Two men with very deviant ESRatios/IPDs yet high tier eye areas

S

Senssei

Iron
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Posts
171
Reputation
685
1602893421652
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hightwolf, Hades and Need2Ascend
second dude's eye area isn't good lmao
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 685, Deleted member 3591 and eyearea
mogger
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lev Peshkov and Need2Ascend
black dude has literal cat eyes
 
beckford such a god tier eye area, pure hunter
 
Too wide is so much better than too narrow
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 685, PrisonMike, Hades and 3 others
@MaxillaIsEverything explain Tyson Beckford’s ES ratio tbh unless OP miscalculated. Is he just an extreme outlier?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hightwolf
@MaxillaIsEverything explain Tyson Beckford’s ES ratio tbh unless OP miscalculated. Is he just an extreme outlier?
I measured his es ratio in two seperate pics and got 0.501 and 0.488
1603407890379
0.488
1603407919658
0.501

I think it's obv higher than 0.46 but I doub it's over 0.5, I think I only got 0.501 in the second pic because his head is tilted down (same with pic by op)
 

Attachments

  • 1603407893077.png
    1603407893077.png
    693 KB · Views: 30
  • +1
Reactions: Taylorswift
oh yeah and I got 0.488 for the pic by op. so idk

You probably went over the cheekbones on the left side cause his face is slightly turned sideways, you are seeing a bit of the area below the temples on a diagonal perspective. I can guarantee his ESRatio is at the very least 0.50.

1603414777129
1603415045080
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Hightwolf
You probably went over the cheekbones on the left side cause his face is slightly turned sideways, you are seeing a bit of the area below the temples on a diagonal perspective

View attachment 752180
wait I thought you were supposed to measure it like that
 
  • +1
Reactions: RichardwillImprove
wait I thought you were supposed to measure it like that

You measure from the widest frontal part of the cheekbone to the other one. When the head is slightly turned sideways, you have to look where the cheekbones actually ends (green to green), otherwise you will increase the cheekbones distance (orange to range).

1603415320124



@MaxillaIsEverything explain Tyson Beckford’s ES ratio tbh unless OP miscalculated. Is he just an extreme outlier?

His ESRatio is surely at least 0.50, I tested in many pictures, which means he is the opposite equivalent of someone with a 0.42 ESRatio. He just has a nicely wide and defined upper nose bridge, which brings harmony to the continuum between his eyes. Its all explained in this thread:

 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Hightwolf
How to hell does he have such a high ipd man.
 
@MaxillaIsEverything explain Tyson Beckford’s ES ratio tbh unless OP miscalculated. Is he just an extreme outlier?
outlier yes but his ES also is not as high as he says it is. Looks more like a 0,485/49 in pics without lens distortion so noticeable closer to 0,46.(yes that much is significant) Also black guys aesthetics are different from whites their anatomy is slightly different. The difference in ratios is minimal but features such as wider and fuller lips influence interplay of features and ratios as a whole. I also remember their IPD being generally wider so the average will be slightly above caucasian levels too as will the ideal ratios.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Need2Ascend and Taylorswift
outlier yes but his ES also is not as high as he says it is. Looks more like a 0,485/49 in pics without lens distortion so noticeable closer to 0,46.(yes that much is significant) Also black guys aesthetics are different from whites their anatomy is slightly different. The difference in ratios is minimal but features such as wider and fuller lips influence interplay of features and ratios as a whole. I also remember their IPD being generally wider so the average will be slightly above caucasian levels too as will the ideal ratios.

Could you show me a frontal pic of him without lens distortion so I could calculate? I didn´t get less than 0,50 in any of his pics and I did it with a ton. Someone with 0,485 would never look like this even with significant lens distortion.

1603674121152


He varies from around 0,50 to almost 0,52 in every pic, even professional ones (that never use fish eye type of lenses for portrait type of pictures). Guys in this forum got over-attached to ratios and he proves directly that sometimes, they don´t mean much at all.

1603674483580
 
Last edited:
Chase eye area is dogshit. You cannot have top tier eye area without somewhat decent PFL (26mm+).
 
  • +1
Reactions: Taylorswift
Chase eye area is dogshit. You cannot have top tier eye area without somewhat decent PFL (26mm+).

Chris Hemsworth has a very good eye area and his PFL is significantly less than that.
 

Similar threads

IHATEINDIANS
Replies
20
Views
758
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender
holy
Replies
25
Views
627
Frick.sebas
Frick.sebas
6
Replies
16
Views
497
juggingfent
juggingfent
InanimatePragmatist
Replies
84
Views
1K
Mike141
Mike141

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top