Tradcopers GTFIH

[AlexAP]

So many tradcopers here believe women weren't that promiscuous in the "good, old days." Let's look at these graphs:

JFL men in the 1950s reported having 10+ sexual partners and women 1-3? Okay ... believe that if you want.

The truth is: Women were lying then and are lying today, but women today are more honest, so the numbers are more equal today. The "tradwife" meme was always a cope.

 

[AlexAP]

Another disaster for @BrendioEEE

 

[Deleted member 13137]

50’s larpers make me want to crawl into a bunker and never come out

 

[n0rthface]

Yep, the men were 100% telling the truth. Men never lie about these types of things

 

[AlexAP]

Yep, the men were 100% telling the truth. Men never lie about these types of things

Both were obviously lying. Men had fewer sexual partners, women had more than 1-3 (jfl).

 

[Deleted member 7725]

View attachment 1332036

Is that a real painting JFL?

 

[Deleted member 8244]

That last image is kinda sussy

 

[TsarTsar444]

View attachment 1332036

Thoughts?? @Pythagoras

 

[TsarTsar444]

Is that a real painting JFL?

Yes jfl

 

[sandcelmuttcel]

sums up @Pythagoras rhetoric

 

[sytyl]

blackpilled again

 

[Enfant terrible]

Both were obviously lying. Men had fewer sexual partners, women had more than 1-3 (jfl).

I think its believeable
It actually pretty easy to get laid

 

[AlexAP]

I think its believeable
It actually pretty easy to get laid

Maybe, at least it's sure to say the women were lying because the numbers must add up.

 

[BrendioEEE]

 

[AlexAP]

View attachment 1332104
View attachment 1332105

All surveys from the time have the same results. And they can't be true.

Cope if you think the tradcon trope was reality for the majority.

 

[BrendioEEE]

All surveys from the time have the same results. And they can't be true.

Cope if you think the tradcon trope was reality for the majority.

The numbers are too high, they should be lower, the survey's were done in the late 80s to mid 2010's, the survey sample was skewed as a result, most people who were around back then in their prime had dementia, died, or are being neglected by the time these surveys were being conducted. The fact you think the numbers were too low, shows how bluepilled you are.

 

[gamma]

Probably men counted prostitutes too as sexual partners

 

[AlexAP]

Probably men counted prostitutes too as sexual partners

I don't think that explains the large difference. Women had more than 1-3.

 

[gamma]

I don't think that explains the large difference. Women had more than 1-3.

It was common fucking prostitutes in the past
But yeah average laycount of women is higher than what statistics say, I told you time ago

 

[AlexAP]

But yeah average laycount of women is higher than what statistics say, I told you time ago

I know it's higher, as it can't be that men have more (even in todays surveys, men report more).

But todays numbers seem more honest, as the differences aren't that high anymore.

 

[Beetlejuice]

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Whores have always existed, but a smaller percentage of women were whores back then.

 

[hebbewem]

Every blackpill person should know this is true because not every women or man married the best looking they can get so obviously they will cheat

 

[Deleted member 15338]

Cope thread tbh. Problem of modern sexual life is marriage i dont want to marry a non virgin girl.

 

[Pythagoras]

Thoughts?? @Pythagoras

embrace tradition ofc.

 

[Lev Peshkov]

lol tradcope cringe

brb messgaging one of my hoes for gawkgawk 3000 while u coom urself to sleep

 

[AlexAP]

Whores have always existed, but a smaller percentage of women were whores back then.

But the numbers are still clearly not true. Women had more than 1-3, these surveys used by tradcopers just captured the virtue signaling of women at the time.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

But the numbers are still clearly not true. Women had more than 1-3, these surveys used by tradcopers just captured the virtue signaling of women at the time.

IDK what your core argument is, but I think it's safe to say that the collapse of societally-enforced monogamy has led to an increase in female promiscuity. Although female nature is female nature regardless.

 

[AlexAP]

IDK what your core argument is, but I think it's safe to say that the collapse of societally-enforced monogamy has led to an increase in female promiscuity. Although female nature is female nature regardless.

I think it was done secretly in the past and more openly now. If there's a difference in the amount of lifetime sexual partners for women it's not that big.

 

[sytyl]

pair bonding is pseudo science, and it's important for women to have had many partners for them to get things out of their system (much like men) so they can be better adults (and ones that know what they want)

 

[Reckless Turtle]

I think it was done secretly in the past and more openly now. If there's a difference in the amount of lifetime sexual partners for women it's not that big.

I disagree. The consequences of infidelity were much worse for women prior to WWII than they are now. And fucking another man's wife or a virgin carried harsh consequences for men.

 

[AlexAP]

I disagree. The consequences of infidelity were much worse for women prior to WWII than they are now. And fucking another man's wife or a virgin carried harsh consequences for men.

There was a lot of cheating with the milk man, the postman, etc., and paternity fraud couldn't be identified before DNA tests.

 

[AlexAP]

pair bonding is pseudo science, and it's important for women to have had many partners for them to get things out of their system (much like men) so they can be better adults (and ones that know what they want)

It's not "important", especially not for all (women or men), but it's not like women can't love a man if they're not virgins.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

There was a lot of cheating with the milk man, the postman, etc., and paternity fraud couldn't be identified before DNA tests.

Getting caught and outed as a whore would be a threat to a woman's security. I'm not arguing that the US was ever super strict with female promiscuity, but olden times were certainly stricter than modern times.

Would you argue that women are just as applicably promiscuous in extreme environments like Afghanistan and Dagestan?

 

[AlexAP]

Getting caught and outed as a whore would be a threat to a woman's security. I'm not arguing that the US was ever super strict with female promiscuity, but olden times were certainly stricter than modern times.

Would you argue that women are just as applicably promiscuous in extreme environments like Afghanistan and Dagestan?

Afghanistan is not anywhere close to the U.S. in the 1950s. Afghanistan has death penalty for premarital or extramarital sex.

I think there's not a very big difference to the U.S. in the 1950s and the U.S. today, but there might be a small difference.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

Afghanistan is not anywhere close to the U.S. in the 1950s. Afghanistan has death penalty for premarital or extramarital sex.

I think there's not a very big difference to the U.S. in the 1950s and the U.S. today, but there might be a small difference.

This supports my point that the answer is somewhere in the middle. We're simply arguing about how "oppressive" the early 20th century US was, and how much of an impact said "oppression" had on female promiscuity.

 

[Lord-Arthur_17]

Right wing ideologies are so cringe, they tell men to focus on themselves while encouraging violence and they don't care about you like not at all. They force morality like the cucks they actually are, only weak pussies created the right wing when you think deeply about it

On the other hand, left wing mogs hard, it's supportive unlike right, yes both parties don't give a fuck about you but left wing atleast pretends like they care about you. Atleast you can embrace your true self in the leftwing community and exploit the system as it is. While in the right wing community you get tortured if you don't act obedient

I think both parties are shit but if i was to choose, i would go with leftwing always. Right is repressing true human nature.

Absolutely, nowadays it's only the pussies who are right wing because they cannot exploit the system and fight in this cruel world methaporically speaking

Muh right wing and hitler, meanwhile high T men are not worried and fuck other women while these cucks complain.