Tinder through the girls eyes Utah

[Reckless Turtle]

 

[Deleted member 16530]

I’ve seen so many experiments these last couple of years it doesn’t faze me

 

[Deleted member 17461]

I feel bad for calvan, good eye area

 

[Reckless Turtle]

 

[.👽.]

bruh crazy how most guys on her TikTok were average/ugly. HTN is enough for tinder

 

[gamma]

What's surprising about this

 

[Reckless Turtle]

I guess I've reposted this...

 

[Reckless Turtle]

What's surprising about this

Nothing. As you've always said, BBCs and mulattos are winning.

@looksmaxxer234

 

[Reckless Turtle]

 

[cvzvvc]

I read the book Date-o-nomics a few months back and one of the disturbing things was the author's main contentions that in populations where women perceived men to be more abundant than women, these same women were more concerned with attractiveness in facial symmetry of the men and consequently orders of magnitude more selective in who they fucked/dated.

He used the Salt Lake City, Utah as an area before the rise of dating apps to show that it had one of the most frequented/lucrative plastic surgery and body modification industries in all of the United States (even more than LA), only because it was a buyer's market for the men due to the gender ratios being massively in their favor. Thanks to online dating, however, women can now select from all around the world and are not limited any one geographic area for potential sexual partners. Meaning, women are now more selective than ever for facial symmetry.

The author would love your video because it basically wholesale certifies his argument beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

I read the book Date-o-nomics a few months back and one of the disturbing things was the author's main contentions that in populations where women perceived men to be more abundant than women, these same women were more concerned with attractiveness in facial symmetry of the men and consequently orders of magnitude more selective in who they fucked/dated.

He used the Salt Lake City, Utah as an area before the rise of dating apps to show that it had one of the most frequented/lucrative plastic surgery and body modification industries in all of the United States (even more than LA), only because it was a buyer's market for the men due to the gender ratios being massively in their favor. Thanks to online dating, however, women can now select from all around the world and are not limited any one geographic area for potential sexual partners. Meaning, women are now more selective than ever for facial symmetry.

The author would love your video because it basically wholesale certifies his argument beyond a reasonable doubt.

It’s not you, it’s the math.
That’s the message economics writer Jon Birger has for college-educated single woman in big cities who would rather be paired off.

Birger’s new book, “Date-onomics,” blames gender imbalances on college campuses and in urban areas for sapping men’s interest in commitment and creating a surplus of single women. “The college and post-college hookup culture, the decline in marriage rates among college-educated women, and the dearth of marriage-material men willing to commit, are all byproducts of lopsided gender ratios and a massive undersupply of college-educated men,” Birger writes.
Overall, “Date-onomics” is a depressing, patronizing book to read as a single woman. Nearly 200 pages delving into the numbers and their effect on supply and demand implies: Have you ever thought about moving? Preferably to San Jose or the New York City suburbs, where there’s a surplus of college-educated single men? Birger is quick to say he’s not telling people what to do: “My goal is simply to make sure people’s choices are informed ones,” he writes. Instead, he merely “suggests” that young men and women choose colleges, careers and cities based on gender ratios. As if that cancels out the married mansplaining.


Rather than scare you with the stats implying that THERE ARE NO GOOD MEN ANYWHERE!!!, here are three nuggets on the more optimistic side of Birger’s equations.
1. Assertive women get the guys.
“Men want to be wanted,” Birger writes, “and in a lopsided dating market, women who are pursuers are more likely to succeed than those who sit back and wait for Mr. Right to woo them.” The idea that men enjoy the chase “may well be a myth,” he adds.

I’ve long supported women making the first move. It’s a key part of my feminist dating strategy, and there are even new dating apps that require it. But for anyone who’s still not convinced, here’s an economics writer endorsing the tactic as well.

2. Asian American women aren’t hurt by the “man deficit.”
Since 67 percent of Asian American women ages 30 to 34 have a college degree, versus 38 percent for all women, Birger assumed that Asian American women “would be far more affected by the man deficit than women from other racial or ethnic groups.” Instead, he found that they don’t have trouble finding a mate.

Eighty-eight percent of Asian American women (ages 30 to 34) are married or have been married, the book notes, compared to 77 percent for white women, 73 percent for Hispanic women and 46 percent for black women. The reason, according to Birger, who cites OkCupid data and other psychological experiments, is that men of all races find Asian women to be the most attractive.

3. More mixed-collar marriages could reduce the man deficit.
Birger predicts that, in the future, more professional women will marry working-class men. These pairings are already common among African Americans; he cites a 2010 Pew Research Center report finding that 33 percent of African American women were married to men with less education, compared with 28 percent of all American women.
“Some college-educated women might balk at the idea of marrying a working-class man,” Birger writes. “However, others could view a mixed-collar marriage as a solution to a modern dilemma — the career woman who could really use a partner with more time to help with homework or attend Little League games.”
A stronger economy with more job security and higher earnings for men without college diplomas, Birger notes, “would go a long way to making those matches more viable.”

