Users and their favorite psyop term: “Genetics”

[tict]

Those studies, you people who throw around the term “genetics”, are referring too, haven't even "studied" genetics. Often genetics is used as a synonym of inheritance, in these epidemiological associative "studies". For example, many doctors will claim heart attacks are "genetic" just because a person, their father, and grandfather etc had them...even though this doesn't prove "genetics" are the reason at all. The cofounding variables like diet( families tend to share the exact same diet...so you would have to prove that the person, father, and grandfather, didn't eat a similar diet, otherwise that's a variable un confounded for), environment ( families share the same environment, so like before you would have to prove they DIDNT share the same environment or a similar one for that matter, or its an unconfounded variable), and the list goes on and on. You cant even show me a picture of a gene strand, just animations on a screen, let alone rDNA, and even if you could…you would have to show it’s gene expression in real time proving its causal effect, which will never happen. Yet something as unobserved as genetics is what causes your looks…not the literal food you nourish your body with?

 

[HtnceI]

Genetics have never been proven and never will

 

[HundredManSlayer]

how can you define heredity then?

why are some people black and others white then, there must be something like genetics then

 

[surgical]

 

[tict]

how can you define heredity then?

why are some people black and others white then, there must be something like genetics then

When I mean looks I mean ratios, convexities, and bone development. As for phenotypical features, we can make an educated inference that those are inherited via “genetics”. How those phenotypical features were formed in the first place leads back to environment, a non genetic relating component. People who are black developed that skin melanin for sun protection, and people who are whiter developed that sun melanin to absorb as much UV as they could, hence why people who are black are indigenous to African and whites to Europe. Again, these are all educated inferences, and associations that are likely true and “genetic”, but can never be proven, as of now, “cause and effect” wise.

 

[blamejewsjfl]

When I mean looks I mean ratios, convexities, and bone development. As for phenotypical features, we can make an educated inference that those are inherited via “genetics”. How those phenotypical features were formed in the first place leads back to environment, a non genetic relating component. People who are black developed that skin melanin for sun protection, and people who are whiter developed that sun melanin to absorb as much UV as they could, hence why people who are black are indigenous to African and whites to Europe. Again, these are all educated inferences, and associations that are likely true and “genetic”, but can never be proven, as of now, “cause and effect” wise.

Not at all bro