this site's ratings are quite fucked

[i14bytes]

i have become better and better looking since i joined 3 years ago.

in 2023, this shit was getting rated ltn and mtn rates.

. posted these two pics still getting rated the same. am i severely delusional or does everyone underrate nowadays or was everyone just generous back in 2023

 

[i14bytes]

2nd pic is me at leanest body fat which is like 15. third is back to 19. still i do think i look overall quite a bit better, so it seems weird my rate seems to have stayed the same

 

[iwannasleeponurlap]

lltn to lhtn or smth
im proud of u

 

[crazyguy]

i have become better and better looking since i joined 3 years ago. View attachment 5076615in 2023, this shit was getting rated ltn and mtn rates. View attachment 5076618View attachment 5076622. posted these two pics still getting rated the same. am i severely delusional or does everyone underrate nowadays or was everyone just generous back in 2023

ur a lltn in ur best pic.

 

[i14bytes]

ur a lltn in ur best pic.

hm whatever brah. i give up. guess its time to rope huh

 

[crazyguy]

hm whatever brah. i give up. guess its time to rope huh

is that ur gf in the 2nd pic

 

[i14bytes]

is that ur gf in the 2nd pic

no just a slay

 

[crazyguy]

no just a slay

so why do u care about what .org users think if ur getting women

 

[i14bytes]

so why do u care about what .org users think if ur getting women

i dont care personally. its just that objective ratings dont seem to have any objectivity in them anymore. the new users dont seem to follow a system of rules when rating which irritates me.

 

[i14bytes]

so why do u care about what .org users think if ur getting women

ideally, a psl rate is given off dimo/misc/ang and harmony. they just give whatever they feel like which goes against the whole concept of a rating doesnt it

 

[crazyguy]

i dont care personally. its just that objective ratings dont seem to have any objectivity in them anymore. the new users dont seem to follow a system of rules when rating which irritates me.

"objective ratings" is an oxymoron because ratings cannot be objective

 

[i14bytes]

"objective ratings" is an oxymoron because ratings cannot be objective

objectivity in the sense that psl which goes off features that are found in all male models and tries to characterise them into features that would make a face appealing to the broadest range of women, when they lie within the ideal range. Higher levels of dimorphism is going to make you sexually more attractive according to science.

 

[crazyguy]

objectivity in the sense that psl which goes off features that are found in all male models and tries to characterise them into features that would make a face appealing to the broadest range of women, when they lie within the ideal range. Higher levels of dimorphism is going to make you sexually more attractive according to science.

so ur saying the most dimorphic guy attracts the most women

 

[i14bytes]

so ur saying the most dimorphic guy attracts the most women

no didnt say that. was just an example of the different categories that you would characterise a rating into, that would objectively make you more attractive to women

 

[crazyguy]

no didnt say that. was just an example of the different categories that you would characterise a rating into, that would objectively make you more attractive to women

Higher levels of dimorphism is going to make you sexually more attractive according to science.

elaborate

 

[i14bytes]

elaborate

look, if there is no way to be objective about a rating on a looksmax forum, the best way to rate someone is going to be to characterise certain traits and characteristics that would make you more appealing to women. Obviously looking at extremes on each end of a bell curve whether that be ogre tier dimo or subhuman tier dimo is not going to attract the most women, no. but it is a factor of what defines your rating, along with the other categories

 

[crazyguy]

look, if there is no way to be objective about a rating on a looksmax forum, the best way to rate someone is going to be to characterise certain traits and characteristics that would make you more appealing to women. Obviously looking at extremes on each end of a bell curve whether that be ogre tier dimo or subhuman tier dimo is not going to attract the most women, no. but it is a factor of what defines your rating, along with the other categories

so ur saying if we determine the average of each characteristic based on people within the ideal range, u will find whats objectively good looking

 

[Ultimate Subhuman™]

lltn to lhtn or smth
im proud of u

 

[Scars]

i have become better and better looking since i joined 3 years ago. View attachment 5076615in 2023, this shit was getting rated ltn and mtn rates. View attachment 5076618View attachment 5076622. posted these two pics still getting rated the same. am i severely delusional or does everyone underrate nowadays or was everyone just generous back in 2023

in the low htn range

really good ascension no point in even posting for ratings atp

 

[mu3hid]

Hltn - htn good work bhai

 

[i14bytes]

Hltn - htn good work bhai

yeah i dont even know what to rate myself anymore. i look in the mirror and and am unable to rate myself. the only thing i have to o off is people irl telling me im good looking,.

 

[i14bytes]

so ur saying if we determine the average of each characteristic based on people within the ideal range, u will find whats objectively good looking

that appeals to the broadest range of woman. yes