 

[Chadeep]

@OOGABOOGA Time to shine in Utah with @Biggdink

 

[cvzvvc]

He wrote a follow-up because his original book and several of the arguments were completely invalidated by the rise of online dating, although the scientific studies regarding facial symmetry and population perception are still completely valid. For what it's worth, the original book got so blue pilled that I finished it and threw it in the trash.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

@OOGABOOGA Time to shine in Utah with @Biggdink

"If Tyrones were nuked, hypergamy wouldn't exist." - @Biggdink

 

[Chadeep]

"If Tyrones were nuked, hypergamy wouldn't exist." - @Biggdink

He said that about Indians tho. Not a single curry slayer in that experiment.

 

[Deleted member 7580]

Hmmm she swiped on medium uglies instead of chadlites

First guy she swiped on is normie af

 

[Enfant terrible]

based

 

[Enfant terrible]

also this is an extreme by the way and not really the norm

 

[gamma]

Nothing. As you've always said, BBCs and mulattos are winning.

@looksmaxxer234

1 mulatto vs 4-5 white guys swiped
Pathetic cope

 

[Reckless Turtle]

1 mulatto vs 4-5 white guys swiped
Pathetic cope

She would reject you though.

 

[gamma]

She would reject you though.

 

[Hueless]

Nothing. As you've always said, BBCs and mulattos are winning.

@looksmaxxer234

6'3

It’s not you, it’s the math.
That’s the message economics writer Jon Birger has for college-educated single woman in big cities who would rather be paired off.

Birger’s new book, “Date-onomics,” blames gender imbalances on college campuses and in urban areas for sapping men’s interest in commitment and creating a surplus of single women. “The college and post-college hookup culture, the decline in marriage rates among college-educated women, and the dearth of marriage-material men willing to commit, are all byproducts of lopsided gender ratios and a massive undersupply of college-educated men,” Birger writes.
Overall, “Date-onomics” is a depressing, patronizing book to read as a single woman. Nearly 200 pages delving into the numbers and their effect on supply and demand implies: Have you ever thought about moving? Preferably to San Jose or the New York City suburbs, where there’s a surplus of college-educated single men? Birger is quick to say he’s not telling people what to do: “My goal is simply to make sure people’s choices are informed ones,” he writes. Instead, he merely “suggests” that young men and women choose colleges, careers and cities based on gender ratios. As if that cancels out the married mansplaining.


Rather than scare you with the stats implying that THERE ARE NO GOOD MEN ANYWHERE!!!, here are three nuggets on the more optimistic side of Birger’s equations.
1. Assertive women get the guys.
“Men want to be wanted,” Birger writes, “and in a lopsided dating market, women who are pursuers are more likely to succeed than those who sit back and wait for Mr. Right to woo them.” The idea that men enjoy the chase “may well be a myth,” he adds.

I’ve long supported women making the first move. It’s a key part of my feminist dating strategy, and there are even new dating apps that require it. But for anyone who’s still not convinced, here’s an economics writer endorsing the tactic as well.

2. Asian American women aren’t hurt by the “man deficit.”
Since 67 percent of Asian American women ages 30 to 34 have a college degree, versus 38 percent for all women, Birger assumed that Asian American women “would be far more affected by the man deficit than women from other racial or ethnic groups.” Instead, he found that they don’t have trouble finding a mate.

Eighty-eight percent of Asian American women (ages 30 to 34) are married or have been married, the book notes, compared to 77 percent for white women, 73 percent for Hispanic women and 46 percent for black women. The reason, according to Birger, who cites OkCupid data and other psychological experiments, is that men of all races find Asian women to be the most attractive.

3. More mixed-collar marriages could reduce the man deficit.
Birger predicts that, in the future, more professional women will marry working-class men. These pairings are already common among African Americans; he cites a 2010 Pew Research Center report finding that 33 percent of African American women were married to men with less education, compared with 28 percent of all American women.
“Some college-educated women might balk at the idea of marrying a working-class man,” Birger writes. “However, others could view a mixed-collar marriage as a solution to a modern dilemma — the career woman who could really use a partner with more time to help with homework or attend Little League games.”
A stronger economy with more job security and higher earnings for men without college diplomas, Birger notes, “would go a long way to making those matches more viable.”

Dnr

 

[Reckless Turtle]

I’ve seen so many experiments these last couple of years it doesn’t faze me

Even on this forum, some guys are unironically talking about dating apps (larping too) as if they're effective for having casual sex.

 

[Deleted member 7580]

Even on this forum, some guys are unironically talking about dating apps (larping too) as if they're effective for having casual sex.

