Thoughts on "Vaginocapitalism"?

D

Deleted member 14693

Emerald
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Posts
36,574
Reputation
65,133

Vaginocapitalism'[edit]​

Undersky takes pride in a theory he claims to have come up with called 'Vaginocapitalism'. According to this theory, women constitute an exploiter class that exchanges temporary access to their sexual assets in exchange for the fruit of men's labour. He claims that inhibited 'access to the vagina' is now the main driver of unnecessary accumulation and exploitation in modern industrialized societies.[28]

The intrinsic female sexual assets of the women also provide them, in Undersky's view, much greater social mobility than men, a phenomenon he calls 'vaginal lift'. He cites cases of women marrying or engaging in sexual intercourse with ultra-wealthy men, such as Vladimir Putin's alleged mistress Svetlana Krivonogikh,[29] and making vast fortunes from this kind of sexual exchange as an example of this.

While in Undersky's view, women constitute a privileged and heavily coddled caste in modern society, men are portrayed as an exploited class who have to engage in heavy study, tireless back-breaking labour, and be willing to share the fruits of their economic and social success in order to be granted the promise of sex by women. Undersky emphasizes that this is only a facile and easily revoked promise in many cases.

The core aspect of Undersky's analysis of the sexual marketplace as being comprised of an exchange system with women as sellers and men as buyers was anticipated by an earlier Marxist book entitled Women As Sex Vendors. However, Undersky further advances this line of argumentation by portraying women as asset-holding capitalists rather than essentially passive victims of the capitalist system of exchange and production, like the aforementioned book's female author— which is in line with the typical orthodox Marxist treatment of social phenomena that involves the exchange of sex for resources.

"The vagina is the private property of women [...] its owner (is) a capitalist, in this case - vaginocapitalist. Access to the vagina is the key to exploitation in the modern world".


Source: https://en.*************/Alex_Podnebesny

Sounds accurate tbh @MoggerGaston
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 15484, HOLYFUARK, n0rthface and 8 others
Well it’s true jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend, Deleted member 17578, thecel and 2 others
say that out loud
 
  • JFL
Reactions: thecel and Deleted member 14693

Vaginocapitalism'[edit]​

Undersky takes pride in a theory he claims to have come up with called 'Vaginocapitalism'. According to this theory, women constitute an exploiter class that exchanges temporary access to their sexual assets in exchange for the fruit of men's labour. He claims that inhibited 'access to the vagina' is now the main driver of unnecessary accumulation and exploitation in modern industrialized societies.[28]

The intrinsic female sexual assets of the women also provide them, in Undersky's view, much greater social mobility than men, a phenomenon he calls 'vaginal lift'. He cites cases of women marrying or engaging in sexual intercourse with ultra-wealthy men, such as Vladimir Putin's alleged mistress Svetlana Krivonogikh,[29] and making vast fortunes from this kind of sexual exchange as an example of this.

While in Undersky's view, women constitute a privileged and heavily coddled caste in modern society, men are portrayed as an exploited class who have to engage in heavy study, tireless back-breaking labour, and be willing to share the fruits of their economic and social success in order to be granted the promise of sex by women. Undersky emphasizes that this is only a facile and easily revoked promise in many cases.

The core aspect of Undersky's analysis of the sexual marketplace as being comprised of an exchange system with women as sellers and men as buyers was anticipated by an earlier Marxist book entitled Women As Sex Vendors. However, Undersky further advances this line of argumentation by portraying women as asset-holding capitalists rather than essentially passive victims of the capitalist system of exchange and production, like the aforementioned book's female author— which is in line with the typical orthodox Marxist treatment of social phenomena that involves the exchange of sex for resources.




Source: https://en.*************/Alex_Podnebesny

Sounds accurate tbh @MoggerGaston


The sexual proletariat needs to rise up to strike down the sexual bourgeois



Picture1
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15484, Deleted member 7027, thereallegend and 2 others
Women just give their vaginas to chads for free

Normies can’t even betabux in the west anymore it’s iver
 
  • +1
Reactions: gribsufer1, thereallegend and Deleted member 17578
nah they have to oofy doofy their way into a relationship where they'll be cucked
Leaves people like me stuck in looks purgatory- too masc/proud to oofy doofy max, too sub chad to slay hot girls
 
  • +1
Reactions: thereallegend and Deleted member 21620
a9c.png


this already happens but this isn't new. I'm sure you can find scholars proposing similar theories for hundreds of years lol. Esther Vilar talks about the exact same thing in her book "The Manipulated Man".
 
@MoggerGaston now THIS is something we can agree on
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14693
sounds like subchad cope
 
265D78E6 837E 47B0 9898 C4D38653BBF2
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 15484, Deleted member 7027 and Deleted member 14693
Sexual communism is gigabased
 

Similar threads

fortnitelover671
Replies
0
Views
27
fortnitelover671
fortnitelover671
NarrowBoneMarrow
Replies
14
Views
61
iblamethatmtb
iblamethatmtb
pleasevanity
Replies
84
Views
433
IStalkMyself
IStalkMyself
dipenhydramine
Replies
17
Views
97
sphenoidnr
sphenoidnr
swedchud
Replies
38
Views
110
sillybilly
sillybilly

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top