Vegan mogger with a amazing eye area

[HighLtn]

 

[Tenres]

Vegans are the only consistent morality believers so they have my respect. All other morality believers (cucks) actively support a genocide of billions of conscious beings and they do not give a shit

 

[Deleted member 65664]

Vegans are the only consistent morality believers so they have my respect. All other morality believers (cucks) actively support a genocide of billions of conscious beings and they do not give a shit

Veganism is retarded though and morality is a man-made wall to hide your urges

 

[Deleted member 65664]

@asdvek

 

[HighLtn]

Vegans are the only consistent morality believers so they have my respect. All other morality believers (cucks) actively support a genocide of billions of conscious beings and they do not give a shit

Facts I also dont understand the hate against vegans. Vegans are morally in the right cause there is no ethical argument against veganism.

 

[Tenres]

Veganism is retarded though and morality is a man-made wall to hide your urges

Yeah but normies pretend to believe in morality but don't care about suffering if its not publicized and made an opportunity to gain social capital. Water take I know, but Vegans are the only consistent ones about it. If you care about suffering, you should care about the suffering of animals.

 

[Deleted member 65664]

Facts I also dont understand the hate against vegans. Vegans are morally in the right cause there is no ethical argument against veganism.

Animal consciousness doesn’t work the same as ours, and animals don’t have morals that fall within a human moral framework, they live according to natural instincts. An animal wouldn’t think, “He’s killing me, that feels wrong.” It would simply experience a present range of emotions without putting any meaning to them.

 

[Tenres]

Animal consciousness doesn’t work the same as ours, and animals don’t have morals that fall within a human moral framework, they live according to natural instincts. An animal wouldn’t think, “He’s killing me, that feels wrong.” It would simply experience a present range of emotions without putting any meaning to them.

So then you are fine with killing retarded people, no?

 

[Deleted member 65664]

So then you are fine with killing retarded people, no?

Strawman fallacy. But no, as I wouldn't gain anything from it.

 

[Tenres]

Strawman fallacy. But no, as I wouldn't gain anything from it.

No, I'm giving an analogous situation and asking for the symmetry breaker.

Yeah, I know. But "morality doesn't apply to animals because they do not have high-order thinking" applies to mentally retarded people and potentionally some mentally ill people who might have problems processing pain or stress.

But if we both agree morality doesn't exist then I don't get the tendency to justify it through moral terms. If morality exists, slaughtering billions for superficial reasons is not justifiable (by most standards).

 

[Deleted member 301388]

View attachment 4468936

those niggers ancestors crying right now they ate meat for that to happen btw

 

[Deleted member 65664]

No, I'm giving an analogous situation and asking for the symmetry breaker.

Yeah, I know. But "morality doesn't apply to animals because they do not have high-order thinking" applies to mentally retarded people and potentionally some mentally ill people who might have problems processing pain or stress.

But if we both agree morality doesn't exist then I don't get the tendency to justify it through moral terms. If morality exists, slaughtering billions for superficial reasons is not justifiable (by most standards).

Really good point. I believe the difference isn’t intelligence, it’s being human. Moral rights aren’t based on iq or awareness, they’re given to us humans as a group so we don’t start indiscrimanetly excluding people (even though we do ). That’s why severely disabled humans still have full moral worth, while animals aren’t part of the same moral system.

And you’re right about the contradiction. If morality doesn’t exist, nothing is really “justified”, it just happens. But if morality does exist, then killing billions of animals for trivial reasons is hard to defend by most standards.

I wanted to deny morality while still using it when it’s convenient, that’s the inconsistency.

 

[Tenres]

Really good point. I believe the difference isn’t intelligence, it’s being human. Moral rights aren’t based on iq or awareness, they’re given to us humans as a group so we don’t start indiscrimanetly excluding people (even though we do ). That’s why severely disabled humans still have full moral worth, while animals aren’t part of the same moral system.

And you’re right about the contradiction. If morality doesn’t exist, nothing is really “justified”, it just happens. But if morality does exist, then killing billions of animals for trivial reasons is hard to defend by most standards.

I wanted to deny morality while still using it when it’s convenient, that’s the inconsistency.

Well I think morality is just evolved standards that benefitted us. I think using it is reasonable because it benefitted us but its not "objective" or "fair" or "good" etc its just whatever helped us survive. Thats the reason we can easily create outgroups and lose all empathy for them, although that's not consistent with liberal morality.

 

[Deleted member 65664]

Well I think morality is just evolved standards that benefitted us. I think using it is reasonable because it benefitted us but its not "objective" or "fair" or "good" etc its just whatever helped us survive. Thats the reason we can easily create outgroups and lose all empathy for them, although that's not consistent with liberal morality.

Agree with this tbh

 

[oxyyy]

hes a kike, ngl some of them do have good eye areas