Seems like they only work for medium uglies like the guys she swiped on

also shes fat no wonder she swiped no on chadlites

 

[Reckless Turtle]

also shes fat no wonder she swiped no on chadlites

The plump snow bunnies prefer 6'3 Tyrones. Also, all of the guys she swiped on would be top 5% on this forum (some of them top 1%).

 

[Deleted member 7580]

The plump snow bunnies prefer 6'3 Tyrones. Also, all of the guys she swiped on would be top 5% on this forum (some of them top 1%).

She’s white ??
Also no those guys weren’t top 5 %

edit: yea maybe top 5 % on this forum bcz most guys here are subhuman

 

[Reckless Turtle]

She’s white ??
Also no those guys weren’t top 5 %

edit: yea maybe top 5 % on this forum bcz most guys here are subhuman

Never mind on Adam; he was legitimately medium ugly. But let's not ignore the hoards of medium uglies she swiped left on.

 

[Xangsane]

That's what the bitch gets for only going with chad when she's mtb

 

[Reckless Turtle]

That's what the bitch gets for only going with chad when she's mtb

New Tinder saga character?

 

[Xangsane]

New Tinder saga character?

Maybe.

 

[Deleted member 15067]

 

[Reckless Turtle]

She’s white ??
Also no those guys weren’t top 5 %

edit: yea maybe top 5 % on this forum bcz most guys here are subhuman

That's what the bitch gets for only going with chad when she's mtb

Medium uglies are out here being emotional providers for whales and breaking their hearts.

 

[Xangsane]

Medium uglies are out here being emotional providers for whales and breaking their hearts.

Bitch can't even secure a mtn
Over

 

[Reckless Turtle]

also this is an extreme by the way and not really the norm

Gonna call cope on this.

 

[Enfant terrible]

Gonna call cope on this.

maybe its a us tinder think
german tinder different you get way more matches as average soft maxxed guy,

 

[Reckless Turtle]

maybe its a us tinder think
german tinder different you get way more matches as average soft maxxed guy,

I can actually agree with that despite having no explanation (maybe because German cities are smaller/less spread out). However, I doubt the potentially higher match rate actually leads to increased casual sex.

 

[Deleted member 4016]

"If Tyrones were nuked, hypergamy wouldn't exist." - @Biggdink

“He cute”

yeah those 10 pixels that make up his face in that photo… you can definitely tell

 

[Enfant terrible]

I can actually agree with that despite having no explanation (maybe because German cities are smaller/less spread out). However, I doubt the potentially higher match rate actually leads to increased casual sex.

Maybe its true that american women are just very entitled i dont know i was never there.

 

[TITUS]

SO OVER.

 

[Titbot]

Jfl at rejecting Calvin. He mogs her to the astral realm

 

[apocalypse]

mirin how fast she reads all the bios

 

[MaxillaMaxing]

can anyone posts more comments from her tiktok

 

[Deleted member 15778]

He wrote a follow-up because his original book and several of the arguments were completely invalidated by the rise of online dating, although the scientific studies regarding facial symmetry and population perception are still completely valid. For what it's worth, the original book got so blue pilled that I finished it and threw it in the trash.

From what people wrote about it in this thread is seems like the most absolutely retarded horseshit I have ever heard. If you don't understand people, you can look at data and draw the completely wrong conclusions, which seems like the case for that book.

 

[Pendejo]

1 mulatto vs 4-5 white guys swiped
Pathetic cope

I mean, the amount of white guys was far greater, so what you said is as meaningless as what he said (it was a joke anyway, idk how you took that seriously lol).

 

[slavmaxxer]

Most of the guys on this video don't look very good. They aren't even leanmaxxed. As a Polack I would have better results than them lol.

 

[Beetlejuice]

Jfl

 

[cvzvvc]

From what people wrote about it in this thread is seems like the most absolutely retarded horseshit I have ever heard. If you don't understand people, you can look at data and draw the completely wrong conclusions, which seems like the case for that book.

The book got progressively worse and worse to the point where the it is now at the bottom of a landfill somewhere and not in my bookshelf.

It was like the author hit upon some ugly truths about why women generally can't keep sexually desirable men around, realized how politically incorrect these truths were, and then realized he'd be unable to sell a book to any romantically/sexually frustrated audience of women without morphing his conclusions, and then proceeded to base the rest of the book around a bunch of half-cocked conclusions that would prevent him from getting cancelled or yelled at. This also created an opportunistic vacuum which he later filled with a second book that I haven't read.

It's funny because the book started off so blackpilled with surgery/facial symmetry/etc. and then went full bluepill by the end. It was a slog to get through the last 50 pages.

 

[Deleted member 2381]

Even on this forum, some guys are unironically talking about dating apps (larping too) as if they're effective for having casual sex.

They are for Chadlites and above

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Chadlites

Not good enough it seems.