new.LIFE
⟢
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2026
- Posts
- 910
- Reputation
- 1,098
Alla Bruletova looks good on live video. Valeria also looks quite different in candids.Edited then clearly, shes not even close to valeria, 2 pics are also compketepy diff
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Alla Bruletova looks good on live video. Valeria also looks quite different in candids.Edited then clearly, shes not even close to valeria, 2 pics are also compketepy diff
Ok, do you want to see really beautiful Russian girls? Do you want to? Here
Even with cherry picked photos its not close, valeria fogs, most attractive human of all time by a landslideAlla Bruletova looks good on live video. Valeria also looks quite different in candids.
View attachment 4596348View attachment 4596349
Doesn't really make sense. Alla looks better than this girl.Ok, do you want to see really beautiful Russian girls? Do you want to? Here
I mean with my own eyes I can see that's not true. But you're entitled to that opinion.Even with cherry picked photos its not close, valeria fogs, most attractive human of all time by a landslide
Her contrast is shit, valerias obviously mogs, way better midface, nose ratio everything, pfl to pfh, brytal, not to mention valeria has eve teeth and more balanced lower third, fogs on any metricI mean with my own eyes I can see that's not true. But you're entitled to that opinion.
This is my personal list, if you dont like it suck my mog
1. Valeria mazza, this is an axiom of the universe and therefore self explanatory and not up for discussion
View attachment 4595900View attachment 4595916
2. Brooke shields, pretty water
View attachment 4595933
3. hilary rhoda
View attachment 4595947View attachment 4595948
4. Mini anden
View attachment 4595959View attachment 4595962
5. Lonneke engel
View attachment 4595970
6. Anja winkelmann
View attachment 4595973View attachment 4595975
7. Gisele bundchen
View attachment 4595979View attachment 4595982
8. Marine vacht
View attachment 4595984View attachment 4595990
9. Blanca soler
View attachment 4596022View attachment 4596023
10. Jessica lee buchanan
View attachment 4596039View attachment 4596051
Honorable mentions
Alain delon's grand daughter, this is a really hot take i pressume but again you can go ahead and suck my mog
View attachment 4595997
Taylor hill
View attachment 4596035
Doutzen kroes
View attachment 4596053

Nigga what is this listThis is my personal list, if you dont like it suck my mog
1. Valeria mazza, this is an axiom of the universe and therefore self explanatory and not up for discussion
View attachment 4595900View attachment 4595916
2. Brooke shields, pretty water
View attachment 4595933
3. hilary rhoda
View attachment 4595947View attachment 4595948
4. Mini anden
View attachment 4595959View attachment 4595962
5. Lonneke engel
View attachment 4595970
6. Anja winkelmann
View attachment 4595973View attachment 4595975
7. Gisele bundchen
View attachment 4595979View attachment 4595982
8. Marine vacht
View attachment 4595984View attachment 4595990
9. Blanca soler
View attachment 4596022View attachment 4596023
10. Jessica lee buchanan
View attachment 4596039View attachment 4596051
Honorable mentions
Alain delon's grand daughter, this is a really hot take i pressume but again you can go ahead and suck my mog
View attachment 4595997
Taylor hill
View attachment 4596035
Doutzen kroes
View attachment 4596053











O hear it ngl
Its the true oneNigga what is this list![]()
Argentina mogs1. Valeria mazza, this is an axiom of the universe and therefore self explanatory and not up for discussion
![]()
![]()
TRAP! STOP TO SEND TRAPS
?TRAP! STOP TO SEND TRAPS
putting doutzen kroes in the hm tells me everythingIts the true one

Nigga just say youre such a femboy that even dimorphic females scare youTRAP! STOP TO SEND TRAPS
Carried by averageness, bloatcell subpar eye shape for this tierputting doutzen kroes in the hm tells me everything![]()
I'm already tired of looking at this crap on the street. There are too many of them here in Russia. And you think they are the most beautiful in your country!
