Uc or aqualix?

Futurehtn777

Futurehtn777

Mistral
Joined
Jul 7, 2025
Posts
2,011
Reputation
738
I have deep fat pads and i want to get rid of them , Whats better aqualix or ultrasonic cavitation ? Price is around the same
 
  • +1
Reactions: lenvoalt
8+ sessions of uc will hit deeper than aqualyx
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: Joeseminate and lenvoalt
Ultrasonic cavitation
BUT GET THE RIGHT MACHINE
There is no best machine. It’s only a good machine if it’s in your budget
But I made the mistake of getting the wrong machine:feelskek:
You also have to know what you’re doing before you purchase it
 
  • +1
Reactions: 1ncelbruh0218 and Futurehtn777
Ultrasonic cavitation
BUT GET THE RIGHT MACHINE
There is no best machine. It’s only a good machine if it’s in your budget
But I made the mistake of getting the wrong machine:feelskek:
You also have to know what you’re doing before you purchase it
I have 300 dollars badget
 
I have deep fat pads and i want to get rid of them , Whats better aqualix or ultrasonic cavitation ? Price is around the same
Aqualix permanently destroyed fat cells while UC breakdown, fat cells, but they will rebuild overtime (mark me as solution for a loil pop:Chadge:)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Diddihippi09 and Futurehtn777
Aqualix permanently destroyed fat cells while UC breakdown, fat cells, but they will rebuild overtime (mark me as solution for a loil pop:Chadge:)
So aqualix is better for deep fat pads ? Also how many sessions to see good results ?
 
  • +1
Reactions: StyIix
So aqualix is better for deep fat pads ? Also how many sessions to see good results ?
Some say 1-2 because aqualix is the stronger and permanent alternative i tried UC it will go back over time and mybe even some weeks
 
  • +1
Reactions: Futurehtn777
Solution
U think that because of the potential side effects of uc or u just think aqualix works better ?
Aqualyx is permanant

Pretty sure better on the cost side not 100% tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Futurehtn777
Yeah I know im still thinking about that tho because people like stylix prefer aqualix
fat dissolvers can permanently destroy fat cells
But ultrasonic cavitation can also
Have permanent results to
But it’s honestly practicality
Ultrasonic cavitation you can do as many times as you want
And it’s also just way more practical to do as many times as you want than a fat dissolver
It’s not about how fast fat dissolvers or ultrasonic cavitation destroys fat
It’s about long-term practicality and
Your budget
And ultrasonic cavitation would be a tiny bit better
Targeting the maler fat pad
But fat dissolvers or ultrasonic cavitation are not great for doing that
It’s an extremely fibrous area
 
  • +1
Reactions: StyIix and Futurehtn777
  • +1
Reactions: Futurehtn777

Similar threads

oneofme
Replies
2
Views
43
darklooktriad
darklooktriad
serg.psl
  • Question
Looksmax Uc question
Replies
1
Views
49
serg.psl
serg.psl
terlound
Replies
1
Views
37
latinslayer55
latinslayer55
princeof316
Replies
4
Views
66
Suikse
Suikse
J
Replies
1
Views
46
Jesus_ist_König
Jesus_ist_König

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →