Very interesting map on European genetics

neolitic coloring - golden skin and light eyes - with hunter frame and bones >>> all.
Also just to sum it up, I think it's safe to say that Physical attraction depends on how much WHG admixture a person has. Across the board in objectivity on racial attractiveness basically prove this. Occasionally you'll see Southern Euro Moggers or some African with jbw features but 90% of the time, this is the easiest way of predicting if someone will be Chad.

Goddamn, its great being White.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, hairyballscel, Deleted member 10987 and 3 others
The turks from turkey are Oghuz Caucasoids who mixed anatolians
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
source? Don't know how Europeans with lowest Neolithic would have whitest skin but ok
The J and E halpgroups and their different clusters are the main halpgroups from the Neolithic farmers who came in 8000bc in Europe, these 2 halpgroups brought the pale white skin gene in Europe, Hunter Gatherers had very tanned skin
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
Also just to sum it up, I think it's safe to say that Physical attraction depends on how much WHG admixture a person has. Across the board in objectivity on racial attractiveness basically prove this. Occasionally you'll see Southern Euro Moggers or some African with jbw features but 90% of the time, this is the easiest way of predicting if someone will be Chad.

Goddamn, its great being White.
Obligatorygoddamnilovebeingwhitepicture a1fd157bd8c5d04e51acb70c6ed0f38e
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 3043, sensen and 1 other person
The J and E halpgroups and their different clusters are the main halpgroups from the Neolithic farmers who came in 8000bc in Europe, these 2 halpgroups brought the pale white skin gene in Europe, Hunter Gatherers had very tanned skin
Then why does the pale skin dominate in extremely low Neolithic mixed areas?
I just think this is something DNA hasn't concluded on yet
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
Also just to sum it up, I think it's safe to say that Physical attraction depends on how much WHG admixture a person has. Across the board in objectivity on racial attractiveness basically prove this. Occasionally you'll see Southern Euro Moggers or some African with jbw features but 90% of the time, this is the easiest way of predicting if someone will be Chad.

Goddamn, its great being White.
well i'm not sure about facial features beeing objective everywhere, and i do believe that culture and soft power play an even bigger role in beauty standards, but i also believe that for frame and height, there is a genuine consensus : the taller and the wider, the better, until a limit tho.
There is no doubt about that.

The thing is, what you'll consider "white" back in time was commongly shared from people of central asia to the whole europe. Now it's mostly a european thing, because of yamnaya mixing and killing every others.

The more genetic and visual diversity in the world, the better, they did wrong ngl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
Then why does the pale skin dominate in extremely low Neolithic mixed areas?
I just think this is something DNA hasn't concluded on yet
Cause of the Yamnaya who were also pale and white, high Neolithic people like the Assyrians look very pale, i had a Assyrian family near me, they looked very white
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Blue
The J and E halpgroups and their different clusters are the main halpgroups from the Neolithic farmers who came in 8000bc in Europe, these 2 halpgroups brought the pale white skin gene in Europe, Hunter Gatherers had very tanned skin
J is mostly the semitic right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
well i'm not sure about facial features beeing objective everywhere, and i do believe that culture and soft power play an even bigger role in beauty standards, but i also believe that for frame and height, there is a genuine consensus : the taller and the wider, the better, until a limit tho.
There is no doubt about that.

The thing is, what you'll consider "white" back in time was commongly shared from people of central asia to the whole europe. Now it's mostly a european thing, because of yamnaya mixing and killing every others.

The more genetic and visual diversity in the world, the better, they did wrong ngl.
Yeah, ancient Eurasian supremacy.

I would diasgree, I think beauty is pretty objective, although a bit tougher to predict when intersecting racial lines.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Blue and Deleted member 3043
Cause of the Yamnaya who were also pale and white, high Neolithic people like the Assyrians look very pale, i had a Assyrian family near me, they looked very white
yes that's true. look at people from lebanon, or levant, or "white" arab - in coloring -, they tend to be "whiter" than most whites. Only people like robert pattison seem to have the same coloring. i wonder if he is from the same cluster partly.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and Blue
Cause of the Yamnaya who were also pale and white, high Neolithic people like the Assyrians look very pale, i had a Assyrian family near me, they looked very white
Oh, I see what you're saying. Still, Id like a source. Interesting to read.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and Blue
yes that's true. look at people from lebanon, or levant, or "white" arab - in coloring -, they tend to be "whiter" than most whites. Only people like robert pattison seem to have the same coloring. i wonder if he is from the same cluster partly.
Some of them are CRAZY white ngl
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444, Deleted member 3043 and Deleted member 10987
exactly.
but i thought actually yamnaya came from both central asia and caucasus. not only central asia.
That's why so many afghanistan, tajik people etc, have white soft features, and decently good coloring.
@sytyl
Well the yamnaya stretched from Eastern Ukraine to Afghanistan thats whh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 3043, Deleted member 10987 and 1 other person
I think my french part is Celtic-Germanic
Are Celtic-Germanics steppe nomads or Hunter Gatherers ??
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Blue
Arabs were desert nomads so pastoralist nomads ????
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Blue
Yeah, ancient Eurasian supremacy.

I would diasgree, I think beauty is pretty objective, although a bit tougher to predict when intersecting racial lines.
Agree, eurasian was mogger and it was better.

Well, i've read a bit into looks, its evolution and geography. And believe me, what is considered attractive even in the west nowadays wasn't the same 20 years ago. Let alone outside of the west.
The sole genuine reason is that culture and perspection especially when very young - until 5 yo study show that what you'll find attractive is very linked to what you say very young on a regular basis - play the major role.

That's why also, i only recommend soft surgeries if anything, never hard surgeries unless severly recessed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090 and Blue
I think my french part is Celtic-Germanic
Are Celtic-Germanics steppe nomads or Hunter Gatherers ??
i would say celtic have decent amount of hg in them tbh. But they tend to be shorter than current nordics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 10987 and Blue
The sole genuine reason is that culture and perspection especially when very young - until 5 yo study show that what you'll find attractive is very linked to what you say very young on a regular basis - play the major role.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090 and Deleted member 3043
i would say celtic have decent amount of hg in them tbh. But they tend to be shorter than current nordics.
Germanics ???
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Blue
what are diff curries consisted of tbh?
unironically curries have a decent amoung of R haplogroup : They are more mixed with yamnaya than west asian. So the indo-aryan isn't a meme.
But, what makes curry, curry is that their abo dna is stronger and takes lots of generation of "bleaching" to get lost.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, sytyl, curryslayerordeath and 2 others
Agree, eurasian was mogger and it was better.

Well, i've read a bit into looks, its evolution and geography. And believe me, what is considered attractive even in the west nowadays wasn't the same 20 years ago. Let alone outside of the west.
The sole genuine reason is that culture and perspection especially when very young - until 5 yo study show that what you'll find attractive is very linked to what you say very young on a regular basis - play the major role.

That's why also, i only recommend soft surgeries if anything, never hard surgeries unless severly recessed.
I can agree here and there, but there are some traits that seem hardwired. I think blue eyes is an obvious one. I think blonde hair, regardless of of what Shlomo says in his studies is another obvious. Had it not been attractive, like blue eyes, it just wouldn't have been spread.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Blue and Deleted member 3043
I think my french part is Celtic-Germanic
Are Celtic-Germanics steppe nomads or Hunter Gatherers ??
Mix of both, and if you have lots of MEd ancestors from South of France, probably high in NEolithic as well.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, TsarTsar444, Deleted member 3043 and 2 others
I can agree here and there, but there are some traits that seem hardwired. I think blue eyes is an obvious one. I think blonde hair, regardless of of what Shlomo says in his studies is another obvious. Had it not been attractive, like blue eyes, it just wouldn't have been spread.
may be some trait but i couldn't be able to pin point which from now yet.
As for blond hair, dark blond is usually nowadays seen as good as brown tbh.
But back in time, people didn't cared much about what was attractive or not, i mean, from a selection perspective, because yamnaya basically spread from central asia to euro, by raping, and they were basically the sole iirc with very light blond hair.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090 and Blue
Germanics ???
French are typically high in indo euro mostly with the later two bein a mix of Neolithic and whg, but if your french part is from south France then most likely your french part is very Neolithic
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043, Deleted member 10987 and Blue
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
I can agree here and there, but there are some traits that seem hardwired. I think blue eyes is an obvious one. I think blonde hair, regardless of of what Shlomo says in his studies is another obvious. Had it not been attractive, like blue eyes, it just wouldn't have been spread.
Blonde hair being ugly is such a massive cope tbh
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 3043, Deleted member 10987 and 3 others
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 3043 and Blue
French are typically high in indo euro mostly with the later two bein a mix of Neolithic and whg, but if your french part is from south France then most likely your french part is very Neolithic
Mix of both, and if you have lots of MEd ancestors from South of France, probably high in NEolithic as well.
From paris i think
My french grandmother had light brown hair, hazel eyes but very big jawline/cheekbones
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Blue and Deleted member 3043
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 3043 and Deleted member 10987
From paris i think
My french grandmother had light brown hair, hazel eyes but very big jawline/cheekbones
Hard to know cause paris is a capital where lots of people all over France settled in
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 10987, Blue and 1 other person
Blonde hair being ugly is such a massive cope tbh
nobody say it's ugly. But from an attraction standpoint, the darker you look - with contrast - the better.
very light blond hair is more prettyboyish.
That's why it's not ideal for full appeal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 10987, Blue and 1 other person
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
nobody say it's ugly. But from an attraction standpoint, the darker you look - with contrast - the better.
very light blond hair is more prettyboyish.
That's why it's not ideal for full appeal.
Dark brown and dirty blonde are the best haircolors, light blonde is not sexy at all, but it definitely looks the most beautiful and unique
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue and Deleted member 3043
nobody say it's ugly. But from an attraction standpoint, the darker you look - with contrast - the better.
very light blond hair is more prettyboyish.
That's why it's not ideal for full appeal.
Didn't say it's ideal - I have dark brown hair for that matter too - but it isn't a failo as PSL people like to make it out to be lol.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043
exactly.
angelic = more reserved to female, on average.
Im not sure, there were studies done in some euro countries and men also picked females with brown hair as most attractive. Blonde looks kinda beautiful but it just isn't as hot
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Blue
Dark brown and dirty blonde are the best haircolors, light blonde is not sexy at all, but it definitely looks the most beautiful and unique
agree ngl.
but as a male, you don't want to look "beautiful", you want to look masculine and "classy".
that's why blond hair mogs when young and prettyboy and less older.

it's easy tbh, it's a question of opposition : women are more gl with angelic and cute tiny skull and lighter coloring, and men bigger, taller, wider, darker colored but still with good contrast.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
Didn't say it's ideal - I have dark brown hair for that matter too - but it isn't a failo as PSL people like to make it out to be lol.
oh yeah it's not a failo at all.
it's just a question of whom you want to appeal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Blue and TsarTsar444
agree ngl.
but as a male, you don't want to look "beautiful", you want to look masculine and "classy".
that's why blond hair mogs when young and prettyboy and less older.

it's easy tbh, it's a question of opposition : women are more gl with angelic and cute tiny skull and lighter coloring, and men bigger, taller, wider, darker colored but still with good contrast.
You can be beautiful and masculine (Maesthetic)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue
Blonde look childish/sexless
Not angelic or feminine as the copers here would say
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3043 and Blue
Females look far better with light brown or raven tbh
When i was a kid blonde girls appealed so much to me with blue eyes, but as i got close to 20 my fav women is having brown hair now, even ethnic looking like this
1612835384530
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Zygos4Life, Deleted member 3043 and 2 others
unironically curries have a decent amoung of R haplogroup : They are more mixed with yamnaya than west asian. So the indo-aryan isn't a meme.
But, what makes curry, curry is that their abo dna is stronger and takes lots of generation of "bleaching" to get lost.
i looked it up rn, seems like the subcontinent has various mixes between some farmers from the central asian steppes (i guess these are the indo aryans?), farmers from the iranic region (these are the neolithic farmers that mixed w kurds? - that u despise jfl), and southern hunter gatherers (not related to abos, more like rly rly dark cacausoids - like the robust sri lankan villagers). some traces of mongol composition comes from various mixing w ppl from the east too, but thats only for a small portion of the subcontinent.

interesting how ppl there pretty much stayed completely within their religious group/caste so various genetic proportions have been almost constant for a rly LONG time.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090 and Deleted member 3043
Im not sure, there were studies done in some euro countries and men also picked females with brown hair as most attractive. Blonde looks kinda beautiful but it just isn't as hot
yes if we talk about appeal. doesn't change the fact that, for pure aesthetic, and "beautifulness", blond "angelic" hair mogs.

exactly why griffith is ideal for very high aesthetic, because imo what is even more angelic than light blond is light white or what it's called here :
literally light coloring
1612896623368
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: TsarTsar444, Deleted member 10987 and Blue
nobody say it's ugly. But from an attraction standpoint, the darker you look - with contrast - the better.
very light blond hair is more prettyboyish.
That's why it's not ideal for full appeal.
Blondism is a neotenous trait. I think this is why it gives the "prettyboy" vibe. I also think neotenous traits signal something in humans that reminds them to breed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Blue, Deleted member 3043 and 1 other person
When i was a kid blonde girls appealed so much to me with blue eyes, but as i got close to 20 my fav women is having brown hair now, even ethnic looking like this
View attachment 976128
Always raven/light brown for me
The eye color, it really depends as long its not pitch black
An eye area like fox is perfect for me
Crop
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Deleted member 9090, Deleted member 6873, Deleted member 3043 and 2 others
Blonde look childish/sexless
Not angelic or feminine as the copers here would say
this looks angelic asf, impossible to beat bro, can't deny :
1612896800261
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Zygos4Life, Blue and TsarTsar444
yes if we talk about appeal. doesn't change the fact that, for pure aesthetic, and "beautifulness", blond "angelic" hair mogs.

exactly why griffith is ideal for very high aesthetic, because imo what is even more angelic than light blond is light white or what it's called here :
literally light coloring
View attachment 976130
Really ????
Always tought even brown hair would look more angelic/cute
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blue, TsarTsar444 and Deleted member 3043

Similar threads

D
Replies
14
Views
1K
KeepCopingLads
KeepCopingLads
Сигма Бой
Replies
37
Views
1K
Сигма Бой
Сигма Бой
Nodesbitch
Replies
70
Views
5K
Deleted member 208062
D
D
Replies
20
Views
2K
OGJBSLAYER
OGJBSLAYER

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top