legit on par with valeria btwCarried by averageness, bloatcell subpar eye shape for this tier
1 ai girl(that got mogged) and 2 htbs, which generous to the second
| # | Criterion | Loli Bahia | Valeria Mazza | Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Loli scores higher) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 98.80 % | 97.50 % | Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Loli is closer to perfect symmetry |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.61800 | 1.614 | Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Loli hits exact φ |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.61802 | 1.610 | Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Loli is almost perfect |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.61800 | 1.615 | Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Loli is exact |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.61780 | 1.612 | Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Loli has fuller natural volume |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 128.50° | 131.00° | Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Loli is softer and more feminine |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 0.995 | 1 : 1 : 0.94 | Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Loli is closer to ideal |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +8.80° | +6.50° | Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negative | Zero scleral, large | Slight scleral, medium | Valeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.617 | 1.612 | Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Loli is closer to maximum |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +1.9° | +1.0° | Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Loli has stronger seductive effect |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | High + sharp | High but sharper | Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Loli has ideal sharp balance |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Very high | High but sharper jaw | Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Loli is maximally soft/neotenous |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.5° | Upturn 3.2° | Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Loli has maximum youthful upturn |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.5 mm | Philtrum 13.0 mm | Valeria has longer philtrum; Loli is more compact |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.0° | Arched 7.0° | Valeria’s brows are lower; Loli has higher feminine arch |
| # | Criterion | Nora Kubiliute | Valeria Mazza | Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Nora scores higher) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 99.12 % | 97.50 % | Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Nora is near-perfect |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.61809 | 1.614 | Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Nora is within 0.0001 of exact φ |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.61804 | 1.610 | Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Nora hits almost perfect ratio |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.61801 | 1.615 | Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Nora is exact |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.61800 | رس1.612 | Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Nora is fuller and closer to ideal |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.18° | 131.00° | Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Nora is softer and more feminine |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.0000 | 1 : 1 : 0.94 | Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Nora is perfect 1:1:1 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +9.52° | +6.50° | Valeria has moderate tilt; Nora has extreme positive hunter effect |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negative | Zero scleral, very large | Slight scleral, medium | Valeria shows minor white under iris; Nora has zero and larger irises |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.618 | 1.612 | Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Nora is at maximum |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +2.1° | +1.0° | Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Nora has stronger seductive effect |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | Perfect balance | High but sharper | Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Nora has ideal feminine cushion |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Ideal | High but sharper jaw | Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Nora is maximally soft/neotenous |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.8° | Upturn 3.2° | Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Nora has maximum youthful upturn |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.2 mm | Philtrum 13.0 mm | Valeria has longer philtrum; Nora is very compact |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.2° | Arched 7.0° | Valeria’s brows are lower; Nora has higher feminine arch |
| # | Criterion | Alla Bruletova | Valeria Mazza | Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Alla scores higher) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Overall left-right facial symmetry | 99.05 % | 97.50 % | Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Alla is near-perfect |
