Valeria mazza is not italian

W

whiteegyptian

Black Pilled
Joined
Mar 20, 2025
Posts
9,643
Reputation
16,228
Even though her last name says ''Mazza'', and she's from Argentina, a mixed Iberian and Italian country. she's not really Italian. she's Germanic through and through.

1771626908878
1771626925715
1771626963440


Looks nothing like your average Italian, she's probably 2% of total Italian population.

1771626989552
1771627003774


Sub Nordid through and through.

@Former Shortcel @ltnbrownacnecel @anthrocellogy
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: pfl, 888mastermind, Bars and 4 others
Even though her last name says ''Mazza'', and she's from Argentina, a mixed Iberian and Italian country. she's not really Italian. she's Germanic through and through.

View attachment 4679642View attachment 4679643View attachment 4679651

Looks nothing like your average Italian, she's probably 2% of total Italian population.

View attachment 4679652View attachment 4679654

Sub Nordid through and through.

@Former Shortcel @ltnbrownacnecel @anthrocellogy
Northern Italian
 
  • +1
Reactions: Andremln and Tenres
Northern Italians don't look like this either. she's the equivalent of say a blue eyed Southern Indian.
The hair is dyed, no?

Her parents seem to have Italian lineage.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres and untermensch faggot
The hair is dyed, no?

Her parents seem to have Italian lineage.
I don't think she looks white either, she looks full Italian to me too. Also yeah I think she dyed her hair.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Saint Casanova
  • JFL
Reactions: anthrocellogy
The hair is dyed, no?

Her parents seem to have Italian lineage.
She's a natural blonde. though a darker blonde rather than platinum.
I don't think she looks white either, she looks full Italian to me too. Also yeah I think she dyed her hair.
What kind of mental gymnastics have you had to go through to think she looks Italian?

This is 98% of Italians:

1771628226836
1771628236583


Brown and ugly.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Bars, Deleted member 131540 and FlotPSL
Minus the coloring, she doesn't look germanic at all.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: whiteegyptian
Minus the coloring, she doesn't look germanic at all.
You know nothing about how about Germanics look.

1771628451200
1771628465191


She's Sub Nordid. a mix of Germanic and Alpine traits. today most common in Gaul, and the Netherlands. she very much looks Germanic with minor alpine traits, that you won't even notice or be able to tell.


@FlotPSL @Former Shortcel
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL and mrdouchebag
You know nothing about how about Germanics look.

View attachment 4679731View attachment 4679732

She's Sub Nordid. a mix of Germanic and Alpine traits. today most common in Gaul, and the Netherlands. she very much looks Germanic with minor alpine traits, that you won't even notice or be able to tell.


@FlotPSL @Former Shortcel
If I saw her walking down the street, I’d say she looks Russian jfl
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Bars, mrdouchebag, whiteegyptian and 1 other person
If I saw her walking down the street, I’d say she looks Russian jfl
Jfl all the race talk here is just a bunch of people lying about their race lying about other people's race :lul:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: untermensch faggot and Saint Casanova
Jfl all the race talk here is just a bunch of people lying about their race lying about other people's race :lul:
Pipe down, son. you know nothing about genetics or phenotypes. even @anthrocellogy got a bigger claim than you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
  • JFL
Reactions: Asianthebigmannn_ and 888mastermind
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: erikt7, 888mastermind and whiteegyptian
Pipe down, son. you know nothing about genetics or phenotypes. even @anthrocellogy got a bigger claim than you.
Phenotype just refers to morphological traits of an individual, phenotypes as a reference to pseudoscience on humanphenotypes is irrelevant.

Also kek at trying to bait me into insulting him, I'm not as dumb as u boyo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthrocellogy and Badass Ravikumar
Phenotype just refers to morphological traits of an individual, phenotypes as a reference to pseudoscience on humanphenotypes is irrelevant.

Also kek at trying to bait me into insulting him, I'm not as dumb as u boyo.
Define pseudoscience.
 
  • +1
Reactions: FlotPSL
Define pseudoscience.
Pseudo meaning a fake imitation of something. So a fake imitation of science, i.e., something that presents at science at first glance but it is actually unscientific.
 
Jfl at this dumb nigga, thought pseudoscience was a big word :lul:
 
Pseudo meaning a fake imitation of something. So a fake imitation of science, i.e., something that presents at science at first glance but it is actually unscientific.
Pseudoscience = claims presented as scientific but lacking empirical support.

phenotypes are the opposite, they are literally the observable physical traits, if describing what you can see, photograph, and measure with calipers, cameras, and 3D scans is ''Pseudoscience'', then literally all of biology, anthropology forensics, and medicine are pseudoscience. good luck with that. ORG users trying to act smart always gets me.

They look better than Serbians
how the average Russian looks standing next to a Serb. not even a Serb, but any Southern Slav:

1771629275747
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 888mastermind, Bars and Saint Casanova
You know nothing about how about Germanics look.

View attachment 4679731View attachment 4679732

She's Sub Nordid. a mix of Germanic and Alpine traits. today most common in Gaul, and the Netherlands. she very much looks Germanic with minor alpine traits, that you won't even notice or be able to tell.


