Variance of Appeal at each respective PSL

[greycel]

The best way to visualise it is that say there is a number line from 0-8PSL, the appeal would be a changing gradient

It would be hard to draw a changing gradient on the number line from 0-8, as how can you say the variance at 5PSL is generally +/- 0.5 appeal, but for 6PSL it becomes +/- 1 appeal
So you can have a different shade of a colour, and the darker the colour is at that point in the number line, it means that specific PSL has a larger variance for appeal than others

Then the higher up you go, since you can reach it whilst being aesthetic but not following modern day’s beauty standard, there’s more subjectivity, the range for appeal increases. A 7PSL like Depoot ranges from 5 to 7.5 (2.5 difference so a dark shade of a colour.. exc other 7PSL+), in say a 95% coverage interval where we don't consider extreme opinions

A 7.5 PSL Drago from 5.5 to 7.75 equivalent appeal rarity (2.25 difference so slightly less darker)
Hexum from 6.25 to 7.75 (1.5 difference)

So if we just used them 2, the averaged ~ 1.9 would correspond to a shade for appeal variance at 7.5 PSL on the number line

 

[greycel]

Thoughts
@h111 @itzyaboyJJ @Thinking_CEL @666PSL @Youㅤ

 

[greycel]

@Tai Lung @ey88 @cobicado901 @notsocommonthumb @druiglooksmaxer

 

[chrishell]

botb

 

[Deleted member 117142]

The best way to visualise it is that say there is a number line from 0-8PSL, the appeal would be a changing gradient

It would be hard to draw a changing gradient on the number line from 0-8, as how can you say the variance at 5PSL is generally +/- 0.5 appeal, but for 6PSL it becomes +/- 1 appeal
So you can have a different shade of a colour, and the darker the colour is at that point in the number line, it means that specific PSL has a larger variance for appeal than others

Then the higher up you go, since you can reach it whilst being aesthetic but not following modern day’s beauty standard, there’s more subjectivity, the range for appeal increases. A 7PSL like Depoot ranges from 5 to 7.5 (2.5 difference so a dark shade of a colour.. exc other 7PSL+), in say a 95% coverage interval where we don't consider extreme opinions

A 7.5 PSL Drago from 5.5 to 7.75 equivalent appeal rarity (2.25 difference so slightly less darker)
Hexum from 6.25 to 7.75 (1.5 difference)

So if we just used them 2, the averaged ~ 1.9 would correspond to a shade for appeal variance at 7.5 PSL on the number line

Bieber has 5.25 PSL, but 7.5 PSL appeal

 

[NoHoesinOhio]

mental fap if you have tall skull you already have the pick of your lot

 

[cytoplasm]

A 7PSL like Depoot

 

[Deleted member 67738]

The things is you can’t measure appeal, it exist and doesn’t at the same time if that makes sense, unlike PSL where there are ratios and points that you add up to get a final number.

 

[Deleted member 117142]

Depoot is a handsome Guy

But he is too skiny and also shit hair and neck, this nerfs him hard

 

[greycel]

Bieber has 5.25 PSL, but 7.5 PSL appeal

He would have a range from bottom 2.5% thinking maybe he's a 5 PSL all the way to 97.5% thinking he's 7.5.
So his appeal range is 2.5 overall

But if you averaged everybody who was 5.25 PSL, the appeal range would be "x"

And "x" corresponds to a shade of say the colour red

Now if we average the total variance of appeal for all 5.5 PSL guys, that will give the average appeal range "y"
And maybe "y" is lighter or darker than "x"

But it will be interesting to see how the magnitude of the appeal range changes as the PSL gets higher

 

[Chadeep]

Just lol at these Autistic Calculations.

 

[greycel]

The things is you can’t measure appeal, it exist and doesn’t at the same time if that makes sense, unlike PSL where there are ration and points that you add up to get a final number.

Well say if you asked a 100 women what they thought of his looks, each number having an associated rarity, and excluded the bottom and top 2.5% extremes
Then with a sufficient sample size you can find the range

Researchers do this too when they assess attractiveness of say this guy slowly increasing dimorphism:

 

[Chadeep]

Well say if you asked a 100 women what they thought of his looks, each number having an associated rarity, and excluded the bottom and top 2.5% extremes
Then with a sufficient sample size you can find the range

Researchers do this too when they assess attractiveness of say this guy slowly increasing dimorphism:
View attachment 3437795

It's Insane the DOM and STM Guys have low Appeal to Western Women These days.

 

[cobicado901]

100% true

When someone has a high PSL level, the margins of their possible appeal must necessarily be further away from each other. It was enough to see the behavior of women on rating to comprove this shit.

Or even normies say "appeal = summer, psl = winter" or high psl low appeal because of this. There are many cases where someone is at level 7 psl but can drop to 6 and vice versa. But this doesn’t happen with average men (both appeal and psl)

IMO in 99% of cases this varies depending on how visible the jaw and cheekbones are. (high bone mass or average)

thread easily proven by tiktok. sorry for the broken english or lazy arguments but I’m tired rn nigga

 

[Deleted member 62760]

This makes sense, thats why some guys like Barrett will have extremely varying opinions on how good he looks

 

[Deleted member 81875]

It's Insane the DOM and STM Guys have low Appeal to Western Women These days.

Why?

 

[greycel]

This is what I was referring to
I tagged some of you others too, might be interested

Spoiler

@shehzadgillani @zaebalsya @pfl @moggerofhumanity @PrettyLights @SilverStCloud

 

[PrettyLights]

The things is you can’t measure appeal, it exist and doesn’t at the same time if that makes sense, unlike PSL where there are ratios and points that you add up to get a final number.

Just read your lore and you fell off like crazy shit. Holy shit

 

[greycel]

Just read your lore and you fell off like crazy shit. Holy shit

He ran this forum tbh