MrGlutton
interesting.....
- Joined
- May 24, 2019
- Posts
- 10,604
- Reputation
- 19,085
i could see multiple scenarios of this ending
god emperor trump or an oligarchy forming
god emperor trump or an oligarchy forming
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
gain your own opinion instead of parroting what others say you delusional weeb.
the last true american president.He won't. He is the last American president.
How is congress the oligarchy lol? Trump is the oligarch.the last true american president.
the oligarchy has been formed(congress) they will see to it that they drive america to the depth of hell even if they're unaware of what they're really doing.
there's a possibility that a caesar may rise from the ashes, and take over.
but america's fall is inevitable.
Do you know what an oligarchy is? There can't be one single oligarch.How is congress the oligarchy lol? Trump is the oligarch.
Trump is the front man of the American rich elite. Calling the two chambers of congress which make up the modern state "oligarchy" while viewing a rich billionaire the opposite when his entire program consisted of cutting taxes for his rich friends while scapegoating ethnics as the opposite is beyond comical. Trump represents the degeneracy of the Western World. He has no redeeming qualities, just look at his speech and compare them with the speeches of Roosevelt or Lincoln. He was voted in by the masses of subhumans who live in the present and couldn't care less about the World their children live in.Do you know what an oligarchy is? There can't be one single oligarch.
the long term implications of democracy is too dangerous. YES it could be ideal say short term, but in the long term you get the population(men) becoming dumbed down to an extreme EXTENT which results in women gaining power and emotion dominating our thinking.His impeachment (if it even happens) would speak as a prime example and a testament to how the standpoint and appeal from leftists is purely emotional - and how the appeal of pathos dominates the party, that of which takes up the majority of overall voters; and VAST majority of minority voters.
It’s no wonder that most are women. It’s not wonder that the statistically lower IQ minorities are also heavily in favor of the party.
They’re grasping at straws to pin him with anything as they’re still bitter about losing the election. Tons of funding that could have went to starving children in the ghettos of Chicago they pretend to care about - went to trying to impeach president Trump under the guise that he worked alongside Russia to influence the election in his favor. Probably because they were so surprised that a president could have such a good relationship and not get bullied around by Putin like Obama did.
After a year of investigation they found nothing. Tons of time and money wasted. Then we find out Peter Stzok, the head of the FBI was caught sending text messages pre election saying that he was going to put a stop to Trump being elected. Using HIS power unethically. THAT, was the only “Russian collusion” lol.
If Trump contacted the Ukraine about investigating Biden it does not matter. Democrats are ignoring the fact that he was probably right and that Biden was probably snaking around. Regardless, the Ukraine said there was no force or pressure - therefor the case should be thrown out and there is no justification for impeachment.
The whole entire premise is to make illogical, dumbfounded emotional appeals to minority and other ethnik voters, compromising even both citizen and veteran care - to win majority.
This is a large reason why the open border policies are so highly promoted by the left - the proof of this is that there’s no considerable increase in economic GDP growth or decrease in crime by having so many others flood the country, in fact all data shows the poor opposite. It’s obvious that votes (disguised as social justice) are the main contributor to the open border policies. Meaning American citizens are less of an interest to politicians as they can be procured by emotional arguments and campaign marketing with starving African children and separated families.
The harsh reality is that most of the “families” being separated are actually men leaving their REAL families behind in Mexico or Syria - and cowardly seeking refuge in the US posing as 15-25 year olds; when in fact they’re much older - and committing crimes at an unprecedented, unsurmountable rate compared to that of the average American citizen.
If you’re a democratic voter as a white citizen of the United States, there is absolutely no reason that you shouldn’t commit a brutal violent suicide.
No one is suggesting he is "ushering in a new Renaissance", idk where you got that from. Congress was probably referred to as an oligarchy by the above poster because they are not acting in the interests of the people but instead are serving the interests of a small elite at the people's expense. Also again, Trump can't be an oligarch - he can be part of an oligarchy, but he can't be the 1 single oligarch. That isn't an oligarchy.Trump is the front man of the American rich elite. Calling the two chambers of congress which make up the modern state "oligarchy" while viewing a rich billionaire the opposite when his entire program consisted of cutting taxes for his rich friends while scapegoating ethnics as the opposite is beyond comical. Trump represents the degeneracy of the Western World. He has no redeeming qualities, just look at his speech and compare them with the speeches of Roosevelt or Lincoln. He was voted in by the masses of subhumans who live in the present and couldn't care less about the World their children live in.
I don't mind it as I am happy to see the World burn but to think he is ushering in a new Renaissance is ludicrous.
its funny you say that bc statistically liberals iq mog conservativesHis impeachment (if it even happens) would speak as a prime example and a testament to how the standpoint and appeal from leftists is purely emotional - and how the appeal of pathos dominates the party, that of which takes up the majority of overall voters; and VAST majority of minority voters.
It’s no wonder that most are women. It’s not wonder that the statistically lower IQ minorities are also heavily in favor of the party.
They’re grasping at straws to pin him with anything as they’re still bitter about losing the election. Tons of funding that could have went to starving children in the ghettos of Chicago they pretend to care about - went to trying to impeach president Trump under the guise that he worked alongside Russia to influence the election in his favor. Probably because they were so surprised that a president could have such a good relationship and not get bullied around by Putin like Obama did.
After a year of investigation they found nothing. Tons of time and money wasted. Then we find out Peter Stzok, the head of the FBI was caught sending text messages pre election saying that he was going to put a stop to Trump being elected. Using HIS power unethically. THAT, was the only “Russian collusion” lol.
If Trump contacted the Ukraine about investigating Biden it does not matter. Democrats are ignoring the fact that he was probably right and that Biden was probably snaking around. Regardless, the Ukraine said there was no force or pressure - therefor the case should be thrown out and there is no justification for impeachment.
The whole entire premise is to make illogical, dumbfounded emotional appeals to minority and other ethnik voters, compromising even both citizen and veteran care - to win majority.
This is a large reason why the open border policies are so highly promoted by the left - the proof of this is that there’s no considerable increase in economic GDP growth or decrease in crime by having so many others flood the country, in fact all data shows the poor opposite. It’s obvious that votes (disguised as social justice) are the main contributor to the open border policies. Meaning American citizens are less of an interest to politicians as they can be procured by emotional arguments and campaign marketing with starving African children and separated families.
The harsh reality is that most of the “families” being separated are actually men leaving their REAL families behind in Mexico or Syria - and cowardly seeking refuge in the US posing as 15-25 year olds; when in fact they’re much older - and committing crimes at an unprecedented, unsurmountable rate compared to that of the average American citizen.
If you’re a democratic voter as a white citizen of the United States, there is absolutely no reason that you shouldn’t commit a brutal violent suicide.
you're wrong.its funny you say that bc statistically liberals iq mog conservatives
i personally dont care ab Trumps impeachment bc its only one more year, and if they manage to impeach him hell have served most of his term anyway.
regardless the Republican(and Democratic) party is destroying America by giving more and more power to elites.
cutting taxes, benefits, etc.
the only three ppl that can save America are Yang, Bernie, and Tulsi
its over if anyone gets elected. esp since the Republican lineup is dogshit
OP was juxtaposing Trump with the congress. I simply replied that it's Trump who is the oligarch (out of the two). I mean how was this not comprehendible to you?No one is suggesting he is "ushering in a new Renaissance", idk where you got that from. Congress was probably referred to as an oligarchy by the above poster because they are not acting in the interests of the people but instead are serving the interests of a small elite at the people's expense. Also again, Trump can't be an oligarch - he can be part of an oligarchy, but he can't be the 1 single oligarch. That isn't an oligarchy.
unbridled capitalism is fucking retarded to be honest, there's nothing wrong with many of Bernie's ideas. A lot of them are incredibly reasonable.you're wrong.
bernie for instance will make things much worse with his communist ideas.
this is what you DONT want as president if you care for the country's well-being and know economics.
I've explained how you're wrong twice now, I'm not going to do it again.I simply replied that it's Trump who is the oligarch (out of the two). I mean how was this not comprehendible to you?
dogshit-tier conservative argumentyou're wrong.
bernie for instance will make things much worse with his communist ideas.
this is what you DON'T want as president if you care for the country's well-being and know economics.
He wants to completely delete private healthcare though which I’m not with ngl son.dogshit-tier conservative argument
im taking economics rn
he runs on a social democratic platform which he calls "democratic socialism".
free healthcare, free college, and slightly higher taxes FOR THE RICH isnt socialism
literally @all the eurocels on looksmax and they will tell u they have these 3 things to some extent
Impeached but not convicted yet.Holy shit. He's been impeached.
That’s because if you strongly believe in the premise of clean energy and air, agricultural growth and are progressive in the way of global climate change (which most of the younger generation feels strongly about)its funny you say that bc statistically liberals iq mog conservatives
i personally dont care ab Trumps impeachment bc its only one more year, and if they manage to impeach him hell have served most of his term anyway.
regardless the Republican(and Democratic) party is destroying America by giving more and more power to elites.
cutting taxes, benefits, etc.
the only three ppl that can save America are Yang, Bernie, and Tulsi
its over if anyone gets elected. esp since the Republican lineup is dogshit
YOOOOOO WTF THATS CRAZYHoly shit. He's been impeached.
yes i dont agree with that portion either. thats why yang is my front line up.He wants to completely delete private healthcare though which I’m not with ngl son.
Impeached but not convicted yet.
Climate change isn’t real. JFL people used to call of global warming now it’s climate changeThat’s because if you strongly believe in the premise of clean energy and air, agricultural growth and are progressive in the way of global climate change (which most of the younger generation feels strongly about)
It’s virtually impossible to vote right on those issues because it doesn’t fall in line with their values or beliefs so it tips the scale highly.
Most Republican candidates could dominate the election if their campaign funding was as high as Trumps - and they had a strong inclination to reduce gas emissions and promote other climate related ideals to help the environment; irregardless of where they stood on issues related to the economy and immigration.
So yes, smarter people are going to vote for the policies that favor the earth and are backed up scientists in order to progress and fix our climate issues.
I understood your explanation. I was just hoping you merely misunderstood, now I know you are just plain stupid. What you apparently have an issue is the fact I used the word "oligarch" in a singular instead of plural probably thinking no such term exists but to your surprise "oligarch" is actually a real term and it refers to a member of the oligarchy. The reason I used the article "the" (which at first was the thing I thought was confusing you) was to reverse the juxtaposition OP assumed but that I already explained in my last post.I've explained how you're wrong twice now, I'm not going to do it again.
trump may be a rich man, but he's not an oligarch, he has no TRUE power. it's the congress that run things not trump.I understood your explanation. I was just hoping you merely misunderstood, now I know you are just plain stupid. What you apparently have an issue is the fact I used the word "oligarch" in a singular instead of plural probably thinking no such term exists but to your surprise "oligarch" is actually a real term and it refers to a member of the oligarchy. The reason I used the article "the" (which at first was the thing I thought was confusing you) was to reverse the juxtaposition OP assumed but that I already explained in my last post.
lol you have a rock bottom IQ mate, not gonna bother replying to you again tbhI understood your explanation. I was just hoping you merely misunderstood, now I know you are just plain stupid. What you apparently have an issue is the fact I used the word "oligarch" in a singular instead of plural probably thinking no such term exists but to your surprise "oligarch" is actually a real term and it refers to a member of the oligarchy. The reason I used the article "the" (which at first was the thing I thought was confusing you) was to reverse the juxtaposition OP assumed but that I already explained in my last post.
various policies the Democratic party have appeal to the higher iq portion of the populationThat’s because if you strongly believe in the premise of clean energy and air, agricultural growth and are progressive in the way of global climate change (which most of the younger generation feels strongly about)
It’s virtually impossible to vote right on those issues because it doesn’t fall in line with their values or beliefs so it tips the scale highly.
Most Republican candidates could dominate the election if their campaign funding was as high as Trumps - and they had a strong inclination to reduce gas emissions and promote other climate related ideals to help the environment; irregardless of where they stood on issues related to the economy and immigration.
So yes, smarter people are going to vote for the policies that favor the earth and are backed up scientists in order to progress and fix our climate issues.
Man you got absolutely demolished. Go read up basic definitions on wikipedia before you debate anything. I still hope you simply got confused and now you are doubling down because of ego and that English is not your native language. If I am wrong I am sorry but I can't help you, not everyone can be part of the triple digit club.lol you have a rock bottom IQ mate, not gonna bother replying to you again tbh
Seems like you’re not well versed on the implications of what free healthcare and free college entails. Especially in countries that are structured even mildly similarly to the US.various policies the Democratic party have appeal to the higher iq portion of the population
free healthcare, free college, higher taxes for the wealthy
only low iq or loadedcels disagree with these three propositions
Trump didnt have a high campaign funding, hes just really dominant so he stands out on media and so gets more publicity. most policies Republicans have during this election cycle are dogshit-tier and benefit the wealthy.
true economics is thinking about the long term implications of policy.Seems like you’re not well versed on the implications of what free healthcare and free college entails. Especially in countries that are structured even mildly similarly to the US.
It shows a fundamental lack of understanding of history. That’s what happens when you teach revisionist history on US soil to students who are nearly six figures in debt. They’re high IQ enough to sing the verses, but they don’t know what the song is about.
Just print out more money so everyone has more theory
i actually dont care about the college part. the rest of this country can suffer. NY already has free state college and i have fafsa im set to go.Seems like you’re not well versed on the implications of what free healthcare and free college entails. Especially in countries that are structured even mildly similarly to the US.
It shows a fundamental lack of understanding of history. That’s what happens when you teach revisionist history on US soil to students who are nearly six figures in debt. They’re high IQ enough to sing the verses, but they don’t know what the song is about.
Just print out more money so everyone has more theory
if you knew basic economics youd understand that free college and healthcare isnt communismtrue economics is thinking about the long term implications of policy.
free healthcare and free college sounds ideal
but it just can't work.
and now you have these ideologue communists like bernie and cortez who are gaining power fast
i fear for this country
European style health care isn't even more expensive to run (it's actually cheaper) and college could get more affordable by even doing negligible things such as 0 interest loans and partially subsidized STEM-M degrees.Seems like you’re not well versed on the implications of what free healthcare and free college entails. Especially in countries that are structured even mildly similarly to the US.
It shows a fundamental lack of understanding of history. That’s what happens when you teach revisionist history on US soil to students who are nearly six figures in debt. They’re high IQ enough to sing the verses, but they don’t know what the song is about.
Just print out more money so everyone has more theory
it saves us in the long run actuallyEuropean style health care isn't even more expensive to run (it's actually cheaper) and college could get more affordable by even doing negligible things such as 0 interest loans and partially subsidized STEM-M degrees.
These two changes would probably not even cost the American society anything extra.
I don’t think anyone is arguing that Bernie is going to turn us into the ussr in a single term. The problem is that he is running for greater government control of labor/production. Our government is a massive, corrupt, bureaucratic body that really only grows. We can’t really hope to shrink it, but we can hope to slow it’s growth. Bernie will jump start us towards commienism and the economy/inflation will get worse, so more brainwashed normies will vote in big government thinking it’ll save them.i actually dont care about the college part. the rest of this country can suffer. NY already has free state college and i have fafsa im set to go.
im curious, so what DO the implications of free healthcare and college entail?
if you knew basic economics youd understand that free college and healthcare isnt communism
i doubt you know what TRUE communism is
America is too fat for universal healthcare. There’s also a problem of multiple different states operating their own healthcare service, which results in standards being wildly different across the country.it saves us in the long run actually
even a Koch brother backed Libertarian think tank came came to the same conclusion when trying to fudge the numbers for free healthcare
Theres been multiple studies that demonstrate America would save somewhere between 2 trillion and 17 trillion dollars in taxpayer dollars if they were to switch to Universal healthcare, factoring this in.America is too fat for universal healthcare. There’s also a problem of multiple different states operating their own healthcare service, which results in standards being wildly different across the country.
Bernie’s proposed tax hikes will stifle growth.