D
Deleted member 30942
Kraken
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2023
- Posts
- 3,222
- Reputation
- 2,815
The whole point of science is questioning things
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
All contextsin what context?
ok idiotAll contexts
if you believe in science i dont know what to tell youok idiot
Low iqok idiot
ok bro i will start to believe in conspiracy theoriesif you believe in science i dont know what to tell you
Do what you willok bro i will start to believe in conspiracy theories

bro there is more to truth than science or conspiracy theories, you dont have to choose between 2 extremesok bro i will start to believe in conspiracy theories
Thisquestion science with meaningful questions and don't come off arrogant when you don't like the answers
"science is an extreme"bro there is more to truth than science or conspiracy theories, you dont have to choose between 2 extremes
Why would you trust it on no basisWhy would you question science on no basis.
it is an extreme to put all your faith into science yes, it is another extreme to only believe in conspiracy theories. you have to find a right balance, but if you believe science always equals truth then thats an extreme"science is an extreme"
ok bro
There is a basis. Scientific papers and method. In which case shouldn't you trust the scienceWhy would you trust it on no basis
why iq of this site is so lowit is an extreme to put all your faith into science yes, it is another extreme to only believe in conspiracy theories. you have to find a right balance, but if you believe science always equels truth then thats an extreme
You are a smart userit is an extreme to put all your faith into science yes, it is another extreme to only believe in conspiracy theories. you have to find a right balance, but if you believe science always equals truth then thats an extreme

you just ran out of argumentswhy iq of this site is so low
u never had a single one, im not even arguingyou just ran out of arguments
That's not really trusting itThere is a basis. Scientific papers and method. In which case shouldn't you trust the science
There is a basis. Scientific papers and method. In which case shouldn't you trust the science
ok so tell me why you think that science is always rightu never had a single one, im not even arguing
Yeahnot currently. Science nowadays is a cult and you get shunned for questioning its core tenets
No need to trust anythingWhat to trust then? Yahweh or the Spaghetti monster?
ObviouslyExcept that doesn't mean that some highschool dropout boomer's opinion has the same value of a scientist
Some schizo with a tinfoil hat on facebook didn't make his tests and researches, he just decided to believe someone else

Exactlyi don't mistrust all science, just the stuff that has an agenda behind it, like
take the jab
don't eat meat
bug meat is good for you
industrial seed oils are good for you
saturated fat causes heart disease
stuff like that
and i just lol when people say shit like "well this scientist said so" or "my doctor said so", just str8 appeal to authority shitExactly
A lot of these things aren't even "science"
For example meat has been proven by real science to actually be good for you
how can science both proof that meat is good for you and at the same time bad for you? who says which science is correct in this case? science is not the same as physical laws for example, science is a manmade conceptExactly
A lot of these things aren't even "science"
For example meat has been proven by real science to actually be good for you
Yeahand i just lol when people say shit like "well this scientist said so" or "my doctor said so", just str8 appeal to authority shit
scientists were also telling us ciggs are good for us and that fat is bad and that we should eat lots of processed sugar instead
now they are telling us red meat causes heart disease and that industrial engine oil is heart healthy
once new research starts connecting seed oils to diabetes and alzheimers and skin cancer then they will say oops my bad lmfao
Scientific articles can be wronghow can science both proof that meat is good for you and at the same time bad for you? who says which science is correct in this case? science is not the same as physical laws for example, science is a manmade concept
Conspiracy theories.What to trust then? Yahweh, Vishnu or the Spaghetti monster?
yep which is why science is no ultimate truth and can be wrong too @MakhachevScientific articles can be wrong
Yeah that's pretty much my pointyep which is why science is no ultimate truth and can be wrong too @Makhachev
(im not arguing with you btw just trying to add onto your point)
This is pretty much exactly my pointIf something is self evident then I shouldn't need to 'trust' it. The only reason 'science' said that is because it was so obvious the entire vaccination campaign and production and press coverage was dodgy as fuck and a gigantic money grab.
They were simply tapping into the human tendency to want to believe in something bigger than themselves. Since most people have moved away from religion they have to put their faith in Man. Science is the mechanism in which people begin to create a religion out of a need to worship and have faith in something.