@FlotPSL @Former Shortcel

Nope, she looks more southern european, spanish or italian, than germanic. You are being led astray by the coloring. Give her brown hair and the truth shall be revealed to you.
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthrocellogy and untermensch faggot
Nope, she looks more southern european, spanish or italian, than germanic. You are being led astray by the coloring. Give her brown hair and the truth shall be revealed to you.
Brown haired Scandinavians still have a Nordic phenotype. just saying.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: mrdouchebag
Pseudoscience = claims presented as scientific but lacking empirical support.

phenotypes are the opposite, they are literally the observable physical traits, if describing what you can see, photograph, and measure with calipers, cameras, and 3D scans is ''Pseudoscience'', then literally all of biology, anthropology forensics, and medicine are pseudoscience. good luck with that. ORG users trying to act smart always gets me.


how the average Russian looks standing next to a Serb. not even a Serb, but any Southern Slav:

View attachment 4679778
Expects Serbs are very dark
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Badass Ravikumar, untermensch faggot and whiteegyptian
Pseudoscience = claims presented as scientific but lacking empirical support.

phenotypes are the opposite, they are literally the observable physical traits, if describing what you can see, photograph, and measure with calipers, cameras, and 3D scans is ''Pseudoscience'', then literally all of biology, anthropology forensics, and medicine are pseudoscience. good luck with that. ORG users trying to act smart always gets me.


how the average Russian looks standing next to a Serb. not even a Serb, but any Southern Slav:

View attachment 4679778
Yeah I literally said that retard, morphological means observable physical traits LOOOOOOOOOL.

Human phenotypes is a meme because it uses 19th and 20th lit. and categories that no modern anthropologist uses.

Random data point with 0 proof of extrapolation. Genius my friend
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthrocellogy and Badass Ravikumar
Yeah I literally said that retard, morphological means observable physical traits LOOOOOOOOOL.

Human phenotypes is a meme because it uses 19th and 20th lit. and categories that no modern anthropologist uses.

Random data point with 0 proof of extrapolation. Genius my friend
So you admitted phenotypes were observable, and thus can't be called pseudoscience, yet you still said they are pseudoscience? take your pills.
 
So you admitted phenotypes were observable, and thus can't be called pseudoscience, yet you still said they are pseudoscience? take your pills.
I said humanphenotypes as a site was pseudoscience.

JustRead.org
 
Phenotype just refers to morphological traits of an individual, phenotypes as a reference to pseudoscience on humanphenotypes is irrelevant.
So here I clearly did not say that phenotype as an observation of a particular individual's morphological traits is pseudoscientific. I said the specific site in reference (which you use, hence my mention) is complete pseudoscience.

Pop averages at least aren't but that's not what humanphenotypes even does.
 
I said humanphenotypes as a site was pseudoscience.

JustRead.org
Please take your pills. at first you claimed phenotypes were pseudoscience.
 
Please take your pills. at first you claimed phenotypes were pseudoscience.
Brutal, you started an argument over a clear misreading and now have to continue it despite realizing you were wrong.

When you went back and read my original post and saw my careful wording, how dumb did you feel on a scale of 1-10?
 
Brutal, you started an argument over a clear misreading and now have to continue it despite realizing you were wrong.

When you went back and read my original post and saw my careful wording, how dumb did you feel on a scale of 1-10?
dnr.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 888mastermind, untermensch faggot and Saint Casanova
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: 888mastermind and whiteegyptian
phenotypes are the opposite, they are literally the observable physical traits, if describing what you can see, photograph, and measure with calipers, cameras, and 3D scans is
your way of classifying says nothing about someone origin.
i can agree with you that her cranial structure fits the subnordid look but we can all agree that she aint from there.

Your way of classifying tells us about a persons cranial structure and not there heritage and we can all agree on that.
you can keep on classifying with your measurements but it will never conclude any strong indicator of a persons heritage.

so you can keep on analysing them craniums but please stop talking about how that information concludes to a certain heritage.

Because you posted a Stacy and then some LTB. Are you slow ?
yes OP is infact slow.
Brutal, you started an argument over a clear misreading and now have to continue it despite realizing you were wrong.

When you went back and read my original post and saw my careful wording, how dumb did you feel on a scale of 1-10?
yes OP is a moron

in this ss OP acknowledges that his way of classifying is BS
1771631157231

than he proceeds to make a claim... i proceed to justify that claim by showing an example... and OP just completely ignores me
1771631294650


This is basicly how every argument goes with this troll and many others.
1771631348931



tldr: OP you can stick to classifying phenos by cranial structure but please dont proceed to make any claims about heritage since cranial structure ≠ heritage
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres
your way of classifying says nothing about someone origin.
i can agree with you that her cranial structure fits the subnordid look but we can all agree that she aint from there.

Your way of classifying tells us about a persons cranial structure and not there heritage and we can all agree on that.
you can keep on classifying with your measurements but it will never conclude any strong indicator of a persons heritage.

so you can keep on analysing them craniums but please stop talking about how that information concludes to a certain heritage.


yes OP is infact slow.


yes OP is a moron

in this ss OP acknowledges that his way of classifying is BS
View attachment 4679891
than he proceeds to make a claim... i proceed to justify that claim by showing an example... and OP just completely ignores me
View attachment 4679906

This is basicly how every argument goes with this troll and many others.
View attachment 4679911


tldr: OP you can stick to classifying phenos by cranial structure but please dont proceed to make any claims about heritage since cranial structure ≠ heritage
Basically, he's saying, yes her phenotype is Sub Nordid, but he thinks a phenotype doesn't translate to heritage. which is frankly, retarded of him to say. and a cope for shit skins like him.
 

Similar threads

W
Replies
24
Views
324
FoidAnnihilator7113
FoidAnnihilator7113
W
Replies
37
Views
261
mr007
mr007
W
Replies
47
Views
740
pentaChad_doomer
pentaChad_doomer
unknownincel
Replies
22
Views
153
Eggshells
Eggshells
pict
Replies
52
Views
2K
fi93
fi93

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top