This is what the perfect face would look like - 100% frontal harmony morph

[adeeyeah]

esr: 0.464 t1
facial thirds: t1
32,32%
31,82%
35,86%

Canthal tilt: 8.5* t1
fwhr: 1.91 t1
jaw frontal angle: 91* t1
Total facial width to height ratio: 1.367 t1
Bigonial width: 87.5% t1
chin to philtrum ratio: 0.269 t1 (masc 2.2-2.8 range)
neck width: 97% t1
Midface ratio: 1.009
Mouth to nose ratio: 1.525
Eye aspect ratio: 3.5
Inter canthal distance ratio: 96*
Eyebrow setedness: 0.94
Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.558
Deviation of jfa and iaa: no deviation
Eyebrow tilt: 6.5*
Bitemporal width: 93%
Lower third proportion: 0.317
Ipsilateral alar angle: 91*

Passes all most crucial ratios with ease (or maybe not)
just appreciate the effort

i also used ai face swap app to see how it would look in motion. I think it did a decent job although the harmony and features appear to be slightly off.

Whole process took us around 4 hours.

Ai generated base we started with:

We also played with this side profile however no clear ratios can be measured since its not facing us at the proper angle. But i can assure it would certainly score above 97% side harmony.

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Crazy how I still mog this robot

 

[Samsepioler]

first ai generated one looks better

 

[adeeyeah]

first ai generated one looks better

For sure yet it has flawed fwhr and midface ratios from what i remember didnt really measure the original

 

[Tensor]

esr: 0.464 t1
facial thirds: t1
32,32%
31,82%
35,86%

Canthal tilt: 8.5* t1
fwhr: 1.91 t1
jaw frontal angle: 91* t1
Total facial width to height ratio: 1.367 t1
Bigonial width: 87.5% t1
chin to philtrum ratio: 0.269 t1 (masc 2.2-2.8 range)
neck width: 97% t1
Midface ratio: 1.009
Mouth to nose ratio: 1.525
Eye aspect ratio: 3.5
Inter canthal distance ratio: 96*
Eyebrow setedness: 0.94
Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.558
Deviation of jfa and iaa: no deviation
Eyebrow tilt: 6.5*
Bitemporal width: 93%
Lower third proportion: 0.317
Ipsilateral alar angle: 91*

Passes all most crucial ratios with ease (or maybe not)
just appreciate the effort

View attachment 4540175

i also used ai face swap app to see how it would look in motion. I think it did a decent job although the harmony and features appear to be slightly off.

View attachment 4540189View attachment 4540254

Whole process took us around 4 hours.
View attachment 4540209View attachment 4540226View attachment 4540211

Ai generated base we started with:
View attachment 4540233



We also played with this side profile however no clear ratios can be measured since its not facing us at the proper angle. But i can assure it would certainly score above 97% side harmony.

View attachment 4540241

Us btw

 

[Samsepioler]

For sure yet it has flawed fwhr and midface ratios from what i remember didnt really measure the original

its just appealing to the eye ig

 

[Tensor]

esr: 0.464 t1
facial thirds: t1
32,32%
31,82%
35,86%

Canthal tilt: 8.5* t1
fwhr: 1.91 t1
jaw frontal angle: 91* t1
Total facial width to height ratio: 1.367 t1
Bigonial width: 87.5% t1
chin to philtrum ratio: 0.269 t1 (masc 2.2-2.8 range)
neck width: 97% t1
Midface ratio: 1.009
Mouth to nose ratio: 1.525
Eye aspect ratio: 3.5
Inter canthal distance ratio: 96*
Eyebrow setedness: 0.94
Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.558
Deviation of jfa and iaa: no deviation
Eyebrow tilt: 6.5*
Bitemporal width: 93%
Lower third proportion: 0.317
Ipsilateral alar angle: 91*

Passes all most crucial ratios with ease (or maybe not)
just appreciate the effort

View attachment 4540175

i also used ai face swap app to see how it would look in motion. I think it did a decent job although the harmony and features appear to be slightly off.

View attachment 4540189View attachment 4540254

Whole process took us around 4 hours.
View attachment 4540209View attachment 4540226View attachment 4540211

Ai generated base we started with:
View attachment 4540233



We also played with this side profile however no clear ratios can be measured since its not facing us at the proper angle. But i can assure it would certainly score above 97% side harmony.

View attachment 4540241

You said us who did you do it with?

 

[adeeyeah]

its just appealing to the eye ig

unironically appeal wise the original wins. proves appeal > textbook ratios
But again depends, women would want the original face but imagine them standing next to each other, ogre morph mogs

 

[adeeyeah]

You said us who did you do it with?

Guy named steve

 

[turkcelfatcel]

esr: 0.464 t1
facial thirds: t1
32,32%
31,82%
35,86%

Canthal tilt: 8.5* t1
fwhr: 1.91 t1
jaw frontal angle: 91* t1
Total facial width to height ratio: 1.367 t1
Bigonial width: 87.5% t1
chin to philtrum ratio: 0.269 t1 (masc 2.2-2.8 range)
neck width: 97% t1
Midface ratio: 1.009
Mouth to nose ratio: 1.525
Eye aspect ratio: 3.5
Inter canthal distance ratio: 96*
Eyebrow setedness: 0.94
Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.558
Deviation of jfa and iaa: no deviation
Eyebrow tilt: 6.5*
Bitemporal width: 93%
Lower third proportion: 0.317
Ipsilateral alar angle: 91*

Passes all most crucial ratios with ease (or maybe not)
just appreciate the effort

View attachment 4540175

i also used ai face swap app to see how it would look in motion. I think it did a decent job although the harmony and features appear to be slightly off.

View attachment 4540189View attachment 4540254

Whole process took us around 4 hours.
View attachment 4540209View attachment 4540226View attachment 4540211

Ai generated base we started with:
View attachment 4540233



We also played with this side profile however no clear ratios can be measured since its not facing us at the proper angle. But i can assure it would certainly score above 97% side harmony.

View attachment 4540241

Why did u doxx me wtf mods ban

 

[adeeyeah]

Why did u doxx me wtf mods ban

Accidental doxx while spying on the uk government

 

[Tenres]

upper to lower lip does not look ideal at all. would be interested to see that adjusted to see if that's whats messing up the harmony.

 

[Panchitosbroncs]

esr: 0.464 t1
facial thirds: t1
32,32%
31,82%
35,86%

Canthal tilt: 8.5* t1
fwhr: 1.91 t1
jaw frontal angle: 91* t1
Total facial width to height ratio: 1.367 t1
Bigonial width: 87.5% t1
chin to philtrum ratio: 0.269 t1 (masc 2.2-2.8 range)
neck width: 97% t1
Midface ratio: 1.009
Mouth to nose ratio: 1.525
Eye aspect ratio: 3.5
Inter canthal distance ratio: 96*
Eyebrow setedness: 0.94
Lower to upper lip ratio: 1.558
Deviation of jfa and iaa: no deviation
Eyebrow tilt: 6.5*
Bitemporal width: 93%
Lower third proportion: 0.317
Ipsilateral alar angle: 91*

Passes all most crucial ratios with ease (or maybe not)
just appreciate the effort

View attachment 4540175

i also used ai face swap app to see how it would look in motion. I think it did a decent job although the harmony and features appear to be slightly off.

View attachment 4540189View attachment 4540254

Whole process took us around 4 hours.
View attachment 4540209View attachment 4540226View attachment 4540211

Ai generated base we started with:
View attachment 4540233



We also played with this side profile however no clear ratios can be measured since its not facing us at the proper angle. But i can assure it would certainly score above 97% side harmony.

View attachment 4540241

This is how I look btw way

 

[adeeyeah]

upper to lower lip does not look ideal at all. would be interested to see that adjusted to see if that's whats messing up the harmony.

It can’t be… ill measure it tomorrow

 

[Tenres]

It can’t be… ill measure it tomorrow

I assume you measured from the bottom of the cupids bow, so I think for men you would ideally be getting close to 2. Could also be pheno irregularity because white people won't usually have lips like that.

 

[iamgoingtoascend]

Original has female gaze eyes while the morph has male gaze eyes. Give the morph the originals eyes and it would be better.

Also, the jaw on the morph almost looks a bit too projected/boxy IMO. Almost looks a bit bloated.

Otherwise perfect morph ngl brotha