D
Deleted member 10987
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2020
- Posts
- 38,463
- Reputation
- 49,416
@SayHeyHey
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
There are blonde Turks tho>blond turk
nah they are muhacır balkanites. you can't find a real anatolian turk that is blonde.There are blonde Turks tho
Og Medieval/ancient turks could have blonde hair toonah they are muhacır balkanites. you can't find a real anatolian turk that is blonde.
those accounts are only about cumans and yenisei people though. they were completely different people than oghuz turks anyways.Og Medieval/ancient turks could have blonde hair too
Chinese/Persian accounts confirm this
And even oghuz i think toothose accounts are only about cumans and yenisei people though. they were completely different people than oghuz turks anyways.
they were whiter than iranian and arab subhumans due to the aryan genes. but they were not blondes for sure.And even oghuz i think too
They were whiter than we think
Also what about all those red haired early ottomans ?
Nah thats a huge memethey were whiter than iranian and arab subhumans due to the aryan genes. but they were not blondes for sure.
also ottomans were fucking whites since the start, second ruler orhan was married to a byzantine noblewoman.
just look at the seljuk art and see how they depicted themselves, they looked no different from east asians.
bruh just look at medieval turkic DNA samples. we even have two samples from 15th century ottoman period and they are 50% mongoloid. don't believe everything those retarded pant-turkist faggots say on the net. they have a huge inferiority-complex and known for writing false history and tweaking pseudo-scientific bullshit. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#6/39.343/33.794Nah thats a huge meme
They didnt looked cucked east asian at all
Even mongols dont look east asian
They were mainly Caucasoid since -200 BC
They were like 90 % Caucasoid 10 % Mongoloid
Where did all those mongoloid genes went then ?bruh just look at medieval turkic DNA samples. we even have two samples from 15th century ottoman period and they are 50% mongoloid. don't believe everything those retarded pant-turkist faggots say on the net. they have a huge inferiority-complex and known for writing false history and tweaking pseudo-scientific bullshit. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#6/39.343/33.794
so what? even most of the curries are descended from IE paternally. some of turks have IE paternal haplogroups but they're not the majority. you can look up at any medieval turkic samples and all of them are hapas. min. 30% mongoloid. they looked chinky as fuck. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#3/52.43/49.04Turks by themselves are descendant of IE people paternally
So even original ones werent fully mongolo but half/hapas
Also two samples is nothing
But i know turkey is at best 35 % turkic and 10 % in most part
Doesnt mean ancient turks were chinky looking people
Indians/Iranians are not IE at all and are just faggot larpersso what? even most of the curries are descended from IE paternally. some of turks have IE paternal haplogroups but they're not the majority. you can look up at any medieval turkic samples and all of them are hapas. min. 30% mongoloid. they looked chinky as fuck. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#3/52.43/49.04
here's a facial reconstruction of a gokturk (original medieval turk) based on the skull.
View attachment 1191495
ancient proto turks were 100% mongoloid. they became mutts by the medieval era in central asia and became even more muttified in anatolia.
Arent turks by themselves the Result of IE + local altaics ?so what? even most of the curries are descended from IE paternally. some of turks have IE paternal haplogroups but they're not the majority. you can look up at any medieval turkic samples and all of them are hapas. min. 30% mongoloid. they looked chinky as fuck. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#3/52.43/49.04
here's a facial reconstruction of a gokturk (original medieval turk) based on the skull.
View attachment 1191495
ancient proto turks were 100% mongoloid. they became mutts by the medieval era in central asia and became even more muttified in anatolia.
Also are you turkish ?so what? even most of the curries are descended from IE paternally. some of turks have IE paternal haplogroups but they're not the majority. you can look up at any medieval turkic samples and all of them are hapas. min. 30% mongoloid. they looked chinky as fuck. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#3/52.43/49.04
here's a facial reconstruction of a gokturk (original medieval turk) based on the skull.
View attachment 1191495
ancient proto turks were 100% mongoloid. they became mutts by the medieval era in central asia and became even more muttified in anatolia.
the majority of them is descended from aryans still. even a big part of dravidians are descended from IE aryans. and that's way being paternally descent from IE peoples doesn't prove anything as in case of some turks.Indians/Iranians are not IE at all and are just faggot larpers
Only Europeans IE are aryan
This guy look hapa
proto turks were east siberian and 100% mongoloid for sure. as they migrated to central asia and eurasia they mixed with IE peoples.Arent turks by themselves the Result of IE + local altaics ?
yeahAlso are you turkish ?
So what do you think about all of this discusionthe majority of them is descended from aryans still. even a big part of dravidians are descended from IE aryans. and that's way being paternally descent from IE peoples doesn't prove anything as in case of some turks.
View attachment 1191502
he doesn't look hapa to me.
View attachment 1191507
proto turks were east siberian and 100% mongoloid for sure. as they migrated to central asia and eurasia they mixed with IE peoples.
yeah
turks are the biggest LARPers on the planet.So what do you think about all of this discusion
Do you think Turkey is Larping ?
So who are really Turks then ?turks are the biggest LARPers on the planet.
first we larped as rome, then hittites, then sumerians, then central asian mongols.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Language_Theory <- they teached this bullshit in schools and told huns-hittites-etruscans-sumerians were turks in history books no wonder our academy is so unreliable. it's all shitty propaganda.
ethnicsSo who are really Turks then ?
Yeah i know but what kind of ethnics ?ethnics
i'd say 70% anatolian-west asian 20% central asian and 10% other (balkanite-iranian etc.)Yeah i know but what kind of ethnics ?
Just native Anatolians ?
What Turkey should do about his identity for you ?i'd say 70% anatolian-west asian 20% central asian and 10% other (balkanite-iranian etc.)
I have zero balkan genes and i have dark blonde hair. Blonde doesnt mean balkan retard balkanites are dark af.nah they are muhacır balkanites. you can't find a real anatolian turk that is blonde.
%50 is literally impossible jfl even at the time of gokturks mongoloid percent wasnt that high and turks are not east asian mongoloid in first place mirin historylet. You are probably arent turk-assimilated anyway this is why you shit on turks.bruh just look at medieval turkic DNA samples. we even have two samples from 15th century ottoman period and they are 50% mongoloid. don't believe everything those retarded pant-turkist faggots say on the net. they have a huge inferiority-complex and known for writing false history and tweaking pseudo-scientific bullshit. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#6/39.343/33.794
what a fool tbh y dna s that indo europeans carry is a MONGOLOID haplogroup that related to native american Q. So indo europeans descended from central asian nomads not other way around regardless of how much denied by whites. And original turks looked ANE which is amerindian jfl.so what? even most of the curries are descended from IE paternally. some of turks have IE paternal haplogroups but they're not the majority. you can look up at any medieval turkic samples and all of them are hapas. min. 30% mongoloid. they looked chinky as fuck. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#3/52.43/49.04
here's a facial reconstruction of a gokturk (original medieval turk) based on the skull.
View attachment 1191495
ancient proto turks were 100% mongoloid. they became mutts by the medieval era in central asia and became even more muttified in anatolia.
Agreed with thatturks are the biggest LARPers on the planet.
first we larped as rome, then hittites, then sumerians, then central asian mongols.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Language_Theory <- they teached this bullshit in schools and told huns-hittites-etruscans-sumerians were turks in history books no wonder our academy is so unreliable. it's all shitty propaganda.
Agreed with that tooi'd say 70% anatolian-west asian 20% central asian and 10% other (balkanite-iranian etc.)
How do you know its mongoloid ?what a fool tbh y dna s that indo europeans carry is a MONGOLOID haplogroup that related to native american Q. So indo europeans descended from central asian nomads not other way around regardless of how much denied by whites. And original turks looked ANE which is amerindian jfl.
It is proven many times and well known. R1b and R1a are originally native american mongoloid and related to Q. Fingolian N is mongoloid too only caucasian y dna majority countries in europe are sweden, denmark, some balkan places (I y dna) greece and turkey if you consider turkey europe (both j2).How do you know its mongoloid ?
It was probably neither and just ANE
E is what ?It is proven many times and well known. R1b and R1a are originally native american mongoloid and related to Q. Fingolian N is mongoloid too only caucasian y dna majority countries in europe are sweden, denmark, some balkan places (I y dna) greece and turkey if you consider turkey europe (both j2).
Would say they just ANEIt is proven many times and well known. R1b and R1a are originally native american mongoloid and related to Q. Fingolian N is mongoloid too only caucasian y dna majority countries in europe are sweden, denmark, some balkan places (I y dna) greece and turkey if you consider turkey europe (both j2).
E is what ?
Ane is mongoloid too if you consider natives mongoloid and scientists consider them mongoloid soWould say they just ANE
Calling them mongoloids will be too much
Mirin BB(erber)C ?Black
Yeah but originally was negroid this is why you have a big package bro mirin karabogaMirin BB(erber)C ?
But the EB1B1 hunter haplo originated from Lybia tho then they spread all over Maghreb
I consider natives Their own race (Amerindid)Ane is mongoloid too if you consider natives mongoloid and scientists consider them mongoloid so
It is like saing meds and nords are different race thoI consider natives Their own race (Amerindid)
Natives and east asians are too much different
We have big package because my ancestors literally took thousands of pic rel into their haremsYeah but originally was negroid this is why you have a big package bro mirin karaboga
Nah more like comparing Europeans VS indiansIt is like saing meds and nords are different race tho
Yeah tbh more like thatNah more like comparing Europeans VS indians
Difference is bigger but i guess lesser for siberians/mongols
kys you fucking historylet absent-brained faggot. this is the results of ma2195 ottoman sample and he is 47% percent mongoloid and gokturks were 45% mongoloid on average.%50 is literally impossible jfl even at the time of gokturks mongoloid percent wasnt that high and turks are not east asian mongoloid in first place mirin historylet. You are probably arent turk-assimilated anyway this is why you shit on turks.
JFL what utter bullshit. both Q and R originated in the time of ANE 40.000 years ago. they were no mongoloid or caucasoid races back then you fucking retard. they were australoid looking.what a fool tbh y dna s that indo europeans carry is a MONGOLOID haplogroup that related to native american Q. So indo europeans descended from central asian nomads not other way around regardless of how much denied by whites. And original turks looked ANE which is amerindian jfl.
Its because when i think mongoloidYeah tbh more like that
>both Q and R originated in the time of ANE 40.000 years ago. they were no mongoloid or caucasoid races back then you fucking retard. they were australoid looking.kys you fucking historylet absent-brained faggot. this is the results of ma2195 ottoman sample and he is 47% percent mongoloid and gokturks were 45% mongoloid on average.
View attachment 1191557
typical low iq turkist retard. "NOOOOO YOU CAN'T STATE FACTS THAT'S NOT MY PROPAGANDIST STATE TAUGHT ME OMG UR SHITTING ON MUH GLORIOUS TÜRKİŞH RACERINO "
and i'm 100% sure i'm more turkish than you jfl.
JFL what utter bullshit. both Q and R originated in the time of ANE 40.000 years ago. they were no mongoloid or caucasoid races back then you fucking retard. they were australoid looking.
I am not even turkist jfl what are you talking about also mirin how immature you are at internet tbh. You proved my point by gokturks and cherrypicked at ottoman times some random higher mongoloid induvidual so what should i say about that ? Both q and r are mongoloid AND EVERYONE KNOW THAT races were formated that time jfl we are not talking about monkey times they were not austroloid lookingkys you fucking historylet absent-brained faggot. this is the results of ma2195 ottoman sample and he is 47% percent mongoloid and gokturks were 45% mongoloid on average.
View attachment 1191557
typical low iq turkist retard. "NOOOOO YOU CAN'T STATE FACTS THAT'S NOT MY PROPAGANDIST STATE TAUGHT ME OMG UR SHITTING ON MUH GLORIOUS TÜRKİŞH RACERINO "
and i'm 100% sure i'm more turkish than you jfl.
JFL what utter bullshit. both Q and R originated in the time of ANE 40.000 years ago. they were no mongoloid or caucasoid races back then you fucking retard. they were australoid looking.
You not turkist ?I am not even turkist jfl what are you talking about also mirin how immature you are at internet tbh. You proved my point by gokturks and cherrypicked at ottoman times some random higher mongoloid induvidual so what should i say about that ? Both q and r are mongoloid AND EVERYONE KNOW THAT races were formated that time jfl we are not talking about monkey times they were not austroloid looking
What is the point of being turkist when %75 of turkey arent turkYou not turkist ?
Also they werent mongoloid or Caucasoid neither i think
What will you do thenWhat is the point of being turkist when %75 of turkey arent turk