Valeria mazza is not italian

Basically, he's saying, yes her phenotype is Sub Nordid, but he thinks a phenotype doesn't translate to heritage. which is frankly, retarded of him to say. and a cope for shit skins like him.
take sum reading lessons bud.

yes YOU can keep on classifying by cranial structure and associate it with one of the phenotypes of .net but it wont tell your their heritage at all.

so for example YOU can classify that hernan has a dalofaelid structure whilst he clearly doesnt have any heritage from there.

so ->
1771632614007
1771632599849
"muhh matches the closest to dalofaelid"

you can keep on doing that but it will never EVER tell us anything about his heritage.

For your stupid ass its all EXAMPLES so im not saying that these could be your claims.
 
take sum reading lessons bud.

yes YOU can keep on classifying by cranial structure and associate it with one of the phenotypes of .net but it wont tell your their heritage at all.

so for example YOU can classify that hernan has a dalofaelid structure whilst he clearly doesnt have any heritage from there.

so -> View attachment 4679996View attachment 4679993 "muhh matches the closest to dalofaelid"

you can keep on doing that but it will never EVER tell us anything about his heritage.

For your stupid ass its all EXAMPLES so im not saying that these could be your claims.
never claimed hexum was dalofaelid, nice try.
 
While the study of human phenotypic variation (physical traits like skin color or hair texture) is legitimate biology, using these traits to classify humans into rigid, hierarchical, or distinct "races" is considered pseudoscience and scientific racism. Modern science shows human variation is a continuous spectrum (clinal), not split into discrete types, making traditional racial classifications scientifically invalid.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres and anthrocellogy
While the study of human phenotypic variation (physical traits like skin color or hair texture) is legitimate biology, using these traits to classify humans into rigid, hierarchical, or distinct "races" is considered pseudoscience and scientific racism. Modern science shows human variation is a continuous spectrum (clinal), not split into discrete types, making traditional racial classifications scientifically invalid.
ive told him the same so many times but he just ends up saying "dnr" or just avoids it.
OP is comical.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tenres and Shrek2OnDvD
Looks nothing like your average Italian, she's probably 2% of total Italian population.
Just in: dumbass nigga can't fathom how a supermodel doesn't look like the average person
 
  • +1
Reactions: Shrek2OnDvD, Tenres and anthrocellogy
While the study of human phenotypic variation (physical traits like skin color or hair texture) is legitimate biology, using these traits to classify humans into rigid, hierarchical, or distinct "races" is considered pseudoscience and scientific racism. Modern science shows human variation is a continuous spectrum (clinal), not split into discrete types, making traditional racial classifications scientifically invalid.
To go a step further, humans analyze dozens probably hundreds parts of a face before forming a full picture. We don't take the 5 most easily identifiable characteristics and categorize them. Ironically, he's destroying his own methodology by showing his method of measuring phenotype does not correspond with ancestry. Intra-continent variation is obviously much less measurable than inter-continental variation so it's even less predictive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: anthrocellogy and Shrek2OnDvD
Just in: dumbass nigga can't fathom how a supermodel doesn't look like the average person
Do you think if the average person had surgery and softmaxxed to death would look like her? or achieve her phenotype? nice try faggot.
 
To go a step further, humans analyze dozens probably hundreds parts of a face before forming a full picture. We don't take the 5 most easily identifiable characteristics and categorize them. Ironically, he's destroying his own methodology by showing his method of measuring phenotype does not correspond with ancestry. Intra-continent variation is obviously much less measurable than inter-continental variation so it's even less predictive.
You are probably just a mutted shitskin who doesn't look like any phenotype, so he goes on and claims it's pseudoscience, KEK.
 
You are probably just a mutted shitskin who doesn't look like any phenotype, so he goes on and claims it's pseudoscience, KEK.
You're literally brown, don't shit on your own people to win an internet argument. What a disgusting traitor. NRF
 
Do you think if the average person had surgery and softmaxxed to death would look like her? or achieve her phenotype? nice try faggot.
No because they're average you fucking retard
 
You're literally brown, don't shit on your own people to win an internet argument. What a disgusting traitor. NRF
So you conceded, that you are an ugly mutt mystery meat? thanks.
 
Yea she looks textbook nordic
 
  • +1
Reactions: whiteegyptian

Similar threads

W
Replies
24
Views
324
FoidAnnihilator7113
FoidAnnihilator7113
W
Replies
37
Views
261
mr007
mr007
W
Replies
47
Views
740
pentaChad_doomer
pentaChad_doomer
unknownincel
Replies
22
Views
153
Eggshells
Eggshells
pict
Replies
52
Views
2K
fi93
fi93

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top