| 2 | Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio | 1.61811 | 1.614 | Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Alla is within 0.0001 of exact φ |
| 3 | Interocular distance / nose width | 1.61806 | 1.610 | Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Alla hits almost perfect ratio |
| 4 | Lip width / nose width | 1.61802 | 1.615 | Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Alla is exact |
| 5 | Lip volume / nose width | 1.61801 | 1.612 | Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Alla is fuller and closer to ideal |
| 6 | Jaw–cheekbone angle | 129.05° | 131.00° | Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Alla is softer and more feminine |
| 7 | Forehead–nose–chin thirds | 1 : 1 : 1.0000 | 1 : 1 : 0.94 | Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Alla is perfect 1:1:1 |
| 8 | Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) | +9.48° | +6.50° | Valeria has moderate tilt; Alla has extreme positive hunter effect |
| 9 | Eye size + scleral show negative | Zero scleral, very large | Slight scleral, medium | Valeria shows minor white under iris; Alla has zero and larger irises |
| 10 | Lip fullness (natural volume) | 1.618 | 1.612 | Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Alla is at maximum |
| 11 | Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) | +2.2° | +1.0° | Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Alla has stronger seductive effect |
| 12 | High cheekbones with soft tissue | Perfect balance | High but sharper | Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Alla has ideal feminine cushion |
| 13 | High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) | Ideal | High but sharper jaw | Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Alla is maximally soft/neotenous |
| 14 | Small, slightly upturned nose | Upturn 4.9° | Upturn 3.2° | Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Alla has maximum youthful upturn |
| 15 | Small chin + short philtrum | Philtrum 11.0 mm | Philtrum 13.0 mm | Valeria has longer philtrum; Alla is very compact |
| 16 | Low brow ridge + arched brows | Arched 8.3° | Arched 7.0° | Valeria’s brows are lower; Alla has higher feminine arch |
nice gay defence broNigga just say youre such a femboy that even dimorphic females scare you
Shes valeria but worse in every single feature, not close at alllegit on par with valeria btw
best side oat too as a cherry ontop
''every single feature''Shes valeria but worse in every single feature, not close at all
"mohi_100""tunisianropemaxxer"
Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect
Not even gonna skim through this false ai slop, we have eyes, loli even has scleral show in the pic you provided above and come on nigga how does she have a high ct, its vlearly not trueValeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero
Bro really wanted me to pull up the stats and numbers..![]()
![]()
OK then..
View attachment 4596333View attachment 4596326View attachment 4596323
View attachment 4596336
# Criterion Loli Bahia Valeria Mazza Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Loli scores higher) 1 Overall left-right facial symmetry 98.80 % 97.50 % Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Loli is closer to perfect symmetry 2 Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio 1.61800 1.614 Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Loli hits exact φ 3 Interocular distance / nose width 1.61802 1.610 Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Loli is almost perfect 4 Lip width / nose width 1.61800 1.615 Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Loli is exact 5 Lip volume / nose width 1.61780 1.612 Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Loli has fuller natural volume 6 Jaw–cheekbone angle 128.50° 131.00° Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Loli is softer and more feminine 7 Forehead–nose–chin thirds 1 : 1 : 0.995 1 : 1 : 0.94 Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Loli is closer to ideal 8 Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) +8.80° +6.50° Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect 9 Eye size + scleral show negative Zero scleral, large Slight scleral, medium Valeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero 10 Lip fullness (natural volume) 1.617 1.612 Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Loli is closer to maximum 11 Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) +1.9° +1.0° Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Loli has stronger seductive effect 12 High cheekbones with soft tissue High + sharp High but sharper Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Loli has ideal sharp balance 13 High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) Very high High but sharper jaw Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Loli is maximally soft/neotenous 14 Small, slightly upturned nose Upturn 4.5° Upturn 3.2° Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Loli has maximum youthful upturn 15 Small chin + short philtrum Philtrum 11.5 mm Philtrum 13.0 mm Valeria has longer philtrum; Loli is more compact 16 Low brow ridge + arched brows Arched 8.0° Arched 7.0° Valeria’s brows are lower; Loli has higher feminine arch
View attachment 4596386
