Thoughts on affirmative action being overturned

D

Deleted member 23218

Fire
Joined
Oct 21, 2022
Posts
15,567
Reputation
16,612
@Cheesyrumble ehy counflt this happen earlier brutal for me but I did alright
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Deleted member 24444 and TheAnomaly
Ppl don’t understand what affirmative action means, most of these units are less than 10% black anyway, and legacy admissions is a much bigger issue
 
  • +1
Reactions: hattrick, WeiWei, Deleted member 21716 and 5 others
Was only 2 colleges. Won’t be gone anytime to soon.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 19174, FastBananaCEO, Cheesyrumble and 2 others
Ppl don’t understand what affirmative action means, most of these units are less than 10% black anyway, and legacy admissions is a much bigger issue
Lol they’re acting like black people are taking their spots when the school is like 3% black jfl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: hattrick, ManletBlackcel, enchanted_elixir and 6 others
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur
Was only 2 colleges. Won’t be gone anytime to soon.
Legit went to one of these elite unis and was accepted into Most of them

Ppl think affirmative action means they’re taking in some random underachieving black person from the hood when in reality all the black students I’ve met at these unis had SAT scores and GPAs on par with white and Asian kids
 
  • +1
Reactions: hattrick, Deleted member 19174, nope and 3 others
Nothing will change. The admissions process will just shift to more strongly emphasize muh "personality" which of course will just so happen to favor blacks and cumskins while fucking over ricecels.

In any actual meritocratic system, elite universities would be comprised of 50%+ Asians.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: FastBananaCEO and Deleted member 18522
No it was only Harvard and UNC. Even then, only the conservative states go through with it.
California and other blue states banned race based affirmative action a long time ago cuz their states have more Asians. It’s actually Asians

Ppl ignore the fact that 40% of white kods at Harvard are legacy or faculty’s kids and just blame it on black ppl

But I believe the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action as a practice, meaning all other schools must follow suit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21716, Blackgymmax, FastBananaCEO and 10 others
No it was only Harvard and UNC. Even then, only the conservative states go through with it.
Those are the ones who got sued I got an email from my college (I go to one of these so called “elite” unis) about how they are disappointed but will follow the law
 
  • +1
Reactions: Trilogy, Deleted member 9003 and whiteissuperior
California and other blue states banned race based affirmative action a long time ago cuz their states have more Asians. It’s actually Asians

Ppl ignore the fact that 40% of white kods at Harvard are legacy or faculty’s kids and just blame it on black ppl

But I believe the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action as a practice, meaning all other schools must follow suit
Legacy admission and donor stuff is a bigger issue for the high end private units imo tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteissuperior
Lol they’re acting like black people are taking their spots when the school is like 3% black jfl
just because so few of them qualify even with affirmative action doesn't mean people aren't being discriminated against as a result. all qualification standards beyond actual academic performance should be overturned.
 
Lol they’re acting like black people are taking their spots when the school is like 3% black jfl
It’s usually 20-25 percent Hispanic and black 27 percent at Harvard for example.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
Blacks are underrepresented at Harvard. They weren’t taking Asian niggas’ spots
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteissuperior, PrinceLuenLeoncur and Deleted member 29581
California and other blue states banned race based affirmative action a long time ago cuz their states have more Asians. It’s actually Asians

Ppl ignore the fact that 40% of white kods at Harvard are legacy or faculty’s kids and just blame it on black ppl

But I believe the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action as a practice, meaning all other schools must follow suit
The states still have the final say. Most democratic states won’t go through with it. Kinda like Roe V Wade. But yea people love to dick ride blacks
 
  • +1
Reactions: nope, whiteissuperior, PrinceLuenLeoncur and 2 others
Legacy admission and donor stuff is a bigger issue for the high end private units imo tbh
Yes those are the ones I’m talking about. The Stanford, Harvards, and Princeton tier schools which I went to.

However public school admissions are getting crazy too I’ll admit. It used to be anyone with a 3.8 and 1350 SAT score could get into UCLA, Georgia tech, UNC

but more schools like that have like 12% acceptance rates. That was the acceptance of like Cornell less than a decade ago

I wonder why it’s so hard to get into a good school nowadays
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23218
Glad that im done with that college shit.
I’d suckstart a 12 gauge if I had to go to a school with 50% chinamen
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 28691 and Deleted member 29581
The states still have the final say. Most democratic states won’t go through with it. Kinda like Roe V Wade. But yea people love to dick ride blacks
My college already sent an email that implied they will have to abide even tho they don’t want to I don’t live in any of those two states. It will eventually apply to other colleges if it’s not that way because they would get sued in the same way
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003 and whiteissuperior
The states still have the final say. Most democratic states won’t go through with it. Kinda like Roe V Wade. But yea people love to dick ride blacks
The blue states are more likely to do it imo, cuz they have more Asian constituents. Again, it’s alresdy been banned in California and other blue states for public unis for decades
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
Yes those are the ones I’m talking about. The Stanford, Harvards, and Princeton tier schools which I went to.

However public school admissions are getting crazy too I’ll admit. It used to be anyone with a 3.8 and 1350 SAT score could get into UCLA, Georgia tech, UNC

but more schools like that have like 12% acceptance rates. That was the acceptance of like Cornell less than a decade ago

I wonder why it’s so hard to get into a good school nowadays
Facts I didn’t get into the elite public one I wanted to get int for the major I wanted it’s brootal I gotta pay all thsi dough
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteissuperior
Glad that im done with that college shit.
I’d suckstart a 12 gauge if I had to go to a school with 50% chinamen
which is one of the benefits, more competition means higher overall standards and more motivation for those who are academically inclined. a lot of universities are nothing more than an extension of high school. universities should be more exclusive
 
idk in German tv they said its an attack on diversity, fucking propaganda!!!
 
The blue states are more likely to do it imo, cuz they have more Asian constituents. Again, it’s alresdy been banned in California and other blue states for public unis for decades
Would you say UCs have been effective with adhering to no AA or you think they’re using “holistic admissions” as a method to admit more minority students?
 
  • +1
Reactions: rand anon
@Collagen or rope Asian mogger who got into pton despite AA thoughts?
 
just because so few of them qualify even with affirmative action doesn't mean people aren't being discriminated against as a result. all qualification standards beyond actual academic performance should be overturned.
You’re not entitled to a college just because of your test scores. First of all you’re competing with other people just as smart as you to a school with like a 5% acceptance rate. Second Asians are overrepresented so they’re just looking for diversity.
 
Would you say UCs have been effective with adhering to no AA or you think they’re using “holistic admissions” as a method to admit more minority students?
UCs are exceptionally non black imo. I think the black student population is like 2-3% at UCLA. At least at Stanford it’s like 7%. I think for the most part the UCs adhere to it
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender
Would you say UCs have been effective with adhering to no AA or you think they’re using “holistic admissions” as a method to admit more minority students?
they're discriminating against asians in favor of blacks and hispanics, ie whichever ethnicities are underperforming and thus require a reduction in admission standards. asians must achieve higher standards than even whites.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender
You’re not entitled to a college just because of your test scores. First of all you’re competing with other people just as smart as you to a school with like a 5% acceptance rate. Second Asians are overrepresented so they’re just looking for diversity.
Jamal who made it out of the hood and graduated valedictorian is more interesting that Asian bot #782 @looksmaxxed
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: nope, PrinceLuenLeoncur and TeenAscender
You’re not entitled to a college just because of your test scores. First of all you’re competing with other people just as smart as you to a school with like a 5% acceptance rate. Second Asians are overrepresented so they’re just looking for diversity.
If an Asian student has better academic stats and is deemed to have higher impact ECs or whatever, why shouldn’t the Asian student have the inherent right to be admitted over a minority student
 
You’re not entitled to a college just because of your test scores. First of all you’re competing with other people just as smart as you to a school with like a 5% acceptance rate. Second Asians are overrepresented so they’re just looking for diversity.

