50 dollars) every month to stay in the app.

So, it's basically an app that is designed for relationships, not hookups. Guess what? The users are 55% female and 45% male. This is very uncommon for dating apps, as Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, OkCupid, etc. have always at least 70-80% male users.

The fact that 55% of the users of this relationship-based dating app are female (and there are millions of users) show that women clearly favor relationships over hookups. They are ready to pay a lot of money to be matched by an algorithm with a person that they can't see before.

There is actually another app that is similar to Parship, called Elitepartner, and this app has more female than male users too. This stats show: It's very difficult for men to get hookups, but very easy for women. But when it comes to relationships, the chances are more equally for both genders.

(Here the website)
Women want to lock down chad in LTR, so they use dating apps where they are matched with men who want LTR. Women pick the chads and meet them.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Eduardo DOV
I need this app in my country :feelswhy:

Imagine @Amnesia using the app, he would get 0 matches :lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jagged0, Eduardo DOV, gamma and 4 others
There are some users who said that happens lol. But there are many average-looking couples who found themselves there too, so it works for enough people.
What is the average age on Parship and Elitepartner? If most women on the apps are >30 or >40 a guy in his 20s has no reason to use them over tinder/instagram.
 
Bruda lies den Scheiss hier: https://www.derwesten.de/panorama/parship-die-singles-und-der-11-minuten-irrglaube-id11443266.html


Firefox 2021 09 02 12 50 35
 
What is the average age on Parship and Elitepartner? If most women on the apps are >30 or >40 a guy in his 20s has no reason to use them over tinder/instagram.
Most users are in their 20s and 30s. That's not different from Tinder btw, there are more users on Tinder who are 30-44 than 18-29.
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 5786 and thisend
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 5786 and thisend
200416_PS_ART-4530_VideoDate_HomepageModul_316x300-x1x.png
it's over.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5786
1630580205572

200.gif
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, 5'8manlet, Deleted member 14867 and 7 others
Yes, most users won't find a partner. What does this prove? Of course, these apps don't work for everyone, not even for the majority, this is normal. I was only talking about the gender ratio.

Up to age 35 the site has more men than women just like any other dating site.
The statistics in your first post contain women >35 who no one except defective milf hunters want.
Online dating is a joke.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: turkproducer and lutte
And what proportion of the population of the userbase is this.
1630580530067

Women are increasingly more promiscous and slutty no cap. The data show this. The only girls who want LTR's are age 10 - 15.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Eduardo DOV

Up to age 35 the site has more men than women just like any other dating site.
The statistics in your first post contain women >35 who no one except defective milf hunters want.
Online dating is a joke.
I saw these stats.
View attachment 1298130
And people are matched according to their age range. A men in his 20s will be matched with a woman is her 20s, etc.
@FastBananaCEO try hunting some german milfs here instead
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 13787 and gamma
Up to age 35 the site has more men than women just like any other dating site.
True, but it's very different from Tinder, that has 80% men.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thisend, Deleted member 5786 and Deleted member 5189
Average LTR lasts 6 months these days.
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster, thisend, turkproducer and 1 other person
And what proportion of the population of the userbase is this.
View attachment 1298131
Women are increasingly more promiscous and slutty no cap. The data show this. The only girls who want LTR's are age 10 - 15.
The data shows that the top 5% promiscuous women are more promiscuous. And who cares about that, there will always be promiscuous women.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: borismonster, thisend and Deleted member 5786
Afafafaf

The only relevant age groups are these 2 and then mostly the left category since women in their early 30s are often single moms already and rapidly losing their fertility.
Put ur tinder on 28-34 and check out the shitshow that is that female age range. The amount of undateable women in that category is insane. Single moms, obese women, divorcees with a wall of misandric text in their bio, and so on.

Basically the men in the age 25-34 category are also looking for women in the 18-24 category, also because women practically only date men older than themselves. So the numbers are actually way more skewed than these graphs show.

So the conclusion is still that you are competing with 2-3 men for 1 girl. But I guess it's still better to try, probably attracts a different crowd that you may vibe with better.
 
Average LTR lasts 6 months these days.
Average LTR is basically what a FwB was back in the day.

Average marriage is what a LTR was back in the day.
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster, Chadeep and sorrowfulsad
The data shows that the top 5% promiscuous women are more promiscuous. And who cares about that, there will always be promiscuous women.
There was a statistic showing that the average women is 10x more promiscuous before and the most successful marriages are body counts 0 -1
and women with body counts higher then 1 are exponentially more likely to cheat, you retard. JFL @ your minuscule iq, if you cannot even realize that modern women are extremely promiscuous. Thats why divorce rates are extremely high, because women are extremely slutty whores that need to be brutally killed in minecraft. You low iq baboon.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster and AlexAP
80cf15f96a33947c0020b742e14d8e42
2020 06 14
1507701688830
Wolfinger sex partners divorce figure 1 1

@AlexAP sub 50 iq tard:feelsuhh:
 
Basically the men in the age 25-34 category are also looking for women in the 18-24 category, also because women practically only date men older than themselves. So the numbers are actually way more skewed than these graphs show.
The users are matched by the app, they don't swipe on each other. Most users who are 25+ will not be matched with women who are 18-20. Maybe some users who are 26 will be matched with 22 yo, but most will stay within their age range.