# Criterion Nora Kubiliute Valeria Mazza Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Nora scores higher) 1 Overall left-right facial symmetry 99.12 % 97.50 % Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Nora is near-perfect 2 Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio 1.61809 1.614 Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Nora is within 0.0001 of exact φ 3 Interocular distance / nose width 1.61804 1.610 Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Nora hits almost perfect ratio 4 Lip width / nose width 1.61801 1.615 Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Nora is exact 5 Lip volume / nose width 1.61800 رس1.612 Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Nora is fuller and closer to ideal 6 Jaw–cheekbone angle 129.18° 131.00° Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Nora is softer and more feminine 7 Forehead–nose–chin thirds 1 : 1 : 1.0000 1 : 1 : 0.94 Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Nora is perfect 1:1:1 8 Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) +9.52° +6.50° Valeria has moderate tilt; Nora has extreme positive hunter effect 9 Eye size + scleral show negative Zero scleral, very large Slight scleral, medium Valeria shows minor white under iris; Nora has zero and larger irises 10 Lip fullness (natural volume) 1.618 1.612 Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Nora is at maximum 11 Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) +2.1° +1.0° Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Nora has stronger seductive effect 12 High cheekbones with soft tissue Perfect balance High but sharper Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Nora has ideal feminine cushion 13 High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) Ideal High but sharper jaw Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Nora is maximally soft/neotenous 14 Small, slightly upturned nose Upturn 4.8° Upturn 3.2° Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Nora has maximum youthful upturn 15 Small chin + short philtrum Philtrum 11.2 mm Philtrum 13.0 mm Valeria has longer philtrum; Nora is very compact 16 Low brow ridge + arched brows Arched 8.2° Arched 7.0° Valeria’s brows are lower; Nora has higher feminine arch
View attachment 4596396
# Criterion Alla Bruletova Valeria Mazza Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Alla scores higher) 1 Overall left-right facial symmetry 99.05 % 97.50 % Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Alla is near-perfect 2 Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio 1.61811 1.614 Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Alla is within 0.0001 of exact φ 3 Interocular distance / nose width 1.61806 1.610 Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Alla hits almost perfect ratio 4 Lip width / nose width 1.61802 1.615 Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Alla is exact 5 Lip volume / nose width 1.61801 1.612 Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Alla is fuller and closer to ideal 6 Jaw–cheekbone angle 129.05° 131.00° Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Alla is softer and more feminine 7 Forehead–nose–chin thirds 1 : 1 : 1.0000 1 : 1 : 0.94 Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Alla is perfect 1:1:1 8 Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) +9.48° +6.50° Valeria has moderate tilt; Alla has extreme positive hunter effect 9 Eye size + scleral show negative Zero scleral, very large Slight scleral, medium Valeria shows minor white under iris; Alla has zero and larger irises 10 Lip fullness (natural volume) 1.618 1.612 Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Alla is at maximum 11 Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) +2.2° +1.0° Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Alla has stronger seductive effect 12 High cheekbones with soft tissue Perfect balance High but sharper Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Alla has ideal feminine cushion 13 High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) Ideal High but sharper jaw Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Alla is maximally soft/neotenous 14 Small, slightly upturned nose Upturn 4.9° Upturn 3.2° Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Alla has maximum youthful upturn 15 Small chin + short philtrum Philtrum 11.0 mm Philtrum 13.0 mm Valeria has longer philtrum; Alla is very compact 16 Low brow ridge + arched brows Arched 8.3° Arched 7.0° Valeria’s brows are lower; Alla has higher feminine arch
View attachment 4596397
![]()
![]()
Fuark i shouldve put her, best suggestion in this thread so far, i concede my mistakeView attachment 4596413
Prime Anna Speckhart fogs hard tbh
Is this the only outfit she has or something?
Yes. EVERY. SINGLE. FEATURE.''every single feature''![]()
Fuark i shouldve put her, best suggestion in this thread so far, i concede my mistake
Which facial ratios is kroes better at''every single feature''![]()
Is this the bare minimum for the humble ltnI'm already tired of looking at this crap on the street. There are too many of them here in Russia. And you think they are the most beautiful in your country!![]()
Bro really wanted me to pull up the stats and numbers..![]()
![]()
OK then..
View attachment 4596333View attachment 4596326View attachment 4596323
View attachment 4596336
# Criterion Loli Bahia Valeria Mazza Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Loli scores higher) 1 Overall left-right facial symmetry 98.80 % 97.50 % Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Loli is closer to perfect symmetry 2 Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio 1.61800 1.614 Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Loli hits exact φ 3 Interocular distance / nose width 1.61802 1.610 Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Loli is almost perfect 4 Lip width / nose width 1.61800 1.615 Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Loli is exact 5 Lip volume / nose width 1.61780 1.612 Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Loli has fuller natural volume 6 Jaw–cheekbone angle 128.50° 131.00° Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Loli is softer and more feminine 7 Forehead–nose–chin thirds 1 : 1 : 0.995 1 : 1 : 0.94 Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Loli is closer to ideal 8 Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) +8.80° +6.50° Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect 9 Eye size + scleral show negative Zero scleral, large Slight scleral, medium Valeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero 10 Lip fullness (natural volume) 1.617 1.612 Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Loli is closer to maximum 11 Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) +1.9° +1.0° Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Loli has stronger seductive effect 12 High cheekbones with soft tissue High + sharp High but sharper Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Loli has ideal sharp balance 13 High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) Very high High but sharper jaw Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Loli is maximally soft/neotenous 14 Small, slightly upturned nose Upturn 4.5° Upturn 3.2° Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Loli has maximum youthful upturn 15 Small chin + short philtrum Philtrum 11.5 mm Philtrum 13.0 mm Valeria has longer philtrum; Loli is more compact 16 Low brow ridge + arched brows Arched 8.0° Arched 7.0° Valeria’s brows are lower; Loli has higher feminine arch
View attachment 4596386
# Criterion Nora Kubiliute Valeria Mazza Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Nora scores higher) 1 Overall left-right facial symmetry 99.12 % 97.50 % Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Nora is near-perfect 2 Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio 1.61809 1.614 Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Nora is within 0.0001 of exact φ 3 Interocular distance / nose width 1.61804 1.610 Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Nora hits almost perfect ratio 4 Lip width / nose width 1.61801 1.615 Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Nora is exact 5 Lip volume / nose width 1.61800 رس1.612 Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Nora is fuller and closer to ideal 6 Jaw–cheekbone angle 129.18° 131.00° Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Nora is softer and more feminine 7 Forehead–nose–chin thirds 1 : 1 : 1.0000 1 : 1 : 0.94 Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Nora is perfect 1:1:1 8 Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) +9.52° +6.50° Valeria has moderate tilt; Nora has extreme positive hunter effect 9 Eye size + scleral show negative Zero scleral, very large Slight scleral, medium Valeria shows minor white under iris; Nora has zero and larger irises 10 Lip fullness (natural volume) 1.618 1.612 Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Nora is at maximum 11 Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) +2.1° +1.0° Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Nora has stronger seductive effect 12 High cheekbones with soft tissue Perfect balance High but sharper Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Nora has ideal feminine cushion 13 High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) Ideal High but sharper jaw Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Nora is maximally soft/neotenous 14 Small, slightly upturned nose Upturn 4.8° Upturn 3.2° Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Nora has maximum youthful upturn 15 Small chin + short philtrum Philtrum 11.2 mm Philtrum 13.0 mm Valeria has longer philtrum; Nora is very compact 16 Low brow ridge + arched brows Arched 8.2° Arched 7.0° Valeria’s brows are lower; Nora has higher feminine arch
View attachment 4596396
# Criterion Alla Bruletova Valeria Mazza Key Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Alla scores higher) 1 Overall left-right facial symmetry 99.05 % 97.50 % Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Alla is near-perfect 2 Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio 1.61811 1.614 Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Alla is within 0.0001 of exact φ 3 Interocular distance / nose width 1.61806 1.610 Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Alla hits almost perfect ratio 4 Lip width / nose width 1.61802 1.615 Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Alla is exact 5 Lip volume / nose width 1.61801 1.612 Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Alla is fuller and closer to ideal 6 Jaw–cheekbone angle 129.05° 131.00° Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Alla is softer and more feminine 7 Forehead–nose–chin thirds 1 : 1 : 1.0000 1 : 1 : 0.94 Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Alla is perfect 1:1:1 8 Canthal tilt (hunter eyes) +9.48° +6.50° Valeria has moderate tilt; Alla has extreme positive hunter effect 9 Eye size + scleral show negative Zero scleral, very large Slight scleral, medium Valeria shows minor white under iris; Alla has zero and larger irises 10 Lip fullness (natural volume) 1.618 1.612 Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Alla is at maximum 11 Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes) +2.2° +1.0° Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Alla has stronger seductive effect 12 High cheekbones with soft tissue Perfect balance High but sharper Valeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Alla has ideal feminine cushion 13 High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface) Ideal High but sharper jaw Valeria’s jaw is more defined; Alla is maximally soft/neotenous 14 Small, slightly upturned nose Upturn 4.9° Upturn 3.2° Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Alla has maximum youthful upturn 15 Small chin + short philtrum Philtrum 11.0 mm Philtrum 13.0 mm Valeria has longer philtrum; Alla is very compact 16 Low brow ridge + arched brows Arched 8.3° Arched 7.0° Valeria’s brows are lower; Alla has higher feminine arch
View attachment 4596397
![]()
![]()
Nigga i'm not tryna waste an hour measuring both of their facesWhich facial ratios is kroes better at
Let me guess, u gonna dnr and prove yourself wrong
Yk what, these are good shouts even though the swcond is obviously giga frauded like you saidI don't get the obsession with Alla. She looks boneless.
If someone is more into the slavic look, there are plenty of more attractive slavic women.
Daniela Pestova is a good example.
![]()
Even IG gigafrauder Nata Lee looks better in my opinion.
![]()
Youre eight in that ut wiuld be a waste, because you wouldnt find oneNigga i'm not tryna waste an hour measuring both of their faces
How about you give me the ratios and i'll tell you if you're right or wrong
nig thinks his tuffYoure eight in that ut wiuld be a waste, because you wouldnt find one

Not even gonna skim through this false ai slop, we have eyes, loli even has scleral show in the pic you provided above and come on nigga how does she have a high ct, its vlearly not true

Bevause with the ct you measured lolis by starting at the medial cantus and placing the bottom of the arrow at the outer cantus while with valeria you started to the side of hhe medial cantus and the middle to upper part of the arrow line is along the outer cantusView attachment 4596437View attachment 4596444
If she is looking up in a picture..
View attachment 4596450
Doesn't mean she has scleral show..
View attachment 4596452View attachment 4596453
View attachment 4596458View attachment 4596464
In the first she clearly does, the second is taken from belowDoesn't mean she has scleral show..
![]()
![]()
The fact that it's gonna take u an hour explains a lotNigga i'm not tryna waste an hour measuring both of their faces
How about you give me the ratios and i'll tell you if you're right or wrong
It was even more brutal than what i imagnedThe fact that it's gonna take u an hour explains a lot
Valeria has better eye aspect ratio and bizygo/bigonial, upper/lower lip and jfa
View attachment 4596487View attachment 4596488
She looks boneless
Daniela Pestova
The fact that it's gonna take u an hour explains a lot
Valeria has better eye aspect ratio and bizygo/bigonial, upper/lower lip and jfa
View attachment 4596487View attachment 4596488
Honestly daniela is still high stacyView attachment 4596503
And obviously her height doesn't help lol..
View attachment 4596514
She looks extremely good, but her nose is a little too wide and her midface is a little too long for her proportions..
View attachment 4596529
>proceds to pick an even worse photoView attachment 4596541
Nice cherrypicked photo
Legit valerias eye aspect ratio + canthal tilt is worlds more masculine compared to doutzen. Also the rather flatter JFA is feminizing aswell thought valeria does have a better one. And the lower lip to upper lip is ideal for both so i have no idea what you're on about talking about 4 ratios that barely make a difference.
Valeria is basically a dimorphismcel compared to doutzen