Deleted member 8461
Equinox
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2020
- Posts
- 2,615
- Reputation
- 5,313
The timetable for a coronavirus vaccine is 18 months. Experts say that's risky
Eighteen months might sound like a long time, but it's a blink in vaccine years. That's the Trump administration's timetable for developing a coronavirus vaccine, and some in the field say it's too fast and could come at the expense of safety.
www.cnn.com
Even CNN said it themselves that 12-18 months is the MINIMUM amount of time required for a vaccine to be developed. The vaccinations started in march, less than one year before this min requirement. And even the 12-18 months timeline is considered rushed by most experts:
"Ever since, that estimate of 12-18 months has become gospel, its appearance in media stories ubiquitous. But medical experts and scientists with firsthand experience developing vaccines are skeptical."
"could come at the expense of safety."
"Dr. Emily Erbelding, an infectious disease expert at NIAID -- which is part of the National Institutes of Health said the typical vaccine takes between 8 and 10 years to develop"
The way I see it, there are only two possibilities:
Worst case scenario, the vaccine was created by a shadow cabal for some nefarious purpose like population culling or dna altering.
Best case scenario, the vaccine was rushed thereby making it unsafe with total disregard for human life and collateral damage despite constantly being shilled by the MSM and hired glowniggers on social media. There's really no reason for anyone young and healthy to take it. We have no idea what the long-term consequences of this could be.
