Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces

Randomized Shame

Randomized Shame

Head Moderator - Randomized genetic shame
Staff
Joined
Feb 18, 2023
Posts
1,367
Reputation
2,753
I found this article in a Discord server and I thought it was interesting.

"Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities" is the name of the article and it was released in 2023, so I'm getting to it kind of late but lmao.

It's a simple read. I thought I'd see what others think about it though.

Only caucasian celebrities aged 23 to 42 were included in this study.

The female celebrities and models included in their study were: Angelina Jolie, Alecia Beth Moore, Ashley Graham, Bella Hadid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Christina Applegate, Cindy Crawford, Courtney Cox, Gigi Hadid, Gisele Bundchen, Gwyneth Paltrow, Jennifer Garner, Jodie Foster, Julia Roberts, Karlie Kloss, Kate Hudson, Kendall Jenner, Michelle Pfeiffer, Nicole Kidman, Rosie Huntington, and Sandra Bullock.

The male celebrities and models included in their study were: Adam Levine, Blake Shelton, Bradley Cooper, Channing Tatum, Chris Hemsworth, David Beckham, Leonardo DiCaprio, Mel Gibson, Arthur Kulkov, David Gandy, John Kortajarena, Sean O’Pry, Tobias Sorensen, Noah Mills, Ollie Edwards, Paul Rudd, Ryan Burns, Ryan Reynolds, Simon Nessman, Tom Cruise, and Tyson Ballou.

Their method for determining the ratios was actually interesting.

First, they said they used Apple's Vision Framework for the AI that determined the basic dots (or landmarks as they called it) on the face. They still had to manually input some landmarks themselves, though, so 🤔

1751201607764


Second, they determined each subject's white-to-white corneal diameter (the width of the colored part of the eye) in pixels, then they used that to determine the rest of the face. That's obviously an over simplification but I doubt anyone here actually gives a shit what the method was in detail.

1751201619469


It's more interesting than I'm making it out to be, but it might be something we could learn from. I don't know how people currently determine their ratios. The findings in general was just also interesting.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: obscuredusk, Сигма Бой, ToryToad and 2 others
Will read in 20 mins
 
  • +1
Reactions: Сигма Бой and Randomized Shame
nigga either ur good looking or not the mirror will tell u
why bother all of this nerd shit
Did The Almighty Gods And Creators Of This Country Create It For This Shit
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: FLYlowHIGHlow, SilverStCloud, Сигма Бой and 2 others
If you need something like this to help you it is over
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: SilverStCloud and Randomized Shame
If you need something like this to help you it is over
It's just a way to determine sexual dimorphism, it's not meant to 'help' anyone.
 
  • +1
Reactions: slaters
will read after i eat my homemade banana mug cake that i made
2 nana
1 egg
lil bit salt
cinnamon
raw hunni

pls lmk i am aspiring to be future chef
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Bl0odKn1ght and Randomized Shame
Read, interesting indeed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Randomized Shame

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
51
Views
2K
fiye
fiye
Idec
Replies
9
Views
593
whotthehell
whotthehell
134applesauce456
2
Replies
91
Views
7K
UtahParentCenterPSL
UtahParentCenterPSL

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top