top 5 smartest people who ever lived + top 5 overrated

where does ramanujan fall into this
i feel like if u talk about pure math he has to be up there
but not all time at all
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big Daddy
where does ramanujan fall into this
i feel like if u talk about pure math he has to be up there
but not all time at all

a special story for sure
 
  • +1
Reactions: acm
top 5:
1. von neumann
2. newton
3. gauss
4. leibniz
5. da vinci

honorable mention: euler

top 5 overrated:
1. tesla
2. einstein
3. weinberg
4. descartes
5. aristotle

honorable mention: wittgenstein

BONUS:

top 5 (positive) references that scream retard alert:
1. schopenhauer
2. nietzsche
3. orwell
4. freud
5. bukowski
tesla is a serb and ur a croat so its understandable:LOL::LOL::LOL:

newton is so underrated, but ive only figured it out recently, genius
 
top 5:
1. von neumann
2. newton
3. gauss
4. leibniz
5. da vinci

honorable mention: euler

top 5 overrated:
1. tesla
2. einstein
3. weinberg
4. descartes
5. aristotle

honorable mention: wittgenstein

BONUS:

top 5 (positive) references that scream retard alert:
1. schopenhauer
2. nietzsche
3. orwell
4. freud
5. bukowski
yo bro u forgot @foidhater123
 
Based on what?
Scientists are usually smart
Philosophers are overrated
 
tesla is a serb and ur a croat so its understandable:LOL::LOL::LOL:

newton is so underrated, but ive only figured it out recently, genius

lol if you think anyone here with an iq above 95 cares about this. and we are presenting him as the product of our own country anyway. but when you are spammed with his muh genius throughout your childhood, you start diving deeper and realize most of it is just hype

newton is literally the antichrist, as he himself realized. shut down theology on a dare.
 
  • +1
Reactions: JordanFagget271
Gibbs, Clausius, Boltzmann, Poincaré, Helmholtz
All comparable to Von Neumann, perhaps even better

Einstein was quite clearly better than Von Neumann, imo
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Big Daddy
How does it feel to know nothing about the founders (or key contributors) of thermodynamics (just one example), except their names, and to keep mentioning von Neumann while pretending to have in-depth knowledge of history's top geniuses, even though you only know the five or ten most famous names?

I've seen this thread at least twice before

Von Neumann is in my stupid personal top 3 (IQ, definitely not for how revolutionary he was), by the way


You're a lawyer, right? Yeah
Stick to that
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Big Daddy
You forgot to mention Judith Butler
 
Last edited:
How does it feel to know nothing about the founders (or key contributors) of thermodynamics (just one example), except their names, and to keep mentioning Von Neumann while pretending to have in-depth knowledge of history's top geniuses, even though you only know the five or ten most famous names?

I've seen this thread at least twice before

Von Neumann is in my stupid personal top 3 (IQ, definitely not for how revolutionary he was), by the way


You're a lawyer, right? Yeah
Stick to that

lol at assuming i know nothing about those side characters. lol at treating thermodynamics as anything but a D tier discipline

i d stop posting in threads like this one if i were you

You're a lawyer, right? Yeah

reminder this clown has a degree in ... psychology :feelskek:

stick to discussions about deja vu tier topics with your 99 iq roastie colleagues, lil' bro
 
lol at assuming i know nothing about those side characters. lol at treating thermodynamics as anything but a D tier discipline

i d stop posting in threads like this one if i were you



reminder this clown has a degree in ... psychology :feelskek:

stick to discussions about deja vu tier topics with your 99 iq roastie colleagues, lil' bro
Degree in… physics
Bad memory
 
I'm pretty sure you don't know anything about that, it's not an assumption.

I could mention 20 other names that you barely know
 
I'm pretty sure you don't know anything about that, it's not an assumption.

I could mention 20 other names that you barely know

no you couldn't, i have a .docx file with like 400 guys to namedrop when i want to feel smart

did you actually expect your post was gonna shake my list up or mess up this thread? just lol at your sentience if so
 
no you couldn't, i have a .docx file with guys to namedrop when i want to feel smart
just names, in fact

If I asked you a specific question, you would have to look it up on Wikipedia
 
Honorable mention to the list would be Kant imo
 
did you actually expect your post was gonna shake my list up or mess up this thread? just lol at your sentience if so
I just wanted to remind you how limited your knowledge is, and while you're at it, define sentience for me
 
Special mention to the list would be Kant imo

hegel over him. but still better than those from my bonus 5 list by a wide margin
 
  • +1
Reactions: 14vic
I just wanted to remind you how limited your knowledge is, and while you're at it, define sentience for me

perception superior in relation to that of the average human
 
hegel over him. but still better than those from my bonus 5 list by a wide margin
I tried reading Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit and couldn't even finish 50 pages. Maybe true but he has a language that only a few can understand
 
  • +1
Reactions: Big Daddy
I tried reading Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit and couldn't even finish 50 pages. Maybe true but he has a language that only a few can understand

and i m one of them
 
  • +1
Reactions: 14vic
Decent, but let me define it better for you
One’s ability to make observations, or the depth to which you can do that
 
Difference between observation and perception?

Next lesson? Perhaps
 

Similar threads

F
Replies
10
Views
252
Big Daddy
Big Daddy
slayy
Replies
21
Views
419
Whiteboard7
Whiteboard7
FutureExoticChad
Replies
49
Views
2K
LampPostPrime
LampPostPrime
Klasik616
Replies
5
Views
161
vevcred
vevcred
Mainlander
Replies
27
Views
545
Mainlander
Mainlander

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Giornoblaze
Back
Top