Top 10 stacies

Edited then clearly, shes not even close to valeria, 2 pics are also compketepy diff
Alla Bruletova looks good on live video. Valeria also looks quite different in candids.

Alla
Valeria
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
My oneitis is unironically up there and if i posted her you would agree
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: hej1377
Even with cherry picked photos its not close, valeria fogs, most attractive human of all time by a landslide
I mean with my own eyes I can see that's not true. But you're entitled to that opinion.
 
I mean with my own eyes I can see that's not true. But you're entitled to that opinion.
Her contrast is shit, valerias obviously mogs, way better midface, nose ratio everything, pfl to pfh, brytal, not to mention valeria has eve teeth and more balanced lower third, fogs on any metric
 
This is my personal list, if you dont like it suck my mog

1. Valeria mazza, this is an axiom of the universe and therefore self explanatory and not up for discussion

View attachment 4595900View attachment 4595916


2. Brooke shields, pretty water

View attachment 4595933

3. hilary rhoda
View attachment 4595947View attachment 4595948

4. Mini anden
View attachment 4595959View attachment 4595962
5. Lonneke engel
View attachment 4595970
6. Anja winkelmann
View attachment 4595973View attachment 4595975

7. Gisele bundchen
View attachment 4595979View attachment 4595982

8. Marine vacht

View attachment 4595984View attachment 4595990

9. Blanca soler
View attachment 4596022View attachment 4596023

10. Jessica lee buchanan
View attachment 4596039View attachment 4596051

Honorable mentions

Alain delon's grand daughter, this is a really hot take i pressume but again you can go ahead and suck my mog
View attachment 4595997

Taylor hill
View attachment 4596035

Doutzen kroes
View attachment 4596053
1769724858358

Valeria Mazza 😍
 

Attachments

  • 1769724838954.gif
    1769724838954.gif
    2.8 MB · Views: 0
  • Love it
Reactions: hej1377
This is my personal list, if you dont like it suck my mog

1. Valeria mazza, this is an axiom of the universe and therefore self explanatory and not up for discussion

View attachment 4595900View attachment 4595916


2. Brooke shields, pretty water

View attachment 4595933

3. hilary rhoda
View attachment 4595947View attachment 4595948

4. Mini anden
View attachment 4595959View attachment 4595962
5. Lonneke engel
View attachment 4595970
6. Anja winkelmann
View attachment 4595973View attachment 4595975

7. Gisele bundchen
View attachment 4595979View attachment 4595982

8. Marine vacht

View attachment 4595984View attachment 4595990

9. Blanca soler
View attachment 4596022View attachment 4596023

10. Jessica lee buchanan
View attachment 4596039View attachment 4596051

Honorable mentions

Alain delon's grand daughter, this is a really hot take i pressume but again you can go ahead and suck my mog
View attachment 4595997

Taylor hill
View attachment 4596035

Doutzen kroes
View attachment 4596053
Nigga what is this list 😭😭😭😭💔💔💔💔💔💔
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
My number 1😍
Opinion on sasha pivovarova v0 cjjhoi6ljg1g1
Screenshot 20250901 201012 com zhiliaoapp musically DetailActivity
Sasha pivovarova 216617 fit
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
1. Valeria mazza, this is an axiom of the universe and therefore self explanatory and not up for discussion

Images 7
Screenshot 20260129 212701 TikTok
Argentina mogs
1769724982120
 
  • +1
Reactions: Divineincel and hej1377
putting doutzen kroes in the hm tells me everything 💔
Carried by averageness, bloatcell subpar eye shape for this tier
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag
Carried by averageness, bloatcell subpar eye shape for this tier
legit on par with valeria btw
best side oat too as a cherry ontop
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag and hej1377
1 ai girl(that got mogged) and 2 htbs, which generous to the second

Bro really wanted me to pull up the stats and numbers.. :veryCat: :feelswhat:

Television Recherche GIF by ZDF Magazin Royale


OK then..


1769724231113
1769724196799
1769724183642

1769724281613



#CriterionLoli BahiaValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Loli scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry98.80 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Loli is closer to perfect symmetry
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618001.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Loli hits exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618021.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Loli is almost perfect
4Lip width / nose width1.618001.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Loli is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.617801.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Loli has fuller natural volume
6Jaw–cheekbone angle128.50°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Loli is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 0.9951 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Loli is closer to ideal
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+8.80°+6.50°Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6171.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Loli is closer to maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+1.9°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Loli has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissueHigh + sharpHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Loli has ideal sharp balance
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)Very highHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Loli is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.5°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Loli has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.5 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Loli is more compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.0°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Loli has higher feminine arch

1000004258


#CriterionNora KubiliuteValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Nora scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry99.12 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Nora is near-perfect
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618091.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Nora is within 0.0001 of exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618041.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Nora hits almost perfect ratio
4Lip width / nose width1.618011.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Nora is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.61800رس1.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Nora is fuller and closer to ideal
6Jaw–cheekbone angle129.18°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Nora is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 1.00001 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Nora is perfect 1:1:1
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+9.52°+6.50°Valeria has moderate tilt; Nora has extreme positive hunter effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, very largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Nora has zero and larger irises
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6181.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Nora is at maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+2.1°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Nora has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissuePerfect balanceHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Nora has ideal feminine cushion
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)IdealHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Nora is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.8°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Nora has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.2 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Nora is very compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.2°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Nora has higher feminine arch

1000004260


#CriterionAlla BruletovaValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Alla scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry99.05 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Alla is near-perfect
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618111.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Alla is within 0.0001 of exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618061.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Alla hits almost perfect ratio
4Lip width / nose width1.618021.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Alla is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.618011.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Alla is fuller and closer to ideal
6Jaw–cheekbone angle129.05°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Alla is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 1.00001 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Alla is perfect 1:1:1
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+9.48°+6.50°Valeria has moderate tilt; Alla has extreme positive hunter effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, very largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Alla has zero and larger irises
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6181.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Alla is at maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+2.2°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Alla has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissuePerfect balanceHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Alla has ideal feminine cushion
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)IdealHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Alla is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.9°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Alla has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.0 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Alla is very compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.3°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Alla has higher feminine arch

1000004262


Jon Stewart Queue GIF
Its Over Blueberry GIF by Kudaberi
 
Last edited:
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: richoxne and mrdouchebag
legit on par with valeria btw
best side oat too as a cherry ontop
Shes valeria but worse in every single feature, not close at all
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mohi_100 and mrdouchebag
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag and hej1377
1000001589
Ansp

Prime Anna Speckhart fogs hard tbh
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: ilian, Tr0ubLe and hej1377
Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect
Valeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero
Not even gonna skim through this false ai slop, we have eyes, loli even has scleral show in the pic you provided above and come on nigga how does she have a high ct, its vlearly not true
 
  • +1
Reactions: mohi_100
Bro really wanted me to pull up the stats and numbers.. :veryCat: :feelswhat:

Television Recherche GIF by ZDF Magazin Royale


OK then..


View attachment 4596333View attachment 4596326View attachment 4596323
View attachment 4596336


#CriterionLoli BahiaValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Loli scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry98.80 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Loli is closer to perfect symmetry
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618001.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Loli hits exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618021.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Loli is almost perfect
4Lip width / nose width1.618001.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Loli is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.617801.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Loli has fuller natural volume
6Jaw–cheekbone angle128.50°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Loli is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 0.9951 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Loli is closer to ideal
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+8.80°+6.50°Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6171.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Loli is closer to maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+1.9°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Loli has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissueHigh + sharpHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Loli has ideal sharp balance
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)Very highHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Loli is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.5°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Loli has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.5 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Loli is more compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.0°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Loli has higher feminine arch

View attachment 4596386

#CriterionNora KubiliuteValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Nora scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry99.12 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Nora is near-perfect
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618091.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Nora is within 0.0001 of exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618041.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Nora hits almost perfect ratio
4Lip width / nose width1.618011.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Nora is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.61800رس1.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Nora is fuller and closer to ideal
6Jaw–cheekbone angle129.18°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Nora is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 1.00001 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Nora is perfect 1:1:1
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+9.52°+6.50°Valeria has moderate tilt; Nora has extreme positive hunter effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, very largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Nora has zero and larger irises
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6181.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Nora is at maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+2.1°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Nora has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissuePerfect balanceHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Nora has ideal feminine cushion
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)IdealHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Nora is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.8°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Nora has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.2 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Nora is very compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.2°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Nora has higher feminine arch

View attachment 4596396

#CriterionAlla BruletovaValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Alla scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry99.05 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Alla is near-perfect
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618111.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Alla is within 0.0001 of exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618061.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Alla hits almost perfect ratio
4Lip width / nose width1.618021.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Alla is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.618011.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Alla is fuller and closer to ideal
6Jaw–cheekbone angle129.05°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Alla is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 1.00001 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Alla is perfect 1:1:1
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+9.48°+6.50°Valeria has moderate tilt; Alla has extreme positive hunter effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, very largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Alla has zero and larger irises
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6181.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Alla is at maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+2.2°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Alla has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissuePerfect balanceHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Alla has ideal feminine cushion
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)IdealHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Alla is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.9°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Alla has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.0 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Alla is very compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.3°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Alla has higher feminine arch

View attachment 4596397

Jon Stewart Queue GIF
Its Over Blueberry GIF by Kudaberi
1769725436585
gayropean moment
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag
''every single feature'' :lul::lul::lul::lul::lul::lul:
Which facial ratios is kroes better at

Let me guess, u gonna dnr and prove yourself wrong
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: hej1377
Fuck i realized now amber heard exists, she deserved an hm at least
 
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag, mohi_100 and Akademik_Komarov
I'm already tired of looking at this crap on the street. There are too many of them here in Russia. And you think they are the most beautiful in your country!:lul:
Is this the bare minimum for the humble ltn:lul:, beggar can't be chooser and I'd love her
 
  • JFL
Reactions: hej1377
Bro really wanted me to pull up the stats and numbers.. :veryCat: :feelswhat:

Television Recherche GIF by ZDF Magazin Royale


OK then..


View attachment 4596333View attachment 4596326View attachment 4596323
View attachment 4596336


#CriterionLoli BahiaValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Loli scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry98.80 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Loli is closer to perfect symmetry
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618001.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Loli hits exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618021.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Loli is almost perfect
4Lip width / nose width1.618001.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Loli is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.617801.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Loli has fuller natural volume
6Jaw–cheekbone angle128.50°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Loli is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 0.9951 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Loli is closer to ideal
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+8.80°+6.50°Valeria has less extreme tilt; Loli has stronger hunter eyes effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Loli has zero
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6171.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Loli is closer to maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+1.9°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Loli has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissueHigh + sharpHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Loli has ideal sharp balance
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)Very highHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Loli is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.5°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Loli has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.5 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Loli is more compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.0°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Loli has higher feminine arch

View attachment 4596386

#CriterionNora KubiliuteValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Nora scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry99.12 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Nora is near-perfect
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618091.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Nora is within 0.0001 of exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618041.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Nora hits almost perfect ratio
4Lip width / nose width1.618011.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Nora is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.61800رس1.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Nora is fuller and closer to ideal
6Jaw–cheekbone angle129.18°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Nora is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 1.00001 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Nora is perfect 1:1:1
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+9.52°+6.50°Valeria has moderate tilt; Nora has extreme positive hunter effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, very largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Nora has zero and larger irises
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6181.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Nora is at maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+2.1°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Nora has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissuePerfect balanceHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Nora has ideal feminine cushion
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)IdealHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Nora is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.8°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Nora has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.2 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Nora is very compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.2°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Nora has higher feminine arch

View attachment 4596396

#CriterionAlla BruletovaValeria MazzaKey Differences vs Valeria Mazza (why Alla scores higher)
1Overall left-right facial symmetry99.05 %97.50 %Valeria has minor cheek and jaw asymmetry; Alla is near-perfect
2Eye–nose–mouth vertical ratio1.618111.614Valeria’s mid-face is longer; Alla is within 0.0001 of exact φ
3Interocular distance / nose width1.618061.610Valeria’s nose bridge is wider; Alla hits almost perfect ratio
4Lip width / nose width1.618021.615Valeria’s lips are narrower relative to nose; Alla is exact
5Lip volume / nose width1.618011.612Valeria’s lip volume is lower; Alla is fuller and closer to ideal
6Jaw–cheekbone angle129.05°131.00°Valeria’s jaw is sharper/more angular; Alla is softer and more feminine
7Forehead–nose–chin thirds1 : 1 : 1.00001 : 1 : 0.94Valeria’s chin third is shorter (longer mid-face); Alla is perfect 1:1:1
8Canthal tilt (hunter eyes)+9.48°+6.50°Valeria has moderate tilt; Alla has extreme positive hunter effect
9Eye size + scleral show negativeZero scleral, very largeSlight scleral, mediumValeria shows minor white under iris; Alla has zero and larger irises
10Lip fullness (natural volume)1.6181.612Valeria’s lips are less voluminous; Alla is at maximum
11Positive inner canthal tilt (bedroom eyes)+2.2°+1.0°Valeria’s inner tilt is minimal; Alla has stronger seductive effect
12High cheekbones with soft tissuePerfect balanceHigh but sharperValeria’s cheeks are more angular with less soft tissue; Alla has ideal feminine cushion
13High estrogen look (soft jaw, round cheeks, babyface)IdealHigh but sharper jawValeria’s jaw is more defined; Alla is maximally soft/neotenous
14Small, slightly upturned noseUpturn 4.9°Upturn 3.2°Valeria’s nose is less upturned and longer; Alla has maximum youthful upturn
15Small chin + short philtrumPhiltrum 11.0 mmPhiltrum 13.0 mmValeria has longer philtrum; Alla is very compact
16Low brow ridge + arched browsArched 8.3°Arched 7.0°Valeria’s brows are lower; Alla has higher feminine arch

View attachment 4596397

Jon Stewart Queue GIF
Its Over Blueberry GIF by Kudaberi

I don't get the obsession with Alla. She looks boneless.

If someone is more into the slavic look, there are plenty of more attractive slavic women.

Daniela Pestova is a good example.

daniela-pestova-v0-3gj3v0mok38a1.jpg


Even IG gigafrauder Nata Lee looks better in my opinion.


w88fduyno7md1.jpeg
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Akademik_Komarov
Which facial ratios is kroes better at

Let me guess, u gonna dnr and prove yourself wrong
Nigga i'm not tryna waste an hour measuring both of their faces
How about you give me the ratios and i'll tell you if you're right or wrong
 
  • JFL
Reactions: hej1377
I don't get the obsession with Alla. She looks boneless.

If someone is more into the slavic look, there are plenty of more attractive slavic women.

Daniela Pestova is a good example.

daniela-pestova-v0-3gj3v0mok38a1.jpg


Even IG gigafrauder Nata Lee looks better in my opinion.


w88fduyno7md1.jpeg
Yk what, these are good shouts even though the swcond is obviously giga frauded like you said
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag
Nigga i'm not tryna waste an hour measuring both of their faces
How about you give me the ratios and i'll tell you if you're right or wrong
Youre eight in that ut wiuld be a waste, because you wouldnt find one
 
  • JFL
Reactions: mohi_100
Give me a good undistorted pic of both and i'll measure
 
Not even gonna skim through this false ai slop, we have eyes, loli even has scleral show in the pic you provided above and come on nigga how does she have a high ct, its vlearly not true

1000004269
1000004271


If she is looking up in a picture..

1769726241554


Doesn't mean she has scleral show.. :veryCat:

1000004273
1000004275


1000004276
1000004277
 
  • +1
Reactions: richoxne
Bevause with the ct you measured lolis by starting at the medial cantus and placing the bottom of the arrow at the outer cantus while with valeria you started to the side of hhe medial cantus and the middle to upper part of the arrow line is along the outer cantus
Doesn't mean she has scleral show.. :veryCat:

1000004273
1000004275
In the first she clearly does, the second is taken from below
 
Nigga i'm not tryna waste an hour measuring both of their faces
How about you give me the ratios and i'll tell you if you're right or wrong
The fact that it's gonna take u an hour explains a lot

Valeria has better eye aspect ratio and bizygo/bigonial, upper/lower lip and jfa
16531
16528
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
Also considered putting lima as hm but tbh i do find her a little bit overrated
 
  • +1
Reactions: mrdouchebag and hej1377
The fact that it's gonna take u an hour explains a lot

Valeria has better eye aspect ratio and bizygo/bigonial, upper/lower lip and jfa
View attachment 4596487View attachment 4596488
7e18f2dd5ac90705d3249da1a863b92d

Nice cherrypicked photo

Legit valerias eye aspect ratio + canthal tilt is worlds more masculine compared to doutzen. Also the rather flatter JFA is feminizing aswell thought valeria does have a better one. And the lower lip to upper lip is ideal for both so i have no idea what you're on about talking about 4 ratios that barely make a difference.

Valeria is basically a dimorphismcel compared to doutzen
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: mrdouchebag and hej1377
View attachment 4596541
Nice cherrypicked photo

Legit valerias eye aspect ratio + canthal tilt is worlds more masculine compared to doutzen. Also the rather flatter JFA is feminizing aswell thought valeria does have a better one. And the lower lip to upper lip is ideal for both so i have no idea what you're on about talking about 4 ratios that barely make a difference.

Valeria is basically a dimorphismcel compared to doutzen
>proceds to pick an even worse photo
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mohi_100 and Sink

Similar threads

CelestialEmpire
Replies
15
Views
2K
LWD
LWD
D
Replies
27
Views
2K
black power 🤴🏾✊🏾
black power 🤴🏾✊🏾
heightmaxxing
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chadeep
Chadeep
D
Replies
19
Views
4K
Deleted member 80684
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top