There are literally 100k kids every year who graduate with 4.0s and top 2% SAT scores. The SAT score alone past a certain number is not indicative of performance in college. It’s impossible to just judge based on test scores and gpa in a country big as America
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
If an Asian student has better academic stats and is deemed to have higher impact ECs or whatever, why shouldn’t the Asian student have the inherent right to be admitted over a minority student
Not how affirmative action works. If two people have the same results but one is more interesting, they’ll take the interesting one
 
  • +1
Reactions: nope, PrinceLuenLeoncur and whiteissuperior
If an Asian student has better academic stats and is deemed to have higher impact ECs or whatever, why shouldn’t the Asian student have the inherent right to be admitted over a minority student
Affirmative action does not mean they’re accepting less qualified blacks over more qualified Asians

Also half this shit is opportunity. Ling at Princeton high school has the opportunity to intern at SpaceX in high school. Jamal didn’t. So why should Jamal be punished
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur and Deleted member 9003
Affirmative action does not mean they’re accepting less qualified blacks over more qualified Asians

Also half this shit is opportunity. Ling at Princeton high school has the opportunity to intern at SpaceX in high school. Jamal didn’t. So why should Jamal be punished
yeah affirmative action directly applies laterally towards different races in the same economic bracket. That’s not fair
 
California and other blue states banned race based affirmative action a long time ago cuz their states have more Asians. It’s actually Asians

Ppl ignore the fact that 40% of white kods at Harvard are legacy or faculty’s kids and just blame it on black ppl

But I believe the Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action as a practice, meaning all other schools must follow suit
This
 
You’re not entitled to a college just because of your test scores. First of all you’re competing with other people just as smart as you to a school with like a 5% acceptance rate. Second Asians are overrepresented so they’re just looking for diversity.
test scores reflect academic ability and intellectual capacity, of course they should take precedence over meaningless metrics like diversity. those with greater academic aptitude will be more able and inclined to capitalize on their education and make meaningful contributions in the world. the fact that other admissions issues exists doesn't justify affirmative action
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender
Jamal who made it out of the hood and graduated valedictorian is more interesting that Asian bot #782 @looksmaxxed
Should be based on economic class then not race
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, Deleted member 9003 and TeenAscender
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23218
idk where i stand with affrimative action tbh. its fucked when smart people with bad environment dont get opportunities but its also fucked when spaces get taken from those who performed better and given to those who perfromed worse
 
test scores reflect academic ability and intellectual capacity, of course they should take precedence over meaningless metrics like diversity. those with greater academic aptitude will be more able and inclined to capitalize on their education and make meaningful contributions in the world. the fact that other admissions issues exists doesn't justify affirmative action
You need good test scores to get into ivy leagues in the first place buddy. Why do you guys act like just by being black you get a full ride to Harvard :lul: @whiteissuperior
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteissuperior
It's honestly a complex situation, but the Republicans have possibly won that situation (non admitted students can technically save money with the rejection and are clearly bound for good), also, note that they managed to say that the military related institutions can continue on with AA, think about that for a second. So yeah, a win for Republicans right now. I'm not a Republican, btw.
 
test scores reflect academic ability and intellectual capacity, of course they should take precedence over meaningless metrics like diversity. those with greater academic aptitude will be more able and inclined to capitalize on their education and make meaningful contributions in the world. the fact that other admissions issues exists doesn't justify affirmative action
That is true. But not in the way you think. “Oh ne made a 1570 but she made a 1580 let’s let her in” makes no sense bc at that level the 1 question difference actually has been shown to have no impact on students college performance

If colleges were accepting C students who were black but A students who are Asian everyone would be against that but that’s obviously not what’s happening with affirmative action
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
You need good test scores to get into ivy leagues in the first place buddy. Why do you guys act like just by being black you get a full ride to Harvard :lul: @whiteissuperior
One major issue, as I know west point and harvard students, they were the most well-rounded people I have met, literal robots, peak efficient human, looks to match. But then you get robots who studymaxx all day for a 4.0+ and do nothing else and expect to coast into a school that prioritizes legacy, culture, and education.

