Thoughts on the morality of “lolis”

[newgen/cel]

Curious what the incel forum lurkers have to say about the idea of a sexualised child body but only in the 2d form

 

[moongazer]

Curious what the incel forum lurkers have to say about the idea of a sexualised child body but only in the 2d form

They cute

 

[newgen/cel]

They cute

IRL lolis are peak, morally grey but absolutely legal

 

[Orka]

Curious what the incel forum lurkers have to say about the idea of a sexualised child body but only in the 2d form

10/10 times the people who enjoy it turn out to enjoy the body of real children

Attraction is environmental, if you set an environment where people are fucking kids, you'll want to fuck kids

 

[moongazer]

IRL lolis are peak, morally grey but absolutely legal

I have no morals….

 

[YouDoYou]

Pure degeneration.

I'd rather be femdommed by a MILF than consider a loli

 

[newgen/cel]

I have no morals….

nobody does, we have feelings which we larp as morals but they do not truly exist

 

[moongazer]

nobody does, we have feelings which we larp as morals but they do not truly exist

Manmade morals

 

[newgen/cel]

Pure degeneration.

I'd rather be femdommed by a MILF than consider a loli

View attachment 4477149

acting more effeminate I would argue is more degenerate,

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

if you are mentally ill and find the prepubescant body attractive you don't have a choice but to watch hentai

 

[newgen/cel]

10/10 times the people who enjoy it turn out to enjoy the body of real children

Attraction is environmental, if you set an environment where people are fucking kids, you'll want to fuck kids

Completely true

 

[CaZaDor]

Well it clearly is some form of pedophilia.
The argument usually is that since it's not a drawing and not real it's not pedophilia, but that's stupid. Say a man jerked of to a cartoon of a super hairy buff guy with a large dick, would that be straight because it's only a drawing? Of course not,stupid argument.

But overall I don't care, better Loli than real children

 

[YouDoYou]

acting more effeminate I would argue is more degenerate,

Just comparing something that's as many tiers above your realm as possible.

Normal Busty >> Femdom >>> Foot fetish >>> Loli

 

[newgen/cel]

if you are mentally ill and find the prepubescant body attractive you don't have a choice but to watch hentai

That is true yes, it does not make biological sense to be a pedophile other than you have something literally wrong with you, as do faggots and trannies

 

[Klasik616]

10/10 times the people who enjoy it turn out to enjoy the body of real children

Attraction is environmental, if you set an environment where people are fucking kids, you'll want to fuck kids

Can you make an environment where girls fuck LTNs?

 

[newgen/cel]

Well it clearly is some form of pedophilia.
The argument usually is that since it's not a drawing and not real it's not pedophilia, but that's stupid. Say a man jerked of to a cartoon of a super hairy buff guy with a large dick, would that be straight because it's only a drawing? Of course not,stupid argument.

But overall I don't care, better Loli than real children

Great point, it’s definitely in the room of pedophelia and anyone denying it is lying,

 

[newgen/cel]

Can you make an environment where girls fuck LTNs?

we wish we could

 

[Klasik616]

Short foids are hot

 

[newgen/cel]

Short foids are hot

objectively true, anyone who disagrees is a faggot

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

Short foids are hot

short foids are friends I'm not sacrificing my kid for some tighter pussy

 

[YHWH's ghost]

Can you make an environment where girls fuck LTNs?

Yes. That would be a lot healthier than all of this looksmaxxing shit

 

[newgen/cel]

short foids are friends I'm not sacrificing my kid for some tighter pussy

retards when they realise contraceptives exist

 

[Klasik616]

short foids are friends I'm not sacrificing my kid for some tighter pussy

No man is not their pussy, short foids who are slim and have muscles are the most fuckable.

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

short foids are friends I'm not sacrificing my kid for some tighter pussy

top 10 acts of altruism and self sacrifise

 

[oxyyy]

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

No man is not their pussy, short foids who are slim and have muscles are the most fuckable.

you gotta show me an example when you throw "I like chicks with muscles around" sounds gay

5,7ft is ideal for me

 

[newgen/cel]

I

you gotta show me an example when you throw "I like chicks with muscles around" sounds gay

5,7ft is ideal for me

for marriage id agree, for protected sex 5,5 or 5,4 is ideal

 

[GonorrhoeaGobbler]

I

for marriage id agree, for protected sex 5,5 or 5,4 is ideal

for protected sex idgaf I'd fuck most tings


rep my shit brah

 

[newgen/cel]

for protected sex idgaf I'd fuck most tings


rep my shit brah

True dat

 

[Tenres]

Well it clearly is some form of pedophilia.
The argument usually is that since it's not a drawing and not real it's not pedophilia, but that's stupid. Say a man jerked of to a cartoon of a super hairy buff guy with a large dick, would that be straight because it's only a drawing? Of course not,stupid argument.

But overall I don't care, better Loli than real children

10/10 times the people who enjoy it turn out to enjoy the body of real children

Attraction is environmental, if you set an environment where people are fucking kids, you'll want to fuck kids

^ These are correct

In the case where someone is getting sexual pleasure from depictions of prepubertal girls, then they are attracted to either physically or mentally the idea of prepubertal girls, in which case they are a pedophile. Pedophilia itself, however, is just a psychological complex. If they are pedophiles and we accept that having sex or otherwise sexually engaging with prepubertal girls is bad, then the question must be if by engaging on their desires using fictional depictions increases their chance of doing so in real life. A modern study on this would obviously be unethical, so we would just have to use what we know in modern psychology. What we know is that acting on a desire makes it stronger as it feeds the feedback loop of urge --> relief of urge, and the stronger the urge the more likely you acting out these desires with a real person increases.

 

[Orka]

^ These are correct

In the case where someone is getting sexual pleasure from depictions of prepubertal girls, then they are attracted to either physically or mentally the idea of prepubertal girls, in which case they are a pedophile. Pedophilia itself, however, is just a psychological complex. If they are pedophiles and we accept that having sex or otherwise sexually engaging with prepubertal girls is bad, then the question must be if by engaging on their desires using fictional depictions increases their chance of doing so in real life. A modern study on this would obviously be unethical, so we would just have to use what we know in modern psychology. What we know is that acting on a desire makes it stronger as it feeds the feedback loop of urge --> relief of urge, and the stronger the urge the more likely you acting out these desires with a real person increases.

Well said

 

[newgen/cel]

^ These are correct

In the case where someone is getting sexual pleasure from depictions of prepubertal girls, then they are attracted to either physically or mentally the idea of prepubertal girls, in which case they are a pedophile. Pedophilia itself, however, is just a psychological complex. If they are pedophiles and we accept that having sex or otherwise sexually engaging with prepubertal girls is bad, then the question must be if by engaging on their desires using fictional depictions increases their chance of doing so in real life. A modern study on this would obviously be unethical, so we would just have to use what we know in modern psychology. What we know is that acting on a desire makes it stronger as it feeds the feedback loop of urge --> relief of urge, and the stronger the urge the more likely you acting out these desires with a real person increases.

So in your case morally speaking due to the likelihood of the loli porn contributing to a prepubescent body fetish could result in the possible rape of a minor, and obviously rape is generally bad (not morally because morals are nonexistent) and as such the fetish is generally immoral

 

[Tenres]

So in your case morally speaking due to the likelihood of the loli porn contributing to a prepubescent body fetish could result in the possible rape of a minor, and obviously rape is generally bad (not morally because morals are nonexistent) and as such the fetish is generally immoral

Yeah, I'd say that it would generally lead to a higher likelihood of actual child rape / molestation. Based on everything we know. People who watch straight porn don't lower their libido and try to fuck women less (generally) and a gay man isn't going to stop wanting to fuck men because they watched gay porn. I'd say that's bad to me, as in I would prefer to live in a society where children aren't raped.

 

[newgen/cel]

Then again I’ve heard porn does actually lower rape rates. But you could never get it accurate with children as all of it is rape due to their inability to consent, but I’ll research base rape rates before and after porn was easily accessible

 

[LettersfromAgartha]

Curious what the incel forum lurkers have to say about the idea of a sexualised child body but only in the 2d form

cant goon to loli. i like more mature bodies.