So, it's not 2:1 or 3:1, it's more like 1.3:1 or so, so still more men, but not nearly as bad as Tinder where it's 4:1.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5786 and Deleted member 275
There was a statistic showing that the average women is 10x more promiscuous before
Wrong.
and the most successful marriages are body counts 0 -1 and women with body counts higher then 1 are exponentially more likely to cheat, you retard.
Women with bodycount of 1 are women who are very religious or married their first boyfriend that they met when they were 16-18. Good luck with finding that.
Thats why divorce rates are extremely high, because women are extremely slutty whores that need to be brutally killed in minecraft. You low iq baboon.
Divorce rates are lower today than before 2-3 decades.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 5786
Most users who are 25+ will not be matched with women who are 18-20.
Considering I am 26yo, then there's already no point in using this app for me :lul::lul:

fucking brutal. Roasties only for me
 
Wrong.

Women with bodycount of 1 are women who are very religious or married their first boyfriend that they met when they were 16-18. Good luck with finding that.

Divorce rates are lower today than before 2-3 decades.
look at these stats idiot @AlexAP 60%+ women had 0-1 partners and their marriages were much better, even tho there are less diovrces the marriage stability is horrible, have fun with your becky who has had 100000 bbcs and chad dicks rammed up her asshole
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster
60%+ women had 0-1 partners and their marriages were much better
Lol 60% of women had 0-1 partners in the 1970s, and the divorce rates of couples who married in the 1970s were very high, higher than today.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: gamma and Deleted member 5786
Lol 60% of women had 0-1 partners in the 1970s, and the divorce rates of couples who married in the 1970s was very high, higher than today.
Divorce rates don't mean that much anyways. Back in the days it was very much frowned upon to divorce for example. Not done.

The result is that you have marriages such as that of my parents where they hate eachother, theres 0 love/affection, but they refuse to divorce due to perceived social shame.

I would argue most of the divorces nowadays happen due to there being little to no pressure in staying together anymore. So once a marriage turns bad, ppl just quit it. That's not really worse since a shit marriage is much worse than no marriage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster and GigaChaddam
Lol 60% of women had 0-1 partners in the 1970s, and the divorce rates of couples who married in the 1970s was very high, higher than today.
Because women need betabuxx and they cheat on their partners with chads, tyrones etc while married.
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster
Divorce rates don't mean that much anyways. Back in the days it was very much frowned upon to divorce for example. Not done.

The result is that you have marriages such as that of my parents where they hate eachother, theres 0 love/affection, but they refuse to divorce due to perceived social shame.

I would argue most of the divorces nowadays happen due to there being little to no pressure in staying together anymore. So once a marriage turns bad, ppl just quit it. That's not really worse since a shit marriage is much worse than no marriage. But perhaps some marriages could've been saved with more effort/time, but yeah who knows what the net effect is.
He is a bluepilled normie coping tbh
 
Divorce rates don't mean that much anyways. Back in the days it was very much frowned upon to divorce for example. Not done.

The result is that you have marriages such as that of my parents where they hate eachother, theres 0 love/affection, but they refuse to divorce due to perceived social shame.

I would argue most of the divorces nowadays happen due to there being little to no pressure in staying together anymore. So once a marriage turns bad, ppl just quit it. That's not really worse since a shit marriage is much worse than no marriage.
Yes I think it's better to divorce than stay in an unhappy marriage. Many marriages from the past were not based on love, so it's no wonder the divorce rate grew when women didn't need a provider as much as before.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: borismonster, gamma, Deleted member 5786 and 1 other person
Yes I think it's better to divorce than stay in an unhappy marriage. Many marriages from the past were not based on love, so it's no wonder the divorce rate grew when women didn't need a provider as much as before.
True. Men just need to make sure they always have a prenup and they keep a separate social life, finances away from their wife. And keep looksmaxxing. Because divorce is a normal part of life so you need to be prepared for it and not get fucked over like many men have in the past.

It prob leads to healthier relationships anyways since women will know that you have options and will not become 0 effort landwhales knowing you are stuck with them, etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster, thisend and AlexAP
Yes I think it's better to divorce than stay in an unhappy marriage. Many marriages from the past were not based on love, so it's no wonder the divorce rate grew when women didn't need a provider as much as before.
No they were love based, just cos ur mum took 100 bbcs and didnt divorce ur dad because she needed money doesnt mean she loved him:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: borismonster
There are some users who said that happens lol. But there are many average-looking couples who found themselves there too, so it works for enough people.
age of the women on this app?
 

Similar threads

molotov
Replies
4
Views
66
shandingo
shandingo
Kelner
Replies
0
Views
15
Kelner
Kelner
mr123456
Replies
7
Views
50
L(oser)ooksmaxxer
L(oser)ooksmaxxer
qqndroo
Replies
7
Views
55
qqndroo
qqndroo
realshit
Replies
2
Views
71
asuframe
asuframe

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →