Basically subjagated a bunch of natives who fought wit sticks and stones , and discovered america by chance
View attachment 1294846
Turks conquered russia, and europe, multiple times. All british fags did was fight some african nigga and abos
1 turkic brother vs 1000 snowchimps
We raped everybody turkic masterrace
Turkic chads went from chinkistan to india, to africa and to europe jfl
They used their ingenious military prowess to conquer advanced civilisations in europe, india, china etc, no other empire can compared to Turks.
How you cope my ancestors havenames that places in central asian and they look asian they look turanid volgid keep coping about us avrage turk haves 35% turkic dnaAnd nowadays hybrid anatolian-greeks are larping as turks.
Yeah lmao and almost 50% of indians have R1A haplogroup as well, but no one thinks they are real aryans either
Indians are not white jfl turks have 20-40%turkic dna and its very similar to central asian turks avrage turkish people doesnt looks turkic yes avrage kazakh or avrage krygz dont looks turkic too look at to turkish dna projectYeah lmao and almost 50% of indians have R1A haplogroup as well, but no one thinks they are real aryans either
File:Mapa de R1a.png - Wikimedia Commons
commons.wikimedia.org
Turkish people on average dont look TURKIC. Good for you that 35% of your DNA is "turkic" (btw link me a graph or study to prove this). Does this mean you people are going to discount the MAJORITY 65 PERCENT NATIVE DNA you people have to the peninsula?
Indians aren't white europeans, of course, i never denied it. Yet almost 50% of them share the same forefathers as eastern euros like Poles, as you can see on that map. No one would have a problem claiming eastern euros to be "aryan" simply for the color of their skin, but would deny the same to indians even both share a majority of their paternal heritage. LMAO and i'd say average kazakh, and kyrgyz looks more turkic compared to anatolian turks. Both populations have much more average monolid asiatic eyes and wide cheekbones (turkic traits), compared to turkish anatolians in which these traits aren't as prevalent.
No kazakh and kyrgz looks mongolian turanid is 30% mongoloud at max
turanid vs fully mongoloid
Haplogroups=/dna indians and white europeans dont have the same ancestors indians have 12% white dna because of mixing
View attachment 1294846
Turks conquered russia, and europe, multiple times. All british fags did was fight some african nigga and abos
Bruh they said east baltic +turanid to londonville and someother bullshit to steeltitan that guys are retardeds
Just cherrypick theory we win 100 wars they win 3 wars
We have more empires tho but mongol empire is not turkic
Turkic chads went from chinkistan to india, to africa and to europe jfl
They used their ingenious military prowess to conquer advanced civilisations in europe, india, china etc, no other empire can compared to Turks.
Keep coping about your raped ancestorsJust cherrypick theory we win 100 wars they win 3 wars
50% of Eastern euros and indians literally share the same paternal line lmao wtf are you talking about. No indian has white dna. (unless they have some recent euro dna from colonial times, or are literal mixes from recent white-south asian marriages in modern day). I think you are getting the aryans, and R1A confused for white Europeans, which they weren't, as such an identification had not been made back then. The only thing that differs is their maternal line. As indians mtDNA (the maternal haplogroup) is native to the subcontinent, where as european mtDNAs are native to what is now modern day continental europe.
According to scientists they are mix of whites and some other stuff like abos
Anthropologists hate him
wtf are you talking about lmao.
I dont give a fuck tbh but i was read a study says that avragr indians is 12% white in dna
Lmao a mutt talking about raped ancestrors.Keep coping about your raped ancestors
Keep coping whore
ok, then i guess this conversation is over then?
especially since you aren't willing to post any links to any studies or articles to back up your claims.You are the mutt cuck whiteboi
how you gonna cope? your great great grandmothers like our cockI read that study months agook, then i guess this conversation is over then?
Bruh
Coping pigskin
and russian tatar mutts were conquered by Mongols and turks thats why Russian royalty have y-hapologroup O a mongol lineage.
Germanic mutts like yourself are r1b aryan descents, guess what original aryans looked like this
Anglos lost against TURKIC bvlls, anglo cucks conquered primitive natives and lands that were inhabited by them, using superior technology, the only significant areas they controlled was india, which they didnt even really conquere more like manipulated small kingdsms into signing treatys and pitting them against each other - meanwhile turks conquered advnacned civilistions such as iran, china, europe, russia, genocide indo-europeans, raped balkn niggers to mongrelization, etc
Same with some poorer european groups
No mongols and turks are one and the same come from the same altaic family
Big Black Pill.
Turkic chads went from chinkistan to india, to africa and to europe jfl
They used their ingenious military prowess to conquer advanced civilisations in europe, india, china etc, no other empire can compared to Turks.
Fucking God, I don't know what you're doing in this incels forum when it shows from afar that you like to idolize pink penises.
Hahaha But if you also cornered and were dogs of the Huns.
Legit but real turks are mongoloid eurasians like kazakhs and uigurs not anatolian greeks
Turkic chads went from chinkistan to india, to africa and to europe jfl
They used their ingenious military prowess to conquer advanced civilisations in europe, india, china etc, no other empire can compared to Turks.
