Mansur
Every Cope has an End
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2024
- Posts
- 557
- Reputation
- 464
The ratio Im referring to is the Medial Canthal angle
According to CA the ideal range is 20-42 degrees and somehow he is the only one using this ratio.
Noone ever spoke about this surprisingly even tho this measurement is valued quite not low at 10 points
However noone knows the other ranges for T2 T3 for this ratio.
The reason why this ratio should be deleted is because this measurement doesnt really mean much. Its about how sharp your inner eye corners are and the range is absurdly low ( Ive analysed a lot of faces and rarely got someone who fell in the ideal range )
The EAR should be enough as a ratio to tell how compact the eye shape is.
You will only fall into this ratio if your medial canthus is super elongated and deep ( not downturned )
For example here is O'Prys Eye area, Josh Hartnetts and even Eriksens whose eyes have obviously an exceptional medial canthus, however even he barely meets the ideal range.
CA probably sees Salludons canthus as the ideal. Because I dont know what he was on when making this ratio
o Pry is known for his eye area, we can all agree on that his eye shape is narrow. He also has very straight lower eyelids but even that isnt enough to make it to the ideal
if Eriksens Medial Canthus is seen as barely sharp then there is obviously something wrong here
In conclusion just dont stress about it, noone uses it anyways. so It wont be cope if you dont consider that to your harmony score.
According to CA the ideal range is 20-42 degrees and somehow he is the only one using this ratio.
Noone ever spoke about this surprisingly even tho this measurement is valued quite not low at 10 points
However noone knows the other ranges for T2 T3 for this ratio.
The reason why this ratio should be deleted is because this measurement doesnt really mean much. Its about how sharp your inner eye corners are and the range is absurdly low ( Ive analysed a lot of faces and rarely got someone who fell in the ideal range )
The EAR should be enough as a ratio to tell how compact the eye shape is.
You will only fall into this ratio if your medial canthus is super elongated and deep ( not downturned )
For example here is O'Prys Eye area, Josh Hartnetts and even Eriksens whose eyes have obviously an exceptional medial canthus, however even he barely meets the ideal range.
CA probably sees Salludons canthus as the ideal. Because I dont know what he was on when making this ratio
In conclusion just dont stress about it, noone uses it anyways. so It wont be cope if you dont consider that to your harmony score.