But yeah, Asians were being screwed over, just, not to the degree that some made it out to be. There is a better way to navigate that, honestly, race has to be considered, you can't just draw on income lines, culture still matters there, generational wealth still matters.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile, PrinceLuenLeoncur, theRiderEffect and 2 others
Affirmative action does not mean they’re accepting less qualified blacks over more qualified Asians

Also half this shit is opportunity. Ling at Princeton high school has the opportunity to intern at SpaceX in high school. Jamal didn’t. So why should Jamal be punished
except the spot isnt taken by jamal but rather by ibrahim from nigeria. you would know more than me since you actually went to a top college so correct me but most successful black people i see on linkedin have african last names

make no mistake. the root of this issue is the disparity between asian and african academic capabilities but nobody wants to admit it because your average asians cant dunk a ball jumping 2 feet in the air

personally i think nature should take its course but there will never be a fix for legacy admissions because jewish people benefit massively from it and placing themselves as white
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender
Ppl ignore the fact that 40% of white kods at Harvard are legacy or faculty’s kids and just blame it on black ppl
Funniest shit is when chad gets into college on a 3.0 gpa with a academic scholarship and fucks all the girls on campus

I saw a 6’3 rugby player on hinge who goes to Harvard. You know he’s cucking all the stemcels.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, whiteissuperior and TeenAscender
except the spot isnt taken by jamal but rather by ibrahim from nigeria. you would know more than me since you actually went to a top college so correct me but most successful black people i see on linkedin have african last names

make no mistake. the root of this issue is the disparity between asian and african academic capabilities but nobody wants to admit it because your average asians cant dunk a ball jumping 2 feet in the air

personally i think nature should take its course but there will never be a fix for legacy admissions because jewish people benefit massively from it and placing themselves as white
True except actual Africans perform just as well as Asians in college and university so clearly it’s not just race but you’re mostly right

Never met so many Africans before college
 
  • +1
Reactions: theRiderEffect
Funniest shit is when chad gets into college on a 3.0 gpa with a academic scholarship and fucks all the girls on campus

I saw a 6’3 rugby player on hinge who goes to Harvard. You know he’s cucking all the stemcels.
Being a recruited athlete is truly everything. Put your children on peds during highschool
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
Funniest shit is when chad gets into college on a 3.0 gpa with a academic scholarship and fucks all the girls on campus

I saw a 6’3 rugby player on hinge who goes to Harvard. You know he’s cucking all the stemcels.
depends on the college mine has lots of bussiness chads
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003 and TeenAscender
Funniest shit is when chad gets into college on a 3.0 gpa with a academic scholarship and fucks all the girls on campus

I saw a 6’3 rugby player on hinge who goes to Harvard. You know he’s cucking all the stemcels.
People doing bussiness look much better and are more nt than those in liberal arts or stem stuff at my college night and day difference they are even taller
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9003
People doing bussiness look much better and are more nt than those in liberal arts or stem stuff at my college night and day difference they are even taller
business is where all the traits related to mogging matter: College prestige, looks, NT, etc
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 23218
business is where all the traits related to mogging matter: College prestige, looks, NT, etc
Yup. Also liturall6 everyone in Ib is like 6’+ lol I need lifts to be above average in these settings
 
  • +1
Reactions: TeenAscender

Similar threads

Beanermaxxer
Replies
6
Views
101
Beanermaxxer
Beanermaxxer
Bitterschön
Replies
27
Views
402
Toad
Toad
Chadmog
Replies
1
Views
33
ChadGPT
ChadGPT
Changmentum
Replies
6
Views
109
R@m@
R@m@
True truecel
Replies
5
Views
93
True truecel
True truecel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top