Tall midwit
Iron
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2026
- Posts
- 82
- Reputation
- 65
If you’ve ever been in BP, looksmaxing, or NEET circles, you’ve definitely noticed the prevalent misogynistic culture. While women can be hated for a lot of things, most of the misogyny in these circles is low-IQ.
A very stupid rhetoric, and it comes across to any enlightened individual as nothing more than hypocrisy and jealousy.
It’s common for incels to moralfag about women whoring around, but incels themselves aren’t whoring around because they don’t have the means to do so—not because of any moral principle, as much as they love to act like that.
The truth of the matter is that women have access to a large dating pool and can therefore have intercourse with multiple people in short periods and accumulate large body counts. The only reason incels, or most men for that matter, aren’t doing this is because they simply can’t.
Before you moralfag a slut, ask yourself: Are you not a man-whore because you’re principled, or because you simply can’t be one?
There is plenty of proof that men end up being sluts when given the opportunity. The two biggest examples are, firstly and most obviously, Chads, the majority of whom fuck around like rabbits, and secondly, gay men, who have an easier pool to choose from and end up being a community filled with man-whores.
It’s so bad that gay men literally struggle to find long-term partners because a lot of gay men just want to fuck and then move on to the next one
. But muh foids are whores, bro.
If you had the chance, YOU would be a whore, buddy.
Quite common in incel circles are the claims that women, firstly, don’t date short men and are hypergamous and, secondly, look down on and bully them.
For the first part, while hypergamy is true, it’s mainly caused by Chads and HTNs dating down.
Let’s imagine you’re a woman, right? You see all these mid and ugly fellow foids dating better-looking men. You would then understand that you have the ability to do so as well—and why wouldn’t you?
Would you not be hypergamous if your society allowed it? Let’s not kid ourselves.
The second part, about women bullying or looking down on short men, is actually quite true. I can’t deny that. However, it’s done by both men and women.
Short men are more likely to be bullied than average-height or tall men, and this also applies in all-boys schools. So, while short men are certainly likely to be looked down upon, insulted, and bullied by foids, they’re also likely to experience the same treatment from men.
You might be familiar with the Hiplet trend and Damion, the TikTok account that popularized it—a movement that started as a pushback against discrimination against short men by women, right?
Well, Damion was recently criticized by Chadlet, a shortcel content creator. And guess what Damion’s reaction was? Damion, who is ironically a tall guy at 6'4", immediately made fun of his height, lmfao.
The dude has also previously posted a video making fun of and mocking a short, balding man. JFL if you think men aren’t also heightist, don’t discriminate against short people, and won’t mock you for being short.
This is by far the dumbest claim thrown around.
Every single study done on average female and male intelligence has concluded that there are no meaningful differences in overall average intelligence.
Men average somewhat higher on certain spatial tasks, particularly mental rotation, and sometimes on quantitative or mechanical reasoning.
Women average somewhat higher in verbal episodic memory, phonemic verbal fluency, and several reading-related measures.
Now, I hear you asking: “But why aren’t there many female scientists and shit?”
Well, it’s most likely due to the greater male variability hypothesis, which proposes that male scores are sometimes more spread out, even when male and female averages are the same.
A wider male distribution produces:
Therefore, these statements can simultaneously be true:
Suppose both groups have an average IQ of 100:
For an IQ of 130 or above:
For an IQ of 70 or below:
Thus, you might see approximately 1.3 men for every woman at both extremes, despite identical averages. These figures are illustrative rather than universal.
A major international analysis examined 1,654 country–subject–assessment cases from PISA, TIMSS, and PIRLS:
Therefore, statistically, there are most likely more male scientists than female scientists partly because there are more male geniuses in general, coupled, of course, with women historically not being pushed enough in academia and with other socioeconomic factors.
Statistically speaking, most women you encounter are as intelligent as most men you encounter.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
link.springer.com
Hopefully, you’ve now been educated about your low-IQ misogynistic claims and will strive to be better.
Debunking Misogynistic Rhetoric and Claims Thrown Around Online
Number 1: “Women are whores who fuck a lot of men.”
A very stupid rhetoric, and it comes across to any enlightened individual as nothing more than hypocrisy and jealousy.
It’s common for incels to moralfag about women whoring around, but incels themselves aren’t whoring around because they don’t have the means to do so—not because of any moral principle, as much as they love to act like that.
The truth of the matter is that women have access to a large dating pool and can therefore have intercourse with multiple people in short periods and accumulate large body counts. The only reason incels, or most men for that matter, aren’t doing this is because they simply can’t.
Before you moralfag a slut, ask yourself: Are you not a man-whore because you’re principled, or because you simply can’t be one?
There is plenty of proof that men end up being sluts when given the opportunity. The two biggest examples are, firstly and most obviously, Chads, the majority of whom fuck around like rabbits, and secondly, gay men, who have an easier pool to choose from and end up being a community filled with man-whores.
It’s so bad that gay men literally struggle to find long-term partners because a lot of gay men just want to fuck and then move on to the next one
. But muh foids are whores, bro.If you had the chance, YOU would be a whore, buddy.
Women Are Evil: Shortcel Edition
Quite common in incel circles are the claims that women, firstly, don’t date short men and are hypergamous and, secondly, look down on and bully them.
For the first part, while hypergamy is true, it’s mainly caused by Chads and HTNs dating down.
Let’s imagine you’re a woman, right? You see all these mid and ugly fellow foids dating better-looking men. You would then understand that you have the ability to do so as well—and why wouldn’t you?
Would you not be hypergamous if your society allowed it? Let’s not kid ourselves.
The second part, about women bullying or looking down on short men, is actually quite true. I can’t deny that. However, it’s done by both men and women.
Short men are more likely to be bullied than average-height or tall men, and this also applies in all-boys schools. So, while short men are certainly likely to be looked down upon, insulted, and bullied by foids, they’re also likely to experience the same treatment from men.
You might be familiar with the Hiplet trend and Damion, the TikTok account that popularized it—a movement that started as a pushback against discrimination against short men by women, right?
Well, Damion was recently criticized by Chadlet, a shortcel content creator. And guess what Damion’s reaction was? Damion, who is ironically a tall guy at 6'4", immediately made fun of his height, lmfao.
The dude has also previously posted a video making fun of and mocking a short, balding man. JFL if you think men aren’t also heightist, don’t discriminate against short people, and won’t mock you for being short.
“Women Are Stupid and Low-IQ”
This is by far the dumbest claim thrown around.
Every single study done on average female and male intelligence has concluded that there are no meaningful differences in overall average intelligence.
Men average somewhat higher on certain spatial tasks, particularly mental rotation, and sometimes on quantitative or mechanical reasoning.
Women average somewhat higher in verbal episodic memory, phonemic verbal fluency, and several reading-related measures.
Now, I hear you asking: “But why aren’t there many female scientists and shit?”
Well, it’s most likely due to the greater male variability hypothesis, which proposes that male scores are sometimes more spread out, even when male and female averages are the same.
A wider male distribution produces:
[]More exceptionally high-scoring men.
[]More exceptionally low-scoring men.- Roughly the same average man and average woman.
Therefore, these statements can simultaneously be true:
[]Women and men have the same average intelligence.
[]Men are somewhat more numerous at both extreme ends of certain cognitive distributions.
Numerical Example
Suppose both groups have an average IQ of 100:
[]Women: standard deviation of 15.
[]Men: standard deviation of approximately 16—about 14% greater variance.
For an IQ of 130 or above:
[]Women: about 2.3%.
[]Men: about 3.1%.
For an IQ of 70 or below:
[]Women: about 2.3%.
[]Men: about 3.1%.
Thus, you might see approximately 1.3 men for every woman at both extremes, despite identical averages. These figures are illustrative rather than universal.
A major international analysis examined 1,654 country–subject–assessment cases from PISA, TIMSS, and PIRLS:
[]Male variance was greater in 93% of cases.
[]Average male variance was approximately 14% higher.
[]Male variability was found in reading, mathematics, and science.
[]Boys appeared more often among high mathematics and science performers, but were also disproportionately represented among very weak performers—particularly in reading.
Therefore, statistically, there are most likely more male scientists than female scientists partly because there are more male geniuses in general, coupled, of course, with women historically not being pushed enough in academia and with other socioeconomic factors.
Statistically speaking, most women you encounter are as intelligent as most men you encounter.
Sex/gender differences in general cognitive abilities: an investigation using the Leiter-3 - PMC
Research has shown that differences between males and females are not in general intelligence, but only in some specific factors and tasks. We used the Italian standardization of the Leiter-3, which is a completely nonverbal cognitive battery, to ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Gender differences in variability and extreme scores in an international context - Large-scale Assessments in Education
This study examines gender differences in the variability of student performance in reading, mathematics and science. Twelve databases from IEA and PISA were used to analyze gender differences within an international perspective from 1995 to 2015. Effect sizes and variance ratios were computed...
link.springer.com
Hopefully, you’ve now been educated about your low-IQ misogynistic claims and will strive to be better.
Last edited:
