Topology is a pedophile

you probably couldn't tell the difference between some 15 and 18 year olds
so true

i made a thread about it a while ago but it got deleted sadly
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
SHES 13 DOG
Big Whoop. She peaked then. Nothing is wrong with saying that
Im not implying id fuck her at any point
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: 59H390, topology and Orka
also this girl is so disgusting and inmature you do actually have to be a pedo to like this
1762993829334
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Perfectiοn, 59H390 and Orka
it doesn't matter what its called it still completely changes the argument
it is still pedophilia and you threw the entire category under the evil umbrella

you could've specified, 18+15 is fine, maybe even 14 tbh
 
@TechnoBoss
@Gengar
@SlayerJonas
@chadisbeingmade
There is nothing wrong (wait for context) with pedophilia if you don't harm anybody or threaten to do anything
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Orka and Grievous
it is still pedophilia and you threw the entire category under the evil umbrella

you could've specified, 18+15 is fine, maybe even 14 tbh
Nigga no u should've specified

The thread was literally about a 13 year old
 
  • +1
Reactions: 59H390
how you describe me:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Orka and Grievous
Bro idk about y’all but some 8th grade girls look 16 nowadays like I’m def in that if they bad

It’s not super common I’m just saying SOME
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Orka and takethewhitepill
Not a pedo but ill play devils advocate just for the sake of argument. Saying she looks best doesn't necessarily make you a pedophile like how you can say that jordan barret looks good without being gay. So it is possible to look from a modelling agency perspective and see that maybe they have sharper features because they havent been rounded out by the estrogen in the body
 
  • +1
Reactions: topology, Orka and m0ss26
@TechnoBoss
@Gengar
@SlayerJonas
@chadisbeingmade
jfl if you don't think gengar has dived head first into jb pussy
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: topology and m0ss26
Not a pedo but ill play devils advocate just for the sake of argument. Saying she looks best doesn't necessarily make you a pedophile like how you can say that jordan barret looks good without being gay. So it is possible to look from a modelling agency perspective and see that maybe they have sharper features because they havent been rounded out by the estrogen in the body
Holy fuck man

This entire forum

I swear
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Orka and Grievous
Bro idk about y’all but some 8th grade girls look 16 nowadays like I’m def in that if they bad

It’s not super common I’m just saying SOME
Now that is crazy shit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Grievous
Holy fuck man

This entire forum

I swear
im starting to see why people think theirs feds on this forum
Id bet a few of these ngas agreeing with this have seen/have CP
 
  • +1
Reactions: 59H390
Bro no way I’m being demonized over a 4 year age gap
8th grade is 12 to 13 nigga. You can find them attractive maybe. Hard maybe. But you cannot be in that bruh
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: topology and 59H390
im starting to see why people think theirs feds on this forum
Id bet a few of these ngas agreeing with this have seen/have CP
Shi making me sick to my stomach mane
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Orka and Grievous
BLUD

STOP IM FINNA FUCKING PUKE
Attractive as in he says they look 16 and he didnt know yet. But when you learn that you say no
 
  • +1
Reactions: m0ss26 and topology
Attractive as in he says they look 16 and he didnt know yet. But when you learn that you say no
If some older looking 14 year old is bad as hell and is all over me she can rape me for all I care ✌️
 
  • JFL
Reactions: topology
If some older looking 14 year old is bad as hell and is all over me she can rape me for all I care ✌️
Wwyd if a girl aged physically twice as fast, looks 16 but is actually 8 and wants to sleep eith you? You want to hit that? Hell nah nigga
 
  • +1
Reactions: topology
Wwyd if a girl aged physically twice as fast, looks 16 but is actually 8 and wants to sleep eith you? You want to hit that? Hell nah nigga
Your literally contradicting what you said earlier.

Not a pedo but ill play devils advocate just for the sake of argument. Saying she looks best doesn't necessarily make you a pedophile like how you can say that jordan barret looks good without being gay. So it is possible to look from a modelling agency perspective and see that maybe they have sharper features because they havent been rounded out by the estrogen in the body
 
I DO NOT DATE PEOPLE BELOW A 2 YEAR AGE
i meant above 2 year age gap. this did make me look like a pedophile.

16 year olds are the youngest i'd date
 
i meant above 2 year age gap. this did make me look like a pedophile.

16 year olds are the youngest i'd date
its weird as fuck if ur attracted to 13 year olds. whether u act on it or not
 
  • WTF
Reactions: topology
Your literally contradicting what you said earlier.
they're about different categories.

the devil’s-advocate example was talking about aesthetic evaluation (meaning without sexual desire)

the other one was about sexual desire

Statement A: "Someone can have aesthetically good features without it implying attraction"
Statement B: "Acting on sexual impulses involves age, consent, and morality"

A does not contradict B
 
U LITERALLY SAID U WERE WHAT
i said she looked the best at 13 not that i'm attracted to her. i am not attracted to jordan barrett when i say he looked best before surgeries like the other guy pointed out
 
i said she looked the best at 13 not that i'm attracted to her. i am not attracted to jordan barrett when i say he looked best before surgeries like the other guy pointed out
Apples and oranges
 
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN
its weird as fuck if ur attracted to 13 year olds. whether u act on it or not
depends on the 13 year old but in general I’m not

It’s the same for the reverse, if an 18 year old LOOKS 12 I’m unattracted
 
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN
Your literally contradicting what you said earlier.
Im not. My point is that he wants to have sex with a child. But it is permissable to recognise someone as objectively having good looks in the same sense as a modelling scout. Most models are scouted at young teenage years, such as 13. The scouts are not looking to have sex with that child. So to recognise objective markers such as good angularity is not necessarily pedophilic. But wanting to fuck kids is.
 
  • +1
Reactions: topology
Wwyd if a girl aged physically twice as fast, looks 16 but is actually 8 and wants to sleep eith you? You want to hit that? Hell nah nigga
do I know she’s mentally age 8? What kind of 8 year old wants to sleep with people
 
Im not. My point is that he wants to have sex with a child. But it is permissable to recognise someone as objectively having good looks in the same sense as a modelling scout. Most models are scouted at young teenage years, such as 13. The scouts are not looking to have sex with that child. So to recognise objective markers such as good angularity is not necessarily pedophilic. But wanting to fuck kids is.
Apples and oranges
 
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN
Apples and oranges
i'm talking about when someone’s features looked their best, not about being attracted to them. there is no implication there, you're free to use an implication diagram to prove your point
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: takethewhitepill and 59H390
i'm talking about when someone’s features looked their best, not about being attracted to them. there is no implication there, you're free to use an implication diagram to prove your point
talkin bout impliocation diagram blud what


Its very wrong to talk about a 13year old like that


Common sense

Plus, your going back on what you said.

First, its "im not a pedophile, its just in my head, i dont act on it"

Now , its nooooo its different Bc of jordan barrett?

Your making no sense
 
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN
First, its "im not a pedophile, its just in my head, i dont act on it"
i never implied i was attracted to her i just made a statement that was misrepresented.

Now , its nooooo its different Bc of jordan barrett?
it's no different because no implication was made in each. i have said multiple times i'm not attracted to her and you're over here trying to say i am

Its very wrong to talk about a 13year old like that
this is a site about looks. i am going to say when someone looked the best
 
  • +1
Reactions: m0ss26
i am going to say when someone looked the best
There is no difference between finding someone good looking and attractive blud.

With shi like modelling thats different

But use your fucking head

You dont say that shi about minors

13 YEAR OLDS

EXTEMELY COMMON SESNE

U also repped replies talkin bout "Pedophilia is fine as long as it doesnt hurt anybody"

Ur switching up on what u said.

Screenshot 2025 11 12 162210
 
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN
This thread makes me realize I needa start plotting on some freshman, they haven’t been corrupted yet
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Orka, topology and 59H390
U also repped replies talkin bout "Pedophilia is fine as long as it doesnt hurt anybody"
under the assumption you do not watch CP then there's nothing wrong as no one is hurt.

There is no difference between finding someone good looking and attractive blud.

With shi like modelling thats different

But use your fucking head

You dont say that shi about minors

13 YEAR OLDS

EXTEMELY COMMON SESNE
once again, this is a site based on looks. she objectively did peak at 13, i don't know what is not understood.

also, i never claimed to find her good looking or attractive. i just claimed they were the best looking at 13
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
under the assumption you do not watch CP then there's nothing wrong as no one is hurt.

That statement combined with ur comments confirms what im saying😹

Nothing wrong with pedophilia?
 
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN
Nothing wrong with pedophilia?
if you do not go for minors or watch CP there is nothing wrong, correct. you're free to debunk me
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: m0ss26, Orka and 59H390
if you do not go for minors or watch CP there is nothing wrong, correct. you're free to debunk me
ITS FUCKED UP AND WEIRD AND WRONG
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN and Orka
if you do not go for minors or watch CP there is nothing wrong, correct. you're free to debunk me
Also

Your arguing your not a pedophile

But simultaneously defending pedophilia????????
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: AmericanMTN and Orka
ITS FUCKED UP AND WEIRD AND WRONG
if someone doesn’t pursue minors and doesn’t view anything illegal, then there’s no external harm. in that case, the issue isn’t moral wrongdoing but an unhealthy psychological pattern. it isn’t ‘wrong’ in the sense of hurting others, but it is unhealthy, similar to how smoking harms the individual rather than others
 

Similar threads

KKamikaze
Replies
81
Views
1K
Torycel
Torycel
Jason Voorhees
Replies
67
Views
1K
NotAMogger
NotAMogger
NiZr
Replies
15
Views
444
TrueLabRat
TrueLabRat
lastofus123
Replies
156
Views
3K
lastofus123
lastofus123
D
Replies
45
Views
1K
Deleted member 155219
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top