irrumator praetor
Lifting so I can crack nigger and jew skulls
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2020
- Posts
- 5,442
- Reputation
- 6,710
I posted something similar about this before but the only reason they'd actually want to approach more in the gym than outside of it is because 1) its societally understood that in public is somewhere you approach people (primarily girls) in 2) since the gym is the only public mixed gender environment where approaching is less common, they feel the urge/need to make it not so. This same thing happens in other similar environments (like mens IRL or online groups)
they directly benefit from this, reason being that, if they can contribute to making a space competitive and for dating, they 1) establish SMV dynamics 2) get boosted status due to SMV dynamics 3) eventually compete for the best guys in that environment through SMV manoeuvring
TLDR it's a swift female hypergamous conquest of a male space (even though gyms aren't a male exclusive space) so its femoid cancer, feminist social-sexual market value jihad. They're like sexual value merchants fr.
Example. Look at the comment section:
This is also why they might approach (or be more interested in) their looksmatch (whatever that means in 2026) in the gym but not outside it (in public, education, work, third spaces or tinder/online). Then, she would leave that guy she started with (he is like a baby step for her in that environment) and aim for a higher SMV guy (now that SMV matters more in that space). So her starter guy is lower SMV, and eventually peak guy would be highest attainable SMV for her. Yep, you have slightly higher SMV in the gym than outside of it (even though yes more chads are concentrated in the gyms rather than not) because its unpopular to approach/date there (for obvious reasons). Can this fluctuating and inconsistent female attraction be explained? Yes, we already know foids are SMV calculators and their attraction is based on that. So if that calculation is always relative, it just means when they lust for anything above an objective (so health-marker and craniofacial and height-frame based normal development) normie (nowadays probably around MTN->HMTN) its that relativist calculator driving the attraction. Which is why the same guys might have higher SMVs in areas where dating isn't usual. Female total SMV is lower in such locations hence they actually may have a higher tendency to go for their looksmatch (maybe)
I'm not saying that's why you should date in the gym or similar environments, I'm saying you can but also if you're genuinely ugly nothing helps you, and also you gotta know 1) there's always good reasons why you simply don't usually date in some places 2) the consequences of dating in such places (for the gym -> gym becomes awkward -> motivation drops. For male friend groups -> conflict, cheating, cucking, losing friends for a temporary fleeting pussy, foid has the most leverage out of the group so the foid is basically all-powerful in that dynamic. Good or bad? You do the math, how much you care).
So women are perfect SMV merchants, whore robots. The most natural state for a woman is to be a whore. She excels and is best at being a whore, setting up a whore market if there isn't one (as we have seen here), the talent itself is to whore out. Water is wet but women are perfect whore machines. They will whore themselves out as soon as possible, in any and all scenarios, as fast as possible, as efficiently as possible. In that way, there is a value of being a natural capitalist. Out of all the things they could be doing, women are most optimized for being whores (mentally, physically, hormonally...). Like how for men their natural state is to be training, thinking etc. for women their natural state is to be ultra whores. Like, number 1 best ranked whores on the international rankings/leaderboards. While men would compete in olympic games, womens olympics would be professional whoredom (it's already here - how expensive can you sell yourself?). Lowest ranking whores are sex workers, mid-ranking whores are normie whores, highest ranking whores are wives of billionaires. For one reason or another they convinced their husband that they are more worth than the average normie whore. Life is literally that simple. This isn't even meant to be demeaning to foids or insulting/vindictive. It literally just serves to put everything (all the logic) into place. This conclusion explains everything and makes sense
they directly benefit from this, reason being that, if they can contribute to making a space competitive and for dating, they 1) establish SMV dynamics 2) get boosted status due to SMV dynamics 3) eventually compete for the best guys in that environment through SMV manoeuvring
TLDR it's a swift female hypergamous conquest of a male space (even though gyms aren't a male exclusive space) so its femoid cancer, feminist social-sexual market value jihad. They're like sexual value merchants fr.
Example. Look at the comment section:
This is also why they might approach (or be more interested in) their looksmatch (whatever that means in 2026) in the gym but not outside it (in public, education, work, third spaces or tinder/online). Then, she would leave that guy she started with (he is like a baby step for her in that environment) and aim for a higher SMV guy (now that SMV matters more in that space). So her starter guy is lower SMV, and eventually peak guy would be highest attainable SMV for her. Yep, you have slightly higher SMV in the gym than outside of it (even though yes more chads are concentrated in the gyms rather than not) because its unpopular to approach/date there (for obvious reasons). Can this fluctuating and inconsistent female attraction be explained? Yes, we already know foids are SMV calculators and their attraction is based on that. So if that calculation is always relative, it just means when they lust for anything above an objective (so health-marker and craniofacial and height-frame based normal development) normie (nowadays probably around MTN->HMTN) its that relativist calculator driving the attraction. Which is why the same guys might have higher SMVs in areas where dating isn't usual. Female total SMV is lower in such locations hence they actually may have a higher tendency to go for their looksmatch (maybe)
I'm not saying that's why you should date in the gym or similar environments, I'm saying you can but also if you're genuinely ugly nothing helps you, and also you gotta know 1) there's always good reasons why you simply don't usually date in some places 2) the consequences of dating in such places (for the gym -> gym becomes awkward -> motivation drops. For male friend groups -> conflict, cheating, cucking, losing friends for a temporary fleeting pussy, foid has the most leverage out of the group so the foid is basically all-powerful in that dynamic. Good or bad? You do the math, how much you care).
So women are perfect SMV merchants, whore robots. The most natural state for a woman is to be a whore. She excels and is best at being a whore, setting up a whore market if there isn't one (as we have seen here), the talent itself is to whore out. Water is wet but women are perfect whore machines. They will whore themselves out as soon as possible, in any and all scenarios, as fast as possible, as efficiently as possible. In that way, there is a value of being a natural capitalist. Out of all the things they could be doing, women are most optimized for being whores (mentally, physically, hormonally...). Like how for men their natural state is to be training, thinking etc. for women their natural state is to be ultra whores. Like, number 1 best ranked whores on the international rankings/leaderboards. While men would compete in olympic games, womens olympics would be professional whoredom (it's already here - how expensive can you sell yourself?). Lowest ranking whores are sex workers, mid-ranking whores are normie whores, highest ranking whores are wives of billionaires. For one reason or another they convinced their husband that they are more worth than the average normie whore. Life is literally that simple. This isn't even meant to be demeaning to foids or insulting/vindictive. It literally just serves to put everything (all the logic) into place. This conclusion explains everything and makes sense